Hepatocellular Carcinoma ( HCC) Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

Classification of liver tumours

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Incidence of HCC

A
  • The commonest primary liver cancer worldwide
  • 6th most common cancer worldwide with age-adjusted incidence rate (ASR) 10 per 100,000 population
  • In Malaysia, it is the 8th most common cancer with ASR 3.5 per 100,000. Chinese has higher incidence.
  • Male to female ratio 2:1 with majority (85%) presented at late stage (stage III/IV)- Malaysia NCR 2012-2016
  • WHO predict 1 million death from HCC in 2030 making it second most lethal cancer after pancreatic cancer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Etiology of HCC

A
  • The strongest risk factor for developing HCC is cirrhosis from any liver disease etiology (80%)
  • Patients with cirrhosis from any etiology typically have a ∼2% annual risk of developing HCC.
  • Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections remain the predominant etiologic risk factors in many parts of the world, although the proportion of patients with HCC with HBV or HCV infection is declining in areas with dedicated viral hepatitis elimination programs .
  • Alcohol-associated cirrhosis is a known risk factor for HCC development, and alcohol use as a cofactor with other etiologies increases HCC risk as much as 5-fold.
  • NAFLD has become a significant public health concern, related to significant increases in the prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome.
  • Aflatoxin B1 (aspergillus flavus, A. Parasiticus)
  • Hereditary metabolic liver disease:
    • Hereditary hemochromatosis.
    • Hereditary tyrosinemia.
    • Deficiency of α1 anti-trypsin deficiency.
    • Wilsons disease (only in presence of cirrhosis)
  • OCP: 7 – 20 times increased with > 8 yrs use.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pathogenesis of HCC

A
  • Pathogenesis of HCC is related to CLD due to sustained hepatic inflammation, fibrosis and aberrant regeneration
  • This condition together with genetic and epigenetic events leads to dysplastic liver nodule (pre-malignant)
  • Further molecular alterations cause transition of dysplastic nodule to full blown carcinoma

Hepatitis B is the one that can “skip” cirrhosis and directly lead to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
🧠 Why does Hepatitis B skip cirrhosis?
The key lies in how Hepatitis B virus (HBV) behaves:
🔬 HBV is a DNA virus that integrates into the host’s genome:
This integration into hepatocyte DNA can trigger oncogenic changes directly.
Therefore, HBV can cause HCC even without cirrhosis.
Chronic inflammation and immune-mediated damage add to the risk, but genomic integration is the unique driver.

⚠️ On the other hand, Hepatitis C (HCV) is an RNA virus:
Does not integrate into the host genome.
Causes chronic inflammation, leading to fibrosis → cirrhosis → HCC.
So, HCV-induced HCC almost always occurs after cirrhosis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Genetic alteration in HCC.

A
  • Genetic alteration in HCC mainly Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter (60%), Tp53 (30%), VEGF (5%)
  • HCC is a solid cancer with few somatic mutations making targeted molecular therapy less useful
  • 2 molecular subtypes can be identified in HCC: proliferative and non-proliferative class
  • Non-proliferative class is thought to be less aggressive and associated with better prognosis
  • However, this molecular subtyping rarely uses in practice and has lack clinical usefulness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Screening in higk risk group

A
  1. Patients with chronic HBV infection with or without cirrhosis
  2. Patient with chronic HCV infection
  3. Patient with cirrhosis from any etiology -alcoholic cirrhosis, genetic causes (hemochromatosis)

? Screening for NAFLD

? Self awareness of routine medical check up with blood profile

  • Reported sensitivity of USG 50-80% with specificity of 90%
  • Limited role of CT and MRI in context of surveillance due to limited data in literature
  • Serum alpha fetoprotein alone as surveillance has low sensitivity and specificity (60%/80%)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Management of Surveillance result

A
  • US visualization should be assessed and reported for surveillance exams given its impact on recommended recall procedures (Level 5, Strong Recommendation).
  • Patients with limited ultrasound visualization may undergo surveillance contrast enhanced MRI or multiphase CT (Level 5, Weak Recommendation).
  • Patients with any suspicious lesion ≥ 1cm on ultrasound should undergo diagnostic evaluation with multiphasic contrast enhanced CT or MRI (Level 1, Strong Recommendation).
  • American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) advises diagnostic evaluation with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI in patients with AFP ≥20 ng/mlor rising AFP (Level 3, Strong Recommendation).

🧬 What is Primovist?
🔹 Primovist = Trade name for Gadoxetate Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)
🔹 It’s a hepatocyte-specific MRI contrast agent
🔹 Used in liver MRI to enhance both vascular and hepatobiliary phases

🧪 Pharmacokinetics:
~50% is taken up by functioning hepatocytes
Excreted:
50% via bile
50% via kidneys

🔍 How It Works:
Normal liver cells (hepatocytes) → take up Primovist → appear bright in hepatobiliary phase
Lesions without hepatocytes (e.g. HCC, metastases) → do not take it up → appear dark (hypointense)

🕐 Phases in MRI with Primovist:
🩸 Arterial phase ~20 seconds Hypervascular lesions (e.g. HCC)
💧 Portal venous phase ~60–70 seconds Venous drainage, background enhancement
⚪ Delayed phase ~3–5 minutes Washout in malignant lesions
🌟 Hepatobiliary phase (HBP) ~20 minutes post-injection Highlights functioning liver tissue

🧠 Why Primovist is Useful:
Helps differentiate between:
- Benign vs malignant liver lesions
- HCC vs regenerative nodules in cirrhosis
- Improves sensitivity and specificity for small HCC detection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Multiphase CT or MRI report ( LI-RADS)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Role of biopsy in HCC

A

Biopsy is indicated in patient with inconclusive pattern on imaging and patient without cirrhosis

Biopsy – pathological hallmark – stromal invasion

  • Stain for tumor markers including CD34, CK7, glypican 3, Hsp70, and glutamine synthetase can help characterize lesions that are not clearly HCC on microscopy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Presentation of HCC

A
  • Asymptomatic, incidental finding during screening (raised AFP or imaging) or during investigation for other complaint with normal LFT.
  • RHC pain, chronic dyspepsia, RHC or epigastric mass.
  • Jaundice, deranged LFT.
  • LOA & LOW.
  • Sudden hepatic decompensation in cirrhotic patients.
  • Acute abdomen: Rupture with bleeding intraperitoneally or acute pain from bleeding into the tumor.
  • Anaemia from intratumoral bleeding.
  • Paraneoplastic syndrome: anomalous erythropoietin release lead to polycythaemia.
  • Hypercalcemia (due to secretion of parathyroid hormone-related protein), hyperthyroidism, hypoglycemia & hyperlipidemia, Hypoglycemia (tumor’s high metabolic needs) .
  • Ascites and sometimes blood stained.
  • Watery diarrhoea
  • Signs & symptoms of chronic liver disease.
  • 10% of pts have bruit.

Metastasis

  • Lung > intra-abdominal lymph nodes > bone > adrenal gland.
  • Brain metastases are rare overall (0.2 to 2 percent).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Investigation by CT & USG

A

Determine degree of liver cirrhosis by:

  • Sonoelastography : chronic tissue damage as it leads to subsequent scar tissue formation and accumulation (e.g. irregular or nodular liver), liver loses some of its elasticity and becomes stiffer. Determine severity of cirrhosis.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the stages of Fibrosis

A
  • Stages F0 and F1 - Patients with a low risk for fibrosis who are unlikely to need further follow-up.
  • Stages F2 and F3 - Patients who have moderate to severe fibrosis and are at risk for progression of fibrosis, depending on the origin of the fibrosis.
  • Stage F4 and some stage F3 - Patients with a high risk for advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis who require prioritization for therapy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is caudate:right lobe ratio?

A
  • Caudate : Right lobe ratio - in the setting of cirrhosis, in which there is atrophy of the right lobe (caudate hypertrophy).
    • C/RL <0.6 = normal (does not exclude cirrhosis)
    • C/RL 0.6-0.65 = borderline
    • C/RL >0.65 = 96% likely to be cirrhotic
    • C/RL >0.73 = 99% likely to be cirrhotic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How to calculate Functional reserve of Liver?

A
  • 3D CT volumetry:20% for normal non cirrhotic pt, 30% in patient undergoes chemotherapy, 40% in cirrhotic
  • Indocyanine Green Clearance (ICG) - Overnight fasting. ICG 0.5g/kg IV & blood taken at 5, 10, 15 mins after injections.
    • ICGR15 - ≥ 15% retention at 15 mins contraindicated for major resection.
    • ICGR15 - ≤ 10% at 15 min is upper limit for resection of ≥ 4 segment.

Evaluate Liver Function with ICG Retention at 15 Minutes (ICG-R15)
ICG-R15 (%) measures how much Indocyanine Green remains in the blood 15 minutes after injection.
A higher ICG-R15 indicates worse liver function.
Normal values: ICG-R15 < 10% (healthy liver).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What blood test to obtain?
based on Child-Pugh Classification

A

Class A = 5-6 (least severe liver disease)
Class B = 7-9 (moderately severe liver disease), Class C = 10-15 (most severe liver disease).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is MELD score ?

A

MELD Score (Model for End Stage Liver Disease) - validated as predictor of survival in patients with cirrhosis, alcoholic hepatitis, acute liver failure, and in patients with acute hepatitis. [DOI:10.1002/hep.21563]

  • 3.78×ln[serum bilirubin (mg/dL)] + 11.2×ln[INR] + 9.57×ln[serum creatinine (mg/dL)] + 6.43. (ln = Log e)

The MELD score is a widely used system to assess the severity of liver disease and predict mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis. It is primarily used to prioritize liver transplant candidates and guide clinical decision-making.

✅ MELD ≥15 → Liver transplant referral recommended
✅ MELD ≥30 → Urgent transplant needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Operability of patient : Performance status

A

Physiological Reserve

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) - a non-invasive method used to assess the performance of the heart and lungs at rest and during exercise.

  • Exercise modalities - selection of modality and protocol are dependent upon the requesting physician, level of fitness and health, weight, age, and patient preference
    • Bicycle ergometer
    • Treadmill
  • Information analyzed
    • Lung Function: Flow volume loops
    • Oxygen Consumption during exercise (VO2 max)
    • Anaerobic Threshold
    • Heart performance during exercise
    • Blood gas measurement from blood sample taken from the earlobe
    • Exercise 12 lead ECG
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the latest update on BCLC ?

A
  • The BCLC was updated in 2022 to refine prognostication by highlighting the benefit of using objective scores, such as Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score to assess liver dysfunction as well as biomarkers, including AFP levels.
  • It also recognizes the heterogeneity among patients with BCLC Stage B and incorporates concepts of downstaging and stage migration over time.
19
Q

Barcelona Clinic Liver cancer (BCLC)

20
Q

What are the grading for tumour related portal vein thrombosis (PVTT)?

A

Tumor-related Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVTT) can be graded as:
- PV1 (segmentary)
- PV2 (secondary order branch)
- PV3 (first order branch)
- PV4 (main trunk/contralateral branch).

Extension of PVTT is known to directly affect patients prognosis whatever treatment is attempted, including LR, especially in the presence of elevated alpha-fetoprotein and large tumors.

21
Q

what are the limitation of BCLC?

A

Child Pugh Criteria (5-7 vs 8-15)
Functional Reserve Volume (ICG)
Future Liver Remnant (CT Volumetry)
Microvascular Invasion (Alpha Fetoprotein level)

22
Q

Management of BCLC 0 (very early stage)

A
  • Thermal ablation (radiofrequency or micro wave ablation) should be considered the treatment of choice for patients with early stage HCC ≤3 cm (Level 1, Strong Recommendation).
  • Patients with solitary tumors ≤5 cm should be treated with curative intent using local ablative therapies if they are ineligible for or decline surgical therapy (Level 1, Strong Recommendation).
  • Targeted radiation segmentectomy or EBRT may be used as alternative therapies to thermal ablation for patients with BCLC stage A HCC who are not candidates for surgical resection, including those with tumors >3 cm in size (Level 3, Strong Recommendation).
23
Q

Overview of Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)

A

Electric current (375 to 500 kHz) passes through a monopolar electrode tip inserted into HCC that induces a Joule effect by ionic agitation, and thus local heat, reaching a temperature from 60 to 100 C, for coagulation necrosis.

