I - Ethics, Professional Responsibilities, Federal Tax Procedures Flashcards

(66 cards)

1
Q

Circular 230 SubPar A Section 103 provides that a certified public accountant who is not suspended or disbarred..

A

may practice by filing a written declaration that they’re qualified and is authorized to represent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who may practice before the IRS?

A
attorneys
cpa
enrolled agent
enrolled actuary
enrolled retirement plan agents (limited to employee plans)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Practicing before the IRS includes

A
preparing documents
filing documents
corresponding w/irs 
written advice with regard to transactions that have potential for tax avoidance or evasion
representing client
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what section for contingent fees

A

section 10.27

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

when can contingent fee be charged

A

IRS examination or challenge to original tax return or amended
claim for refund filed (only for interest and penalties)
when representing client in judicial proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Circular 230 Subpart C Section 10.50

A

monetary penalty on practitioners. max penalty 100% gross income, can be added to the 50% penalty of gross income from Section 6694

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Circular 230 Subpart C Section 10.51

A

acts of disreputable conduct - includes conviction of crimes, willfully evading taxