HISTORIOGRAPHY Flashcards
(44 cards)
INDIAN REMOVAL
What was the significance of British dominance over vying French/Spanish colonial powers in the 18th century - Perde
- ‘set in motion a series of events which culminated in Indian removal in the 19th century’
INDIAN REMOVAL
Why did some Americans have a desire to civilise the Indians, and how did they go about this, in the late 18th century?
How successful were they?
Includes historiography (Perdu)
- Partly because of civilised they would give up traditional lifestyles and, therefore, their land
- But, Perdu argues, ‘genuine altruism motivated many whites’
HOWEVER - Most federal officials viewed the civilisation programme as a means to an end
- Federal gvt. provided funding for teaching Indians to be domestic/agricultural, and for missionary expeditions
SUCCESS?
- Little or no religious change, and Creeks resisted the establishment of a school
- However, some indoctrinated with Western values/cultural beliefs
- Leaders increasingly indoctrinated and others followed them
INDIAN REMOVAL Perdu on the significance of the Louisiana purchase
- “Thus the U.S. Governments removal policy officially was born”
INDIAN REMOVAL Why were ‘traditionalists’ (Perde) unwilling to leave?
- Westward migration was intended to be a safe haven for unassimilated Indians, but many who moved Westward were acculturated and migrated ‘for economic reasons’ (Perde)
INDIAN REMOVAL
Stuart Banner, How the Indians Lost their Land
on the long view of Indian Removal
- But most of the features of U.S. government policy that are conventionally thought to make up Indian removal were nothing new. If the 1830s were an era of removal, so too were the previous two centuries.
INDIAN REMOVAL
Stuart Banner, How the Indians Lost their Land
What did ‘removal’ mean to Americans in the 18th and 19th centuries?
Removal was an intransitive word simply meaning ‘to move’
EVIDENCE
Benjamin Franklin, Information to Those Who Would Remove to America 1782
INDIAN REMOVAL
What factors affected the rate of removal?
- Resistance
- Degree of acculturation
- Geographical area: Northern cities grew far quicker, so efforts to encourage removal were concentrated in Northern cities
INDIAN REMOVAL
Banner on the significance of Georgia to Indian Removal
Significant factor at play was when Georgia began to enact discriminative legislation. State vs federal power?
INDIAN REMOVAL
Banner on why Cherokees refused to leave?
- Economic pragmatism
- Had adopted Anglo-American agriculture
- Religious significance of land was equal across tribes. Agricultural value was the significant variable
INDIAN REMOVAL
Why do Banner and Perde take different views of consent?
- ‘Transient right of occupancy’ point overstated by Perde
EVIDENCE
- ‘The New England lawyer and re- former Jeremiah Evarts, essay, pub- lished under the pseudonym “William Penn” in the Washington Na- tional Intelligencer.
“the whole history of our nego- tiations with them, from the peace of 1783 to the last treaty to which they are a party, and of all our legislation concerning them, shows, that they are regarded as . . . possessing a territory, which they are to hold in full possession, till they voluntarily surrender it.”
EXCLUSION
Why, according to Zolberg, is ‘economic rationality’ an insufficient explanation for restrictionist legislation?
- Cheap chinese/immigrant labour was good for industrial elites - doesn’t necessarily make economic sense to halt it
- Lower class labourers had concerns about immigrant labour but they didn’t write the legislation
–> Needs to be further explanation
EXCLUSION
Who and why, according to Zolberg, advanced restrictionist regulations?
- Their linguistic and religious distance from
the hegemonic anglo-germanic, Protestant culture, was expected to make their assimilation into the mainstrea more difficult; and it was reckoned that the difficulty of Americanizing them would be compounded by the sheer mass of newcomers, as well as by that fact that many of them saw themselves as temporary migrants, who had little incentive or opportunity to adopt American ways.
The movement to restrict immigration was thus initiated by traditional social elites of the East Coast, and quickly gained widespread support among what would be termed in a later age the “silent majority’’.
EXCLUSION
What date does Zolberg give for the ‘reorientation’ of Immigration policy?
1896
In this year, both houses approve literacy test that would bar immigrants from southern/eastern Europe
Vetoed by successive presidents, but eventually passed in 1917
EXCLUSION
What was the long term implication of restrictionist legislation for American society, according to Zolberg?
Beyond this, the adoption of the “zero baseline norm” contributed to the naturalization of nativism, that is, of a cultural construction whereby national societies are viewed as self contained population entities with a common and homogeneous ancestry, growing by way of natural reproduction alone.
EXCLUSION
Erica Lee on anti-Chinese agitation as the reason for exclusion
Race was the ‘most important’ factor shaping immigration restriction and had the most significant implications for racialising immigrants later
EXCLUSION
Andrew Gyory, Closing the Gate - what does he view as the cause of exclusion?
Politicians - not California, not workers, not national racist imagery, ultimately supplied the Agency for Chinese exclusion
EXCLUSION
Calavita, Kitty, ‘Collisions at the Intersection of Gender, Race, and Class: Enforcing the Chinese Exclusion Laws’,
What haven’t some historians paid attention to?
- Says class ie how some Asians exempt from exclusion by occupation has been understated.
- Gender equally ignored
EXCLUSION
What does Ngai view as the ‘central theme’ of the process that led to the passage of the 1924 Act?
-The central theme of that process was a race-based nativism, which favoured the “Nordics” of northern and western Europe over the “undesirable races” of eastern and southern Europe
EXCLUSION
What, according to Ngai, were the long-term implications of the 1924 act?
The Immigration Act of 1924 thus established legal foundations for social processes that would unfold over the next several decades, processes that historians have called, for European immigrants, “becoming American” (or, more precisely, white Americans), while cast-
ing Mexicans as illegal aliens and foredooming Asians to permanent foreignness.
EXCLUSION
John Higham on the racial origins of nativism in Anglo-Americans
The origins of the racial theories regarding Europeans lay in what Higham calls the Anglo-Saxon nativist tradition, which held that Europeans of English or generally North European origin were the group that embodied the
best of the white race.
EXCLUSION
What factors does Lehtinen cite as the most important contemporary arguments for Immigration Restriction?
‘The debate on immigration restriction in the first half of the 1920s turned mainly on three questions: the economic impact of immigration, the danger
posed by foreign, radical ideas, and the racial character of the immigrants.’
EXCLUSION
What was the crucial difference between restrictionist arguments against ASIANS and SOUTHERN & EASTERN EUROPEANS?
What does Lihtinen think about the significance of racial attitudes to Europeans?
“It should be noted, however, that the significance of racial views regarding European immigration can be overstated.”
- Normally a mix of cultural and historical arguments rather than a ‘coherent racial ideology’
Judy Hefland on whiteness
Online Paper
Whiteness is shaped and maintained by the full array of social institutions–legal, economic, political, educational, religious, and cultural.
The dualism inherent in whiteness is clearly illustrated in the foregoing discussion of immigration policy. There are only two categories that matter–white and non-white. Whiteness is defined by determining who is not white
Henry Lopez on the significance of immigration restriction in the creation of whiteness
Haney Lopez, I. F. (1996). White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press.
‘… the categories of White and non-White became tangible when certain persons were granted citizenship and others were excluded. A “white” citizenry took on physical form, in part because of the demographics of migration, but also because of the laws and cases proscribing non-White naturalization and immigration.’