Helen- Behavioural Activation Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

when was Jacobson et als study?

A

1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was the jacobsons study about

A

RCT based on component analysis of CBT for depression
dismantling study
BA VS BA+ modifying automatic thoughts VS BA + AT+ addressingcore schema (full cbt)

want to know whether onto BA BA improve therapies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the results of Jacobson et al

A

all 3= equally effective at reducing depressive symptom (post/ 6 months/ 24 month follow up)

all 3= enjoyment / engagement incrwased and negatie thinking decreasing decreased- even thouh BA doesn’t address thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the strengths of Jacobson

A

BA as effective as CBT for depression

BA cheaper and easier than CBT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the cons of jacobson

A

needs to replicate and contextual BA
conducted at uni of Washington–> all favour BA
152 pps- small sample sixe(10 men 42 women)- women more social?
8% attrition rates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

wht type of study was jacobson

A

dismantling study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were the conditions in Jacobson

A

BA VS BA+ modifying automatic thoughts VS BA + AT+ addressingcore schema (full cbt)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the MH disorder in Jacobson

A

depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when was craske

A

2010

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was craske say about the need for BA

A

post ww2= need fr interventions - met by wolpe who created systematic desensitisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

who created systematic desensitisation

A

wolpe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is behavioural therapy according to craske

A

experimental field of learning - strong commitment to assessment and research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does craske say is the applied experimental approach

A

relys on testable conceptual framework and emhasies rigourous evaluation method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is operant conditioning according to craske

A

operates on envior nd maintained by consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

wat is extinction according to craske

A

first developed by skinner as behaviour modification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what type of study is mazzucheli , kane and rees 2009

A

meta-analysis of outcome studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

when was mazzucheli , kane and rees

18
Q

how many studies and pps in mazzucheli , kane and rees 2009

A

34 studies, 2,055 pps

19
Q

what does mazzucheli , kane and rees 2009compare

A

BA with controls

X4 types of BA

20
Q

what did mazzucheli , kane and rees 2009 find

A

no difference between BA and CT (as effective)

evidence that BA has an equivalent holding power to CBT/CT by 24 months

21
Q

what did mazzucheli , kane and rees 2009 state about MHD

A

if will be the 2nd largest health burden by 2020

22
Q

what are the strengths of mazzucheli , kane and rees 2009

A

used large range of population (elderly/kids)–> showed significant to all (BA) and easily applied

can be applied to other disabilities also

23
Q

what are the weaknesses of mazzucheli , kane and rees 2009

A

only x2 high quality ecidence used - therefore study is possibly efficacious

didn’t find that diff vaieants f BA-> diff outcomes (too widely spread for statistical difference)-> need for contextual BA

few= waiting list control/ follow up of 3 months/ less –> therefore hard to see improvement

unclear active ingredients of BA

24
Q

what did Farmer and chapman 2016 conclude about BA

A

BA= effective and economical method for reducing anxiety and depression

25
what happened in Farmer and chapman 2016 study clupers 2007?
meta-analysis of treatments for depression VS controls found average was 0.74 found that BA and CT only gad a difference of 0.02 (just as effective)
26
what did Farmer and chapman 2016 find in Dobson 2008
+ 2 years after BA discontinued - was as effective for relapse as ADM
27
What did Farmer and chapman 2016 find as pros for BA
BA suits lots of clinical populations - eg obesity, PTSD, Medical adherence for people with lack of developed verbal skills/ mindfulness/ ability to describe internal processes - good tailored ubrervention - engagement mood changes, achieve goals --> lasts 16-24 weeks
28
what type of study was Ourgin 2011
systematic review of 20 RCTs
29
how many pps and RCTs in Ourgin 2011
20 RCTs N=1,308
30
what did Ourgin 2011 study
CT vs exposure
31
what did Ourgin 2011 find out
BA as effective for panic disorder (with or without OCD and PTSD)
32
what are the cons of Ourgin 2011
no review for GAD - but high levels of worry in this so maynot be good to use thoughts cant explain/ predict MH problems not all benefit drop out rates high
33
what are the pros seen in Ourgin 2011
based on testable evidence - evidence based theory interventions supported by evidence (being that it is effective for many ) shows quick improvements easy to train - even if unsure of theory
34
what MH disorder does Ourgin 2011 investigate
anxiety
35
what MH disorder does mazuchelli investigate
depression
36
what year was ourigin
2011
37
what studies can be used as an argument for BA for depression
dimijian et ak farmer and chapman 2016 Mazzucheli kane and rees 2009 Jacobson 1996
38
what studies can be used as an argument for BA for anxiety
ourigin
39
name a dismantling study in favour of BA
Dimijian jacobson
40
name an outcome study in favour of BA
farmer and chapman ourigin
41
what is Bouton 2012 argument against BA
extinction which is supposedly seen in systematic desensitising isn't unlearning but is learning a new association the response in which we use each association depends upon the context o we must learn it in many settings