History Flashcards
(191 cards)
Why is knowing history important?
Knowing history will enable us to prevent us repeating past mistakes
What did George Santayana say/quote about history
He famously said, ‘those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it’
What about the character of Santayana indicated an inherent flaw about history
Santayana was a harvard professor, and in him saying this, it shows that:
Having good scientific roots are important when it comes to history
When from prestigious universities, your words are ‘important’
History is often based on authority because we have to believe someone –> potential to be flawed
Why is there a possibility that there is no such thing as ‘the history’ or the ‘historical truth’
GIve an example
Largely because history is written from different perspectives, so it is impossible to get an entirely objective perspective
I.e. finding books which tells the history of what happened after the 2nd world war from a western and eastern point of view –> differing perspectives depending on culture. As a result, there cant be an ABSOLUTE history
What is the role of forgetting and blending in memory in history
A main factor which can prevent an absolute history is the faultiness of both memory and also the presence of memory blending (when original info and misleading info can get blended together in the persons memory –> misinformation)
The interference by time, discussion, decay and forgetting and other later added (mis)information, can influence the miswriting of history–> hard to determine if the history written down is the actual history
What is presentist bias? Give examples
Presentist bias is the tendency to discuss and analyse past ideas, people and events in terms of the present
For example, when we have a negative perspective on looking at slavery in an era where the practice was acceptable, would be a presentist bias
Or viewing a traditional social structure as irrational, without considering that it may have been an efficient system that allows a community to survive
In other words, it is the invalid interpretation of the past using present day as a reference. Thinking about history only from the perspective of the present day
What is personal bias?
Personal bias refers to learned beliefs, opinions, or attitudes that people are unaware of and often reinforce stereotypes.
How can personal and presentist bias shape history
With regards to presentist bias, it emphasises the relevance of history to the present. Thus, things that don’t seem too relevant will be paid little attention –> excluding it from the ‘history books’ –> misleading portrayal of the past
Meanwhile, personal bias can influence history through influencing its reconstruction in accordance to the persons own preferences
What is the impact of Ibn Al - Haytham
He was also known as Alhazen
His most famous text which has been translated was ‘the optics of Ibn Al Haytham’
He helped discover the science of ‘optics’ and how we can see things
He helped revolutionise the study of optics and laid foundations for the scientific method
Discuss the bias/flaws present through the perspective of the west
Western perspective is the practice of viewing and presenting the world from a European or generally Western perspective. This limits our recording of history and understanding of other cultures
It focusses solely on the Western experience. As a result, it may lead to history having less of a focus on other cultures –> misrepresentation of history
What is zeitgeist? Give an example
Zeitgeist = ‘essence’ or ‘spirit’ of a particular time = ‘Spirit of the times’
In other words, it refers to the general intellectual, moral and cultural climate that is typical of an era
For example, the zeitgeist of England in the Victorian period included a belief in industrial progress
How does zeitgeist influence history?
Zeitgeist influences history as history will depict a certain period of time based on the zeitgeist of the time.
I.e. recognising the Victorian period as a period of industrial progress (becauuse that was the zeitgeist of the time)
How are names given to historical ‘facts’
Names typically evolve with tie, and are made much later.
I.e. WW1 was considered the Great war and the only war until WW2 occurred
Naming also relies on political ideological influences, as well as cultural/linguistic context
What is the general consensus of when Psychology started
Started with Wilheim Wundt when he established the first psychological lab in Lepzig in 1879. This is considered the official start of psychology as a separate and distinct scientific discipline
Often WIlliam James is mentioned as well
What is the flaw with asking when psychology started
However, the question is very open ended, and we can’t know the true answer.
Because for example, Wundt also had supervisors who also had supervisors, could they then be considered the start of psychology?
Additionally, a lot of other disciplines may be a part of psychology history. It’s not just limited to the formation of a psychological lab (i.e. trepanation)
Assess the statement that academic psychology is not the same as the start of ‘general’ psychology
This is because the general study of the mind (psychology) can be traced all the way back in history, for example to ancient philosophers who inquire about the nature of the mind, consciousness, and human behaviour, such as Aristotle, Plato and others. This can be considered the ‘general psychology’
However, the start of academic psychology (experimental psychology) wasn’t until Wilhem Wundt formed his first lab in 1879
What is the concept of structuralism?
Suggests that the goal of psychological research is to study the structure of the mind and consciousness.
Who was famous who supported structuralism?
Wilhem Wundt, and was built upon by his student Edward TItchener
How did Wilhem Wundt argue that structuralism should be studied?
Through a concept called introspection
What is introspection?
It is a technique to ‘look into the brain’ and its the search of the primitive experiences that constitute thought
How is introspection achieved?
Involves looking inward and examining one’s own conscious thoughts and experiences. By looking at the content of one’s own mind, you could gain insights into underlying structure of mental processes
Why was introspection complicated?
We had to name the building blocks of an object, which we might not have known the name of
Observers had to be highly trained
Looks at pure sensations; auditory, visual, tactile, and time
It is very subjective, and involves self reports on sensations, feelings, emotions etc.
Explain introspection through the example of a pencil
In this case, introspection would want the observer to describe the characteristics of a pencil, without reporting the name of the subject, but instead stating the ‘raw data’ such as the colour, hue, shape etc.
Who assisted Wundt in further spreading the idea of structuralism
His student; Edward Titchener(1867-1927), was a student of Wundt, and introduced structuralism and introspection to the americans