HRLP - Interpersonal Relationships Flashcards
formation of relationships, communication, why relationships end (54 cards)
formation of relationships
process through which individuals develop emotional, romantic or social bonds based on bio, cog, or socio factors (romantic, platonic, familial)
bio studies of relationships
Buss
Wedekind
cog studies of relationships
Markey & Markey
Hazen & Shaver
socio studies of relationships
Moreland & Beach
Buss
role of communication studies
Bradbury & Finchman
Gottman
why relationships change/end studies
Bradbury & Finchman
Gottman
bio theory of attraction
rooted in evolutionary theory; suggests that mate preferences develop to maximize reproductive success
natural selection
traits that enahnce survival increase likelihood of individual living long enough to reproduce
sexual selection
facet of natural selection, a best mate is chosen to produce & protect most healthy offspring
intrasexual competition
members of same sex compete for potential mate (males)
intersexual selection
one sex selects based on desirable traits (females)
Buss (1989) study summary
aim: to understand mate preferences across cultures & alignment with evolutionary predictions
procedure: cross cultural survey, 10000 participants, 33 countries, ranking importance of certian characteristics in potential mate (chastity, financial stability, wealth, health, ambition, fertility, etc.)
results: females prioritize financial stability & ambition = provision of resources for offspring
Males prioritize young age, physcial attractiveness and health = fertility
conclusion: findings support evolutionary theory
evaluation of Buss (1989)
large diverse sample
generalizable
self report bias
social desirability bias
study overlooks personality, shared interest, etc. = other factores which are not biological
Wedekind (1995) study summary
aim: to study how major histocompatibility genes impact attraction
procedure: men wore t-shirts for 2 days, women rated odor based on sexiness and pleasantness
results: women preferred the scent of MHC dissimalr men when ovulating, and MHC similar men when menstrating
conclusion: MHC dissimalr = more diverse gene pool , healtheir offspring
Wedekind (1995) study evaluation
standardized condition minimizes confounding variables (ex. judging based on physical attractiveness)
MHC genes
major histocompatibility genes
role of MHC genes
large group of genes responsible for the development of the immune system
diff genes produces diff infections
healthiest individuals have most diverse set of MHC genes bc immune system can fight diseases
MHC dissimilar genes indicates offspring health
bio explanantion of attraction critical thinking
cross cultural studies enhance generalizability
modern studies link evolution to hormonal/neural mechanisms
overlook cog & socio
ignore cultural bias
does not account for non-reproductive relations (homo)
cog theory of attraction
thoughts, beliefs, and mental processes shape how personal relationships are approached
similarity ttraction model
ppl attracted to ppl who are similar to them
attachment theory
schemas of relationships are developed in early childhood
types of attachment
secure
avoidant
anxious
anxious-avoidant
internal working model
attachments formed based on experience = attachment to caregiver & expectations influence perception of relationships
Markey & Markey study summary
aim: to investigate the extent to which similarity is a factor in choosing a partner
procedure: 108 heterosexual couples, questionnaire abt their own characteristics and their partner’s
results: participants described themselves similarily to the way in which they described their partners, most loving relationships found that there was some similarity present but also some differences
conclusion: supporting similarity-attraction model, seek those similar to us