  • Treat tumor no larger than 3 cm in largest dimension due to ‘‘centrifugal” ablation effect (heat propagates in a centrifugal direction from energy source (electrode tip) in center of tumor to periphery).
  • Not effective in tumor near larger vessels as thermal effect is less (removed by flowing blood – Heat Sink Effect).
  • To overcome new ablation devices have been developed: expandable multi-tined devices, internally cooled electrodes, multipolar ablation using bipolar electrodes.
  • Size of the tumors (>2–3 cm) and presence of a major vessel in the vicinity are the two main risk factors for local tumor relapse identified in literature.
    • Margin ablation of at least 0.5 cm to 1 cm, 360 degrees around the tumor, advocated
      to treat microvascular invasion and satellite nodules and to decrease risk of local tumor progression.
  • Contraindications:
    • Limited life expectancy (< 6 months)
    • Severe cirrhosis
    • Portal vein thrombosis
    • Central HCC abutting the primary bile duct - risk of biliary tract injury
    • Pacemaker is a contraindication for monopolar RFA, but not for bipolar RFA or MWA
  • Complication:
    • Post-ablation syndrome causes pain and fever, and is not considered a complication
      per se if duration of syndrome remains short and easily manageable with symptomatic treatment
    • Hepatic abscess (predisposing factors - history of sphincterotomy or bilio-enteric anastomosis), bile leak, intrahepatic Hematoma
    • Hemoperitoneum, pneumothorax & pleural effusion
    • Intestinal perforation, hepatic failure and death.
24
Q

Overview of Microwave Thermal Ablation

A

Creates an electromagnetic field around a monopolar electrode (centrifugal ablation), inducing homogeneous heating and coagulation necrosis.

