Human rights intro Flashcards

(14 cards)

1
Q

LIBERTIES vs RIGHTS
Q: What is the key difference between a liberty and a right?

A

A: A liberty means something is permitted because it is not prohibited by law; a right is something specifically granted by law and may require positive action from the state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Q: Which case discusses the UK’s concept of constitutional liberties?

A

A: Wheeler v Leicester City Council [1985] — Lord Browne-Wilkinson explained that freedoms in the UK are often residual, not explicitly granted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

TYPES OF RIGHTS
Q: What are absolute rights under the ECHR?

A

A: Rights that cannot be restricted under any circumstances (e.g., Article 3 – prohibition of torture).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Q: What are qualified rights under the ECHR?

A

A: Rights that can be interfered with, provided the interference is lawful, pursues a legitimate aim, and is necessary in a democratic society (e.g., Articles 8–11).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CASE LAW – ARTICLE 3 (Prohibition of Torture)
Q: What case involved judicial birching and Article 3?

A

A: Tyrer v UK (1978) – judicial corporal punishment was ruled degrading.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Q: Which case ruled deportation to the US could violate Article 3?

A

A: Soering v UK (1989) – risk of death row in the US breached Article 3.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Q: What case confirms deportation cannot occur if torture is likely?

A

A: Chahal v UK (1996) – even for national security risks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Q: Which recent case upheld non-deportation on torture grounds?

A

A: R (AAA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

CASE LAW – ARTICLE 8 (Private & Family Life)
Q: Which case dealt with right to care home residence?

A

A: R (Coughlan) v North and East Devon Health Authority [1999].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Q: Which case concerned public CCTV footage disclosure?

A

A: Peck v UK (2003) – found a breach of privacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Q: What case involved deportation and rehabilitation under Article 8?

A

A: AA v UK (2011) – deportation was disproportionate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q: Which case advanced trans rights under Article 8?

A

A: Goodwin v UK (2002) – legal recognition and right to marry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Q: What recent climate case is relevant to Article 8?

A

A: KlimaSeniorinnen v Switzerland (2024) – insufficient action on climate change breached Article 8.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly