HOW MUCH GOES TO Flashcards
LEARN TO SOLVE HOW MUCH EACH WILL GET (44 cards)
A instituted B and C as his
heirs. Without designating their specific shares
B and C shall inherit
equally, that is 50-50.
: Estate is 100,000. A is a
compulsory heir. He was instituted together
with B and C.
A will first get the 50,000 as
his legitime. The remaining 50,000 will be divided to the three of them as instituted
heirs.
Estate is 120,000. A B C
were instituted with 30,000 each.
The total is 90,000. The remaining
30,000 will be distributed to the three. So, they will get 40,000 each
Estate is 90,000, A B C and
were instituted with 40,000 each
reduce 10,000 each.
I hereby institute as my only heirs A,
B, and C each one to get ¼ of my
estate.
The ¼ still undistributed
should clearly be divided
proportionately equally among A,B,&
C since this is the evident intention of
the testator.
T instituted A (his son), B and C, to
an estate of P300,000.00.
A gets as
legitime ½ of the estate or
P150,000.00. The remaining
P150,000.00 will be divided equally among A, B, & C. Thus, A gets
P200,000.00 – P150,000.00 as legitime, P50,000.00 as instituted heir.
I institute as my heirs A, B, and the
three children of C to my estate of
P100,000.00
. In this case the three
children of C will get P20,000.00
each.
T instituted A and A’s two children to
an estate of P30,000.00.
Each of the
three heirs gets P10,000.00 ALL at the same time.
WHAT KIND OF INSTITUTION: A instituted B as heir provided that B
passes the bar examination for 2022.
institution of an heir with a
condition
WHAT KIND OF INSTITUTION
A instituted B as heir, which will take
effect on January 2022.
institution of an heir with a
term
WHAT KIND OF INSTITUTION: A gave P300,000.00 so that the same may be spent for the interment of C, the late husband of A.
Example of modal institution
A instituted B as an heir on
the condition that B would learn how
to drive the car.
This must be fulfilled
as soon as possible after A’s death. If B already knows how to drive, it is
understood that he inherits the same.
A gives B a legacy on
condition that C wins the lotto draw.
The fulfillment may be either before or after A’s death. If C had already won the lotto and A DID NOT KNOW
this, the condition is deemed already complied with, and B gets the legacy.
However, if A KNEW ABOUT IT (C’s lotto winning), the condition is deemed fulfilled only if C wins again.
A gives B a legacy on
condition that B becomes a lawyer.
The condition may be fulfilled either before or after the death of A. If B is already a lawyer and A DID NOT KNOW this, the condition is deemed complied with and B gets the legacy. If A KNEW THIS, B gets the legacy just the same, because the condition is of such nature that it can no longer be complied with again.
A institutes B as heir on
condition that B should not smoke
for one year.
He gets the inheritance
right away but he must first give a security to guarantee he would not smoke for a period of one year. In
case he does smoke again within said period he should return whatever he
may have received, together with its
fruits and interest.
Estate is $500M. A B and C are
siblings. A got $50M as donation. Is there a
preterition?
NO, because A was not totally omitted because he received a donation. A
can DEMAND the remaining value of his legitime. The donation is an ADVANCE of
his inheritance which is deductible from his legitime.
If the estate is P180,000, A is
instituted to P120,000; B to P20,000;
and C to P40,000. Since B and C are
made substitutes of A, WHAT WILL HAPPEN?
if substitution is proper, B and C will get A’s P120,000 in the proportion of P20,000 is to P40,000 (or in the
proportion of 1 is to 2). Hence, in the substitution, B gets P40,000 and C
gets P80,000.
A instituted B to 2/3 and C to 1/3. If B predeceases, is incapacitated, or
renounces, WHAT WILL HAPPEN?
his share of 2/3 goes to C.
If C predeceases, is incapacitated, or
renounces his share of 1/3 goes to B.
A institutes B as first heir. The will states that B should preserve and transmit later on the Estate to C, who
is B’s son, EXPLAIN
. It is clear here that upon
A’s death, B will inherit. Later on, B will have to deliver the property to C who has also inherited as the second heir. In other words, in the fideicommisary substitution, both heirs inherit.
Estate is 100M. Heirs: Legitimate child, 10 illegitimate children.
LC – 50M
IC – 5M each (=50M)
How do you get the exact value of
the legitime?
Get the total estate (gross) minus
the debts and obligations and add the
collationable donations and get the ½ as
the legitime
If the testator donated a property
to the wife of his son exclusively, can it be
collated?
It is not collationable.
What if was donated to the son and his wife jointly? Can it be collated?
Only the part of the son is
collationable. The part of the wife is an exclusive property and the wife is stranger
to the testator.
Surviving Spouse and Illegitimate Children, how much is the legitime?
TOTAL: 2/3 of Net Estate
Surviving Spouse – 1/3
Illegitimate Children – 1/3