  • Advantages over RFA - Heats up more rapidly and at a higher temperature, has the advantage of simultaneously treating more lesions in a shorter time, achieving larger ablation areas, can treat lesions larger than 5 cm, could treat HCC adjacent to large vessels without heat sink effect.
25
Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI)
Under ultrasound, 95% ethanol is injected into the tumor. - Indicated for HCC < 2 cm, located near major vessels (where RFA not feasible) - Associated with incomplete necrosis in most HCCs >2 cm and a high local recurrence rate (49%). - Percutaneous acetic acid injection, shows no advantages to PEI. - Largely replaced by RFA. [DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.003, DOI:10.1136/gut.2004.045203, DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.009, DOI:10.1148/radiol.2281020718]
26
Overview of Cryoablation
Uses a device with argon or helium gas to decrease temperature by Thomson effect around the needle and induce tissue freezing and vascular injury. An ice ball can be visualized with US, CT or MRI during ablation and helps to monitor treatment. - ‘‘**cryo-shock**”, a life-threatening condition resulting in multi-organ failure, severe coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation following cryoablation
27
Management of BCLC A ( Early Stage) - Surgical Resection
Mainly Surgical Resection or Transplant **Surgical Resection** - Surgical resection should be the **treatment of choice** for localized HCC in the **absence of underlying cirrhosis** (Level 2, Strong Recommendation). - In patients with **cirrhosis**, surgical resection should be considered the treatment of choice for patients with **limited tumor burden, well-compensated cirrhosis without clinically significant portal hypertension, and an adequate FLR**(Level 2, Strong Recommendation). - Routine postoperative **surveillance** should be performed to detect recurrence using **contrast-enhanced multiphasic CT or MRI every 3–6months for all patients with HCC following liver resection** (Level 3, Strong Recommendation).
28
Principle of Surgical Resection ( Liver Resection)
- Single stage vs Multi stage. - **Margin: 1 cm** - Liver resection can be offered to single HCC regardless of its size with a definitive survival advantage over other treatments – especially for tumor >5 cm – surgical feasibility may vary according to the liver volume and function-preservation principles.
29
Single stage Liver Resection
1) Anatomic resections - (A-A’) removes entirely the tumor-bearing portal branches bordered by the landmark veins. Caudate lobe can be removed as an isolated resection or as a component of more extensive resections 2) None Anatomic resections - Limited resections of a small portion of liver without respect to the vascular supply, tumor-bearing 3rd-order portal region is not fully removed (B-B’). After non-anatomic resection of HCC some part of tumor-bearing portal region is left, which is at high risk of tumor recurrence
30
Multistage of Liver Resection
**Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)** - **1st step** - liver parenchyma is transected along the intended line of resection and the future liver remnant cleaned by partial resections from all tumor tissue in the case of bilobar tumors. - Portal ligation of the larger liver lobe that will be removed. - The patient is then allowed to recover for a period of 1-2 weeks. - **2nd step** - the deportalized liver is removed to render the patient completely tumor-free.
31
Perioperative complications of Liver Resection
**Intra-operative** - Bleeding - Intermittent Pringle maneuver (15 min clamp then release for 5 min) - Maintaining low CVP (< 5 mmHg) with minimal acceptable U/O (0.5 ml/kg/hr) and advance in instrument (ABC). - CUSA – Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator **Post-operative** - Hypophosphatemia - Common & occur on D2 to D5 post-op, Underlying pathophysiology not fully defined, generally attributed to increased consumption of ATP by regenerating liver and transient renal loss. - Liver failure Predictor of Liver Failure and Death After Hepatectomy **50-50 criteria** [DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000189131.90876.9e] - PT <50% and - Serum Bilirubin >50 μmol/L. - On POD 5, - patients who met this criterion had a 59% risk of early postoperative mortality, compared with 1.2% risk of mortality if the criteria were not fulfilled. - Biliary complications - 6 – 12% involve bile leaks leading to intra-abdominal sepsis
32
Adjuncts to Liver Resection
