HR Staffing Test 2 Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

Z-Score

A

(x-mean)/std

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

coefficient alpha/internal consistency (OBJECTIVE measure)

A

correlates one measure with all others on a test. Should be at .7 to be acceptable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

test-retest reliability (OBJECTIVE measure)

A

should score the same if taking at different points in time; evaluates the amount of situational error
Should be between .5-.9 to be acceptable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

INTRArater reliability (SUBJECTIVE measure)

A

same person at 2 points in time

Should be above .8 to be acceptable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

INTERrater reliability (SUBJECTIVE measure)

A

different person at 2 points in time

similar to test-retest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

reliability vs. validity

A
reliability = consistency
validity = measure truly measures the attribute it was intended to (accuracy of measurement AND prediction)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

relationship of reliability and validity

A

squareroot of reliability is the MAX validity (validity of 1 is out of the picture)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

two types of validation studies

A

job-related validation: compares test to actual job performance
content validation: correlation is “guessed” “Yep, that looks like it measures ______”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

concurrent vs. predictive validation designs

A

concurrent - correlate job performance and test scores of current employees
predictive - give to job applicants, don’t use in hiring decision, use performance of new hires to correlate with scores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 times to use content validation

A

1) when there are too few people to form a sample for criterion/job-related validation measures
2) when criterion measures are not available
* can be supported by validity generalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

situation-specific validity vs. validity generalization

A

situation specific - different validity test for every situation
generalization - combine all validation studies to come up with a general validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Resume and Cover Letters (INITIAL)

A
  • applicant controlled
  • falsification
  • lack of research on validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Application Blanks (INITIAL)

A
  • organization controlled
  • information requested should be critical to job success and reflect relevant KSAOs
  • overall: weak indicator
  • level of education: (t matter
    • med: significant for 5 years, then weak
    • high: significant for 10 years, then weak
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Biodata (INITIAL)

A
  • high test-retest reliability
  • moderate validity (0.35)
  • not clear what it assesses (hard to generalize)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reference Check (INITIAL)

A
  • moderate to high with structured questions

- (from .26 unstructured to .4 w/ structure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Interview (INITIAL)

A
  • check for minimum requirements and “broad stuff”

- little evidence about usefulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Unstructured Interview vs. Structured Inteview (SUBSTANTIVE)

A
Unstructured:
-r=0.38, moderate, but could be better
-done by small/med organizations
Structured:
-r=0.5, high
18
Q

BARS

A

behaviorally anchored rating scale (predetermined rating scale)

19
Q

Personality Test (SUBSTANTIVE)

A
  • focus on Big 5; can capture 75% of personality

- correlation broken down by each factor

20
Q

Extraversion (part of personality test)

A
  • best for jobs with large social component and getting ahead is important
  • low for sales and training
  • moderate for leadership
21
Q

Emotional Stability (part of personality test)

A
  • “getting along” behaviors at work
  • low across all jobs
  • slightly higher but still low for teamwork and leadership
22
Q

Agreeableness (part of personality test)

A
  • “getting along” behaviors at work
  • moderate for customer service or teams
  • best big 5 for teamwork
23
Q

Conscientiousness (part of personality test)

A
  • best big 5 across all jobs for performance
  • “getting things done”
  • moderate for work-related motivation
24
Q

Openness to Experience (part of personality test)

A
  • not really related to overall job performance
  • moderate for training
  • low for leadership (challenge status quo)
25
Cognitive Ability Tests (SUBSTANTIVE)
- BEST single predictor availabile - validity exceeds .5 (high) - highest for high complexity jobs - moderate for low complexity jobs
26
Emotional Intelligence (ability test)(SUBSTANTIVE)
weak predictor
27
Psychomotor Ability Test (SUBSTANTIVE)
dexterity, body movement, precision, etc. | -high correlation with jobs that need these things
28
Physical Ability Test (SUBSTANTIVE)
muscular strength, movement quality, etc. - high correlation with jobs that need these things - huge std between genders
29
Sensory/Perceptual Ability Test (SUBSTANTIVE)
ability to detect environmental stimuli - high correlation with jobs that need these things - does not add to general cognitive ability
30
Job Knowledge Test (SUBSTANTIVE)
- test knowledge of duties involved or level of experience with job tasks - must have different test for EVERY job - high validity
31
Performance Test vs. Work Sample (SUBSTANTIVE)
Performance Test = all of the job Work Sample = part of the job -both can have high validity
32
high vs. low fidelity
``` high = more real (having a cash drawer and working through transactions) low = less real (paper and pencil test) ```
33
Situational Judgement Test
- hybrid of ability test and work sample - moderate to high validity - doesn't necessarily "add" anything
34
Integrity Test (SUBSTANTIVE)
Propensity to steal/Counterproductive behavior -Clear/overt items=high correlation -personality-based/veiled items=moderate correlation Job performance: -overt and veiled both have moderate correlation
35
Interest, Values and Preference Inventories (SUBSTANTIVE)
- activities employees prefer to do on and off the job - Myers-Briggs - weak predictor
36
DISCRETIONARY methods
- assess person/organization match - motivation level - citizenship behaviors - Factors OTHER THAN ksaos - subjective
37
Peter Principle
People are promoted to their lowest level of incompetence. Have a bunch of people who can't do their job - entire organization suffers
38
Assessment Centers (INTERNAL)
-validity of 0.37 (moderate)
39
Initial Internal selection measures
- talent management/succession systems - peer assessments - self-assessments - managerial sponsorship - informal discussions and recommendations
40
Substantive Internal selection measures
- seniority and experience - job knowledge tests - performance appraisal - promotability rating - assessment centers - promotion panel
41
5 sources of contamination error
1) content domain - irrelevant material on test 2) standardization - different time limits for same test 3) chance response tendencies - guessing by test taker 4) rater - rater gives inflated ratings to people 5) rating situation - interviewees are asked different questions