Housebreaking And Kndred Offences Flashcards

1
Q

What are the proofs of Section 112?

A

(1) Breaking by the accused
(2) Entry by the accused
(3) A dwelling-house (or any other building)
(4) Commit the serious indictable offence as charged OR

Alternatively, 112(1)(b), whilst the accused was in such a building:
(A) He or she committed a serious indictable offence, and
(B) Then broke out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two types of break?

A

Actual or

Constructive which ca be by:

  • Threats
  • Fraud
  • Conspiracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is actual breaking?

A

Was a seal of some kind broken?
-Opening a closed by unfastened door?
YES (R v Brown)

-Raising a closed but unfastened window?
YES (R v Hyams)

-Opening a cellar flap held down only by its own weight?
YES (R v Russell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What about if the window or door was partly open?

A

No, it does not count as breaking the seal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does it have to be an external seal?

A

No (R v Johnson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What about permission?

A

Ghamrawi et al v R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the proof for Entry by the Accused?

A
  • Any part of the offender’s body.
    • However small (R v Davis)

-If using an instrument only, must be for the purpose of accomplishing the serious indictable offence. (R v Rust and Ford)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In Section 112 Occupation of the dwelling house?

A
  • Can only break and enter the swelling house of ANOTHER, not your own
  • Occupation, to ownership. A landlord CAN be liable for breaking and entering premises occupied by his tenant.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a serious indictable offence?

A

Punishable by life or five years or more

Examples:
Larceny
Destroy/damage property
Sexual touching
AOABH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are circumstances of Aggravation?

A

For the purposes of paragraph (f) of the definition of ‘circumstances of aggravation’, if there was a person, or there were persons, in the place in relation to which an offence is alleged to have been committed at the time it was committed, the defendant is presumed to have known that fact unless the defendant satisfies the court that he or she had reasonable grounds for believing in that there was no one in the place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What about circumstances of special aggravation?

A

Means circumstances involving either or both of the following:
(A) the alleged offender wounds or intentionally or recklessly inflicts grievous bodily harm on any person,
(B) the alleged offender is armed with a dangerous weapon.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a dangerous weapon?

A

Dangerous weapon means—

(a) a firearm, or an imitation firearm, within the meaning of the Firearms Act 1996, or
(b) a prohibited weapon within the meaning of the Weapons Prohibition Act 1998, or
(c) a spear gun.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What about alternative verdicts?

A
  • As mentioned in Section 115(A) allows for alternative verdicts in specified housebreaking offences to be found in a descending level of aggravation.
  • An aggravated offence may be reduced to its basic form.
  • A specifically aggravated offence may be reduced to its aggravated form or its basic form, but a basic offence cannot be ‘bumped up’ to its aggravated or specifically aggravated form.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does it mean to be armed?

A

Miller v Hrvojevic
To be armed with a weapon means something more than to be in possession of it; the weapon must also be available for immediate use as a weapon. A man is armed with a pistol if he is wearing it in a holster, though perhaps not if it is in the boot of his car. It is not necessary for it to be in his hand for him to be armed with it. In the present case the knuckle duster was in the defendant;s left-side trouser pocket, where it could easily and rapidly be slipped onto his hand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Section 113?

A

Break, Enter with intent to commit a SIO

  • Same proofs as S112 - except rather than commit a SIO, they must have intended to commit a SIO (not necessary that SIO was accomplished)
  • Have to prove ‘intent’
  • ‘Intent’ has to e contemporaneous with the breaking and entering - not arise after in house
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Section 114?

A

Being armed with intent to commit IO

17
Q

What is Section 148?

A

Stealing property in a dwelling-house

  • Whosoever steals in a dwelling house any property shall be liable to imprisonment for seven years
  • Must be under the ‘Protection of the House’ (R v Fry)
  • The word ‘steals’ is used in this section and not ‘commits larceny’. It is therefore submitted that the section contemplates any form of dishonest taking, as for example larceny that is a serious indictable offence and those statutory stealings that are minor indictable offences.