Hip dysplasia - aetiopathogenesis, imaging Flashcards

1
Q

Alilovic AJVR 2023

Biochemical markers for HD in Tornjak dogs

A

Dogs with HD had lower HA, higher procollagen II c-terminal propeptide, MMP9

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Vidoni Animals 2022

Rads in 4mo investigated for HD using 4 quantitative (NA, DI, DARS, CEA) and 4 qualitative measures

A

High interobserver agreement for quantitative measures

using a combi of quantitative + clinical exam may increase accuracy of early dx of HD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Haney JAVMA 2020

PennHIP vs OFA for breeding selection in purpose-bred detection
615 dogs

A

hip joint scores were unchanged by use of OFA scores only

when both PennHIP and OFA were used for selection fo breeding stock, hip joint quality scores improved sig

sex and age were impt predictors of DI (females, young pups had more laxity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mostafa AJVR 2023

To develop quantitative measures, when combined with FCI scores, that may enhance accuracy of scoring process
153 GSDs normal and dysplasia

A

GSD with NA <103, CE <21, AFH <49 are not good breeding candidates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Klever VCOT 2024

Influence of femoral position and pelvic projection on NA

A

Tilted images that were evaluable had only little effect on NA - acceptable

DV not acceptable as NA falsely increased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Vandekerckhove VCOT 2024

Stress HD rads using Vezzoni device

A

95N
laxity index not affected by OA, weight, gender, side

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Goncalo Animals 2022

acetabular coverage using computer method (HCI)

A

there was a difference in mean HCI values among all FCI categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Klever VCOT 2020

NA vs DI
FCI vs Swiss scoring scheme (elements of BVA and FCI)

A

NA and DI both reliable
Swiss scoring more reliable for unexperienced observers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Carneiro VRU 2024

NA vs DI using OFA

A

Using DI, 12 normal, NA 24, OFA 29

phenotypically normal dogs with OFA may have passive hip laxity
DI can contribute to screening for HD in conjunction with OFA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pinna Animals 2022

Brass descriptive forms of primary radiographic signs of HD
- describing frequency according to each FCI grade

A

changes in acetabulum prevailed over those of femoral head only at beginning of HD, then worsened after changes occurred in femoral head and neck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Pinna Animals 2023
Characterisation of FCI grades for HD in Labs, GSDs, BMDs, Rotties
analysed using Brass method

A

No sig prevalence of radiographic features for any specific breed

but sig individual breed variations between dogs with and without dysplasia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly