History Flashcards
(10 cards)
1
Q
What are the principles of the unwritten constitution
A
- Separation of powers
- Parliamentary sovereignty
- Rule of law
- Others = judicial review, Habeas Corpus
2
Q
Explain the 6 major milestones in UK history developing rights/freedoms
(HINTS* = MC, HC, BoR, TU, ECHR, HRA)
A
- Magna Carta (trial by peers)
- Habeas Corpus (fair detention)
- Bill of Rights (parliamentary sovereignty)
- Trade unions, women’s rights, civil campaigns
- UK ratified ECHR
- UK passed HRA 1998 (incorporated ECHR)
3
Q
Evaluate the development of rights and freedoms in the UK
A
- Time delays (Wainwright)
- Low volume of cases heard
- CJEU binding before brexit (Factortame)
- ECtHR only every pursuasive (Kay v Lambeth BC, Hirst v UK)
- UK must be compatible with HRA not ECHR
4
Q
What is the ECHR
A
- Living document
- International agreement
- Post WWII (divorce from humanity)
- Core set of fundamental rights
- Ratified by UK
- Mostly civil/political rights
- Overseen by council of Europe
5
Q
What is the ECtHR
A
- Dynamic institution
- Sits in Strasbourg, France
- 1 judge from every member state
- UK citizens could take cases there from 1966
6
Q
What was enforcing human rights in the UK like before the HRA
A
- Courts could not challenge primary statute under the ECHR
- Could declare secondary legislation ultra vires
- No duty to consider HR in judgements
- Citizens could go to ECtHR
- Public bodies could breach ECHR
7
Q
What notable cases were brought under the HRA
A
- Sunday Times v UK
- Maloney v UK
- Laskey/Jaggard/Brown v UK
8
Q
Explain the provisions of the HRA
A
- S.1 = ECHR provisions
- S.2 = ECtHR form pursuasive precedent (Kay v Lambeth BC)
- S.3 = interpret law in line with HR (Bellinger v Bellinger)
- S.4 = declaration of incompatability
- S.6(1) = PA can act against ECHR if allowed by law (PA = any body functioning on behalf of the state: Donogue v Poplar Housing, Leonard Cheshire Homes, Johnson v Havering LBC)
- S.7 = person with standing can bring action to Ct
- S.8 = domestic Ct can grant remedies
- S.10 = govt can fast track HR legislation
- S.19 = new legislation must comply with HR
9
Q
Explain the entrenched nature of the ECHR
A
- Not fully entrenched (parliament not bound by own decisions)
- Would be hard to repeal as in so many laws
- Repealing would cause problems with devolved powers
- Must consult devolved nations before repealing
10
Q
Evaluate the Human Rights Act 1998
A
- Pros
–> Access to enforce HR more easily
–> Encourage conformity
–> Avoid conflict (between domestic and international Cts)
–> Improve awareness
–> ECHR is tried and tested
–> Future statute must comply
–> Interpretation in line with ECHR promotes individual rights and prevents arbitrary abuse of state power - Cons
–> Diminished parliamentary sovereignty
–> Gives more power to unelected judiciary
–> Limits ability to enforce punishments
–> Uncertainty in interpretation by devolved nations - Important of Commission for HR
–> Advise/ guide/ bring cases/ conduct enquiries/ monitor domestic legislation/ scrutinse new law/ publish regular reports - Reform
–> 2015 tory manifesto (replace with British Bill of Rights to prevent foreign nationals using HRA to stay in UK and stop ECHR overruling parl sov)
–> UKSC replace ECtHR as final HR arbitrator (6 years to get to Strasbourg)