History of Cognition Flashcards
(39 cards)
With what disciplines deals cognitive psychology?
- Mind
- Behaviour
- Behaviour
What is the mind?
- Fire
- Spirit
- Soul
- Consciousness
- Intellect
- Anima (Greeks)
- Ātman (Hindu Philosophy)
- Dasein (German Philosophy)
- Experience
There is no good definition of cognition because it depends on the philosophical stance of the respondent.
What can we say in general?
Cognition is about knowing.
Inherently a relation between the knower and the known.
Who dominated the Pre-Socratic philosophy?
Heraclitus (500 BC):
- Things are constantly changing
- Universal flux; A reality exists and persists by virtue of constant change of its parts
- You can step in the same river, but not the same water
Parmenides of Elea (5th century BC):
- Wrote a complex metaphysical poem
- Universal stasis; to exist is not to change
How did Aristotle ( 384-322 BCE) influence cognitive theory ?
- Devices a method of correct reasoning-logic: - an argument in which, when certain things are laid down, something else follows of necessity in their virtue of their being so
- Deductive Reasoning- Syllogisms
- Required the conviction of universal constants or truths
Associationism involves Aristotle‘s law on remembrance and recall.
Which 4 components does it contain?
- The law of contiguity (Things or er events that occur close to each other in space or time tend to get linked together in the mind)
- The law of frequency (The more often two things or events are linked, the more powerful will be the association)
- The law of similarity (If two things are similar, the thought of one will tend ti trigger the thought of the other)
- The law of contrast (Seeing or recalling something may also trigger the recollection of something completely opposite)
What did René Descartes (1596-1650),
who was a catholic rationalist who wanted to establish a foundation for the true and certain knowledge, state sbout the perceived world?
‚So after considering everything thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived by my mind‘ (Meditation 2, AT 7:25).
How did Descartes (1596-1650) create the mind-body-problem?
He said that:
- The ‚I‘ is durable - soul / cogito / mind
- Mental phenomena and the physical structures on which they depend seem qualitatively different
- The mental and the physical are made of different stuff - dualist approach
- but they do interact!
—> this creates the mind-body problem for subtance dualism
Descartes (1596-1650) viewed the body as a mechanical system, an automata, that obeys physical laws.
It was not until Isaac Newton (1642-1727) that these physical laws were described. What became the question then?
The question becomes ‚What are the laws for the mental world?‘
This would be the first and foremost question for the scientific field, called psychology.
How was Empiricism developed?
- John Locke (1632-1704, English)
- George Berkley (1685-1753, Irish)
- David Hume (1711-1776, Scottish)
—> Contrary to Descartes, all knowledge is seen as grounded in the experience of the world mediated by senses; knowledge through engagement with the world
What is Molyneux’s question?
‘Suppose a man born blind, and now adult, and taught by his touch to distinguish between a cube, and a sphere of the same metal, and nighly of the same bigness, so as to tell, when he felt one and t’other, which is the cube, which is the sphere.
Suppose then the cube and the sphere placed on a table, and the blind man to be made to see. Quære, whether by his sight, before he touched them, he could now distinguish, and tell, which is the globe, which is the cube (Locke, 1694/1979).’
What happened to Associationism during the Enlightenment?
- Associations were seen as part of passive reason, not active reason, such as abstraction
- Locke assumed that complex ideas form for associating simple ideas and simple reflections
- Hume: all coherence are due to laws of resemblance and contiguity
What are the keypoints of Rationalism and Empiricism?
Rationalism:
- Innate knowledge
- Reason and deduction
- Certainty
- a priori
Empiricism:
- Tabala rasa
- Inference and induction
- Tentative knowledge
- a posteriori
How did Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) attempt to synthesise the insights of the rationalist and empiricist views?
- Regarded space and time as a priori of experience, and grounding the notion of cause and effect
- The natural laws can not be applied to living creatures, including humans
- Therefore psychology as a science is not possible
Kant agreed with the scepticism about what the senses provide and therefore we can never know about the world itself, as all information is relayed through our senses. Thus, there is no direct knowledge of the world. Any knowledge that is gathered is limited by the person’s senses. Even when using sophisticated equipment, reading the measurements still requires the senses. The objective study of the mind, in the same way as physics is an objective science, it is not possible.
What does Kant’s in regards to psychology as a transcendental subject state?
- We can never know about the world in itself, as all information is relayed through our senses
- There is no direct knowledge of the world
- Any knowledge is limited by the person’s senses
- Objective study of the mind impossible
How did John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) extend the associationist reach?
- A sensory impression leaves a mental representation (idea or image)
- If two stimuli are presented together repeated, they create an association in the mind
- The intensity of such a pairing can be serve the same fuction as repetition
- Associations can have attributes different from the parts
- Going beyond Hume, Mill argues that through generalisation more knowledge can be obtained beyond experience
- The scientific method
- Hypothetico-deductive method
- Psychology will never be an exact science
The scientific methods have had many successful applications in various fields and facilitated the industrial revolution.
Why was there not such a revolution in the study of human cognition?
There are two reasons that can be found:
1) Darwin and medical scientists argued that animals and humans are on a continuum in a physical sense. By studying the human mind in the same way as studying a muscle or an animal was heretical.
2) There is a tension within psychology. Psychology studies behaviour, which objectively measurable (although variable), and the experience that a person has, which is subjective. Assuming that the physical entity produces both behaviour and experience means the soul comes from the body. This was a very dangerous position to hold and hence researchers interested in the mind tried to study the mind without antagonising the establishment.
What researchers did was to focus on the parts of the body, using scientific method.
The research programme being that by researching the body in minute detail, there will be a time when the mental experience can be tested or recast in physical terms.
What did Helmholtz, Fechner and Wundt do, using this perspective?
- Helmholtz measures the speed of neural signal transmission (at 30 meters/second), 1849.
- Fechner published a book that aimed to quantitatively relate the objective quantities to subjective sensations and perceptions, 1860.
- Wundt established a laboratory dedicated to this type of research, 1979.
Who influenced early psychology research?
1849: Hermann von Helmholtz first measures speed of neural signal transmission (ca. 30 meters per second).
1860: Gustav Fechner publishes ‘Elemente der Psychophysik’ seeking to quantitatively relate measurable quantities to subjective sensations.
1879: Wilhelm Wundt establishes laboratory in Leipzig, Germany
Which methods were adopted in early research?
- analysis (reason) - armchair work
- psychophysics
- experiments
- introspection
—> not psychodynamics - not a scientific approach
Psychophysics establish the lawful relation between measurable properties such as a pitch.
How do you find out what someone perceives?
Ask them:
- judge if 2 stimuli are identical or not
- find just noticeable differences (JND)
- adjust two stimuli until they appear to be equal
What did Ernst Weber (1795-1878) find out in regards to psychophysics?
- using JND he found out that people can distinguish between 40 pound weight in one hand from 41 pound weight in the other hand
- and a 20 pound weight from a 20.5 pound weight
- people can perceive a 1/40 pound difference
—> Weber’s Law
How did Gustav Fechner (1801-1887) developed Weber’s law?
He added his own analysis to it. So according to Weber’s law the ratio of the two weights that are Just distinguishable is a constant. Fechner’s law links the subjective sensation of the weight to the physical quantity of the weight. This makes it possible to have psychology as an activity of scientific inquiry. Thus, the science of psychology is indeed possible in the same way that physics as a science is possible.
Weber’s law: *R/R = k
Fechner’s law: S = k Log R
—> Sensation has a direct mathematical relation with a physical quantity
—> Psychology as an activity of scientific inquiry could be possible!
Who was Wilhem Wundt (1832-1920)?
- Wundt was influenced by Leibnitz (parallelism)
- Assistant of von Helmholtz
- Only considers conscious activities (unit)
- Psychology can not be reduced to physiology
- Physical and mental states exist in different reference systems