**Pre-operative Portal Vein Embolization** (**PO-PVE**): - Aim for redistribution of portal venous blood & hepatotropic factors to achieve substantial hypertrophy of non-embolized lobe of liver i.e. future remnant liver (FRL), resection planned in 4 weeks. - It also aims to reduce post-operative liver failure and prevent post-op portal hypertension. - - **Contraindications** - Overt portal hypertension (absolute) - Relative: tumor invasion of portal vein, occlusion of portal flow, biliary tree obstruction, mild portal hypertension, renal failure and uncorrected coagulopathy. - **Post embolization syndrome (PES):** Nausea, vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, haemobilia, hemoperitoneum, arteriovenous fistula, transient liver failure, subcapsular hemorrhage, portal vein thrombosis etc. **🔹 Why Does PES Happen?** PES occurs as a result of: **1) Tissue Ischemia & Necrosis:** PVE blocks blood flow to the embolized liver segments (usually the right lobe). This causes hepatocyte ischemia and localized necrosis, triggering inflammation. **2) Inflammatory Response & Cytokine Release:** The ischemic tissue releases pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6). This leads to systemic inflammatory symptoms like fever and leukocytosis. **3) Toxic Metabolite Release:** Necrotic hepatocytes release intracellular toxins, contributing to nausea, malaise, and pain. **4) Temporary Liver Dysfunction:** The liver needs time to adapt and regenerate (especially the future liver remnant, FLR). This may lead to transient elevation of liver enzymes (ALT, AST, bilirubin). **Pre-operative hepatic artery embolization**: - To reduce vascularity, induce tumor necrosis (reduce tumor volume) & limit spillage and vascular dissemination of viable tumor during resection, especially in primary HCC and neuroendocrine tumor. Both procedures can be achieved via Endovascular methods using (custom balloon occlusion catheters, fibrin glue, ethiodized oil, gelatin sponge, sclerosants, coils) or Surgical.
33
Management of BCLC A ( Early Stage) - Liver Transplantation
- Liver transplantation should be the treatment of choice for **transplant-eligible patients with early-stage HCC** occurring in the setting of clinically significant **portal hypertension and/ or decompensated cirrhosis**(Level2,Strong Recommendation). - Liver transplantation should be the treatment of choice for transplant-eligible patients with HCC that recur **within Milan criteria after surgical** resection (Level 3, Strong Recommendation). - The Milan criteria**(one lesion less than 5cm or two to three lesions between 1 and 3cm)** has been well established as the standard for optimal patient selection.
34
Management of BCLC B ( Intermediate stage) - Transarterial Therapy
- Patients with **BCLC Stage B** HCC should be treated with **transarterial chemoembolization** (Level 1, Strong Recommendation). - AASLD advises **radioembolization as an alternative therapy** to chemoembolization in patients with BCLC Stage B HCC (Level 3, Strong Recommendation). - Transarterial therapies should be **performed in a selective/segmental fashion** (over lobar treatment) whenever possible given a lower risk of hepatic dysfunction (Level 5, Strong Recommendation). - AASLD advises **against the combination of systemic therapy with transarterial therapies** for BCLC Stage B HCC outside of a clinical trial setting (Level 2, Strong Recommendation) - AASLD advises **systemic therapy** in patients with intermediate HCC who are unsuitable for or refractory to locoregional therapies **due to contraindications, worsening hepatic dysfunction, progression of HCC, or lack of objective response** (Level 3, Strong Recommendation)
35
How to evaluate response of the tumour post chemo?
- Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 is the standard tool to measure response and progression in oncology. - mRECIST criteria has been proposed to adapt RECIST criteria to particularities of HCC, enabling capture of antitumoral response without observed shrinkage after local and systemic therapies. - mRECIST has become the standard tool to assess radiological response after locoregional therapy for patients with early and intermediate stages of HCC, whereas both RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST are recommended for patients with advanced-stage HCC undergoing systemic therapy.
36
Overview of Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
**Trans arterial chemoembolization (TACE)** Rationale for TACE - HCC exhibits intense arterial neo-angiogenic activity during its progression, thus intra-arterial infusion of a cytotoxic agent followed by embolization of tumor-feeding blood vessels will result in a strong cytotoxic and ischemic effect targeted to the tumor since this tends to become entirely fed by arterial inflow, unlike the surrounding parenchyma which receives the majority of inflow through the portal system. **Indications** - Best candidates - patients with uni- or pauci-nodular disease without vascular invasion or metastases, who are asymptomatic and have a Child-Pugh stage of ≤B7. - Also used in early-stage HCC as a **bridge to liver transplantation** or when liver transplantation, hepatic resection, and image-guided ablation are not possible. - Super-selective chemoembolization is recommended to increase treatment efficacy and minimize the ischemic insult to non-tumoral tissue. **Contraindications** - Macrovascular invasion of main portal branches or main portal vein - **Impaired portal vein blood flow (portal vein thrombus, hepatofugal blood flow) an absolute contraindication**. - Patients with biliary-enteric anastomosis or biliary stent are at higher risk of hepatic abscess, other treatments preferred. - **Doxorubicin (anthracycline) may induce cardiotoxicity in a dose-dependent chronic cardiomyopathy.** Left ventricular ejection fraction should be checked by ECHO in patients receiving multiple TACE sessions and the cumulative dose should not exceed 450 mg/m. **🔹 Why Does Post-TACE Syndrome (PTS) Happen?** **1) Tumor Ischemia & Necrosis** TACE blocks the arterial blood supply to the tumor. This leads to tumor necrosis, causing local inflammation. **2) Inflammatory & Cytokine Response** Necrotic tumor cells release pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α). This triggers systemic inflammatory symptoms like fever and malaise. **3) Toxic Chemotherapy Effects** Chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., Doxorubicin, Cisplatin) cause local hepatocyte damage. This leads to liver dysfunction and nausea/vomiting. **4) Hypoxia & Tissue Injury** Blocked blood flow causes hypoxia in surrounding liver tissue. Nearby healthy liver cells may suffer collateral damage, increasing AST/ALT levels **🔹 Prevention of Post-TACE Syndrome** 🔸**Optimizing TACE Techniques:** Super-selective embolization (minimizing damage to normal liver). Use of drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) (reduces systemic chemo exposure). 🔸**Pre- & Post-TACE Liver Support:** Good hydration & nutrition. Avoid hepatotoxic drugs (e.g., high-dose paracetamol, alcohol). 🔸**Pre-Procedural Medications:** Steroids (optional) to reduce inflammation. Prophylactic antibiotics in high-risk patients (diabetes, cirrhosis) ✅ PTS is common (~50–80% of TACE patients). ✅ It is self-limiting (resolves in ~5–7 days). ✅ Supportive care (fluids, pain control, antiemetics) is the main treatment. ✅ Persistent fever & worsening pain → Consider liver abscess or biloma.
37
Conventional TACE ( Lipiodol TACE, cTACE)
nvolves transcatheter delivery of chemotherapy (Doxorubicin or Epirubicin, Cisplatin or Miriplatin) **emulsioned with Lipiodol**, followed by vascular stagnation achieved with particle embolization. - Better pharmacokinetic effect and long-term survival than injection of Lipiodol/drug emulsion without particles. - Common adverse events - liver enzyme abnormalities, fever, hematological/bone marrow toxicity, pain, and vomiting, related to **postembolization syndrome**.
38
Selective Internal RT (SIRT) / Radioembolization
**Selective Internal RT (SIRT) / Radioembolization** Infusion of radioactive 131-Iodine-labelled Lipiodol or resin or glass microspheres containing yttrium-90 (Y90) or similar agents into the hepatic artery which are preferentially delivered to the tumor-bearing area and selectively emit high-energy, low penetration ß-radiation to the tumor. **Contraindications** - Absolute - Lung shunting: Significant hepatopulmonary shunt >20%. - Relative - Compromised lung function, inadequate liver reserve & kidney function (Cr >2.0 mg/dL) & platelet < 75, portal vein thrombosis **Complications**: Post embolization syndrome. **Why is Lung Shunting a Contraindication for SIRT?** Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT), also known as radioembolization, uses **Yttrium-90 (Y-90)** microspheres to deliver targeted radiation to liver tumors. However, significant lung shunting can be a major contraindication due to the risk of radiation-induced lung injury. 🔹**What is Lung Shunting?** Lung shunting occurs when Y-90 microspheres bypass the liver and enter the pulmonary circulation via abnormal vascular connections between the liver and lungs. 🔹 **Why is Lung Shunting Dangerous in SIRT?** 1️⃣ Radiation Pneumonitis (RP) Y-90 delivers high-dose radiation to lung tissue. This can cause radiation pneumonitis, leading to cough, dyspnea, hypoxia, and fibrosis. 2️⃣ Pulmonary Fibrosis Chronic exposure to Y-90 radiation causes irreversible lung fibrosis. This can lead to respiratory failure over time. 3️⃣ Dose-Dependent Lung Toxicity Safe lung dose: <30 Gy Severe toxicity risk: >50 Gy If Lung Shunt Fraction (LSF) is too high, Y-90 dose adjustment is not enough to prevent toxicity.
39
Management of BCLC C ( Advanced stage) - systemic therapy
- **Systemic therapy** should be offered to patients with preserved liver function (Child Turcotte-Pugh A or well-selected Child-Tur cotte-Pugh B cirrhosis), ECOG PS 0-1, who have **BCLC Stage C HCC**, or **BCLC Stage B HCC not amenable to or progressing after locoregional therapy** (Level 1, Strong Recommendation). - Patients with advanced HCC who have **Child-Turcotte-Pugh A cirrhosis should be offered atezolizumab plus bevacizumab(avastin) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab as preferred first-line therapy options**(Level 2, Strong Recommendation). - Patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh A cirrhosis in **whom atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab are contraindicated should be offered first line sorafenib or lenvatinib** (Level 1, Strong Recommendation).
40
Trials pathways for systemic therapy
- **Sorafenib** effective in first line. - Multikinase inhibitor: Inhibitor of Raf kinase, inhibitor of RAF, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) - SHARP trial (Sorafenib HCC Assessment Randomized Protocol) shows survival benefit in late stage HCC. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2012.06.014] - **Regorafenib** effective in second line in case of radiological progression under sorafenib. - **Lenvatinib** non-inferior to sorafenib in first line, but no effective second line option after Lenvatinib has been explored. * The adverse effect reported with systemic therapies are hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, fatigue * No role of systemic chemotherapy as trials failed to demonstrate an increase in survival
41
BCLC D ( Terminal stage ) - Best supportive care
In HCC on cirrhosis: - Acetaminophen ≤3 g/day to manage pain of mild intensity - NSAIDs should be avoided whenever possible in patients with underlying cirrhosis. - Opioids to manage pain of intermediate or severe intensity (proactively avoid constipation) Bone metastases causing pain or at significant risk of spontaneous secondary fracture benefit from palliative radiotherapy.
42
What is Hepatorenal Syndrome?
43
Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS)
🔹**What is Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS)?** Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) is a severe functional kidney failure that occurs in patients with advanced liver disease (cirrhosis, acute liver failure, or severe alcoholic hepatitis). It is caused by extreme renal vasoconstriction due to systemic circulatory dysfunction and splanchnic vasodilation. 🚨 Key Features: No structural kidney damage. Reversible if treated early. Poor prognosis without treatment (often requiring liver transplant). 🔹 **Pathophysiology of HRS** 1️⃣ **Portal Hypertension & Splanchnic Vasodilation** Cirrhosis and portal hypertension cause vasodilation in the splanchnic circulation (gut, spleen, pancreas). This leads to systemic hypotension. 2️⃣ **Activation of Vasoconstrictor Systems** The body compensates by activating RAAS (Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System), Sympathetic Nervous System, and Vasopressin release. These mechanisms constrict renal arteries, reducing kidney perfusion. 3️⃣ **Severe Renal Hypoperfusion** The kidneys experience ischemia and low GFR, leading to functional kidney failure. Unlike acute kidney injury (AKI), there is no structural kidney damage. 🔹 **Management of HRS** 🚨**HRS Type 1 (Emergency Treatment)** 1️⃣ **Vasoconstrictors + Albumin (First-Line Treatment)** Terlipressin (preferred) OR Norepinephrine Albumin (1 g/kg IV on Day 1, then 40g/day) → Expands plasma volume. 2️⃣ **Liver Transplant (Definitive Treatment)** Best long-term option but limited by availability. 3️⃣**Dialysis (Temporary Support)** Used if severe electrolyte imbalances or acidosis. Does not improve survival without liver transplant. **✅ HRS Type 2 (Chronic but Progressive)** - Salt restriction + Diuretics (for ascites control). - Midodrine + Octreotide + Albumin (if hypotensive). - Liver transplant (definitive). 🔹**Prognosis of HRS** 🚨 Untreated HRS-1 → 80–90% mortality within weeks. ✅ Successful liver transplant → Best survival (>70% at 5 years)
44
Liver Transplant Criteria
🎯 **1. Milan Criteria (Established 1996 by mazzaferro – Gold Standard)** ✅ Eligibility: Single tumor ≤ 5 cm **OR** Up to 3 tumors, each ≤ 3 cm ❌ No macrovascular invasion ❌ No extrahepatic metastasis 📈 Outcome: ~75% 4-year survival ~85% recurrence-free survival 👉 Adopted by UNOS and most transplant centers globally 🏥 **2. UCSF Criteria (University of California, San Francisco – Expanded Criteria)** ✅ Eligibility: Single tumor ≤ 6.5 cm **OR** Up to 3 tumors, Largest ≤ 4.5 cm Total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cm ❌ No macrovascular invasion ❌ No extrahepatic disease 📈 Outcome: Comparable to Milan (~75% 5-year survival) Allows transplant for patients outside Milan but still within safe limits 🧮 Example 1 – Eligible (within UCSF): You have 3 tumors: Tumor 1: 3.0 cm Tumor 2: 2.5 cm Tumor 3: 2.0 cm Total = 3.0 + 2.5 + 2.0 = 7.5 cm ✅ Also, largest tumor ≤ 4.5 cm ✅ And total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cm ✅ → ✔️ This patient meets UCSF criteria 🔹 🧮 **3. Up-to-7 Criterion** – Definition: Sum of: ✅ Number of tumors + ✅ Diameter (in cm) of the largest tumor ➡️ Must be ≤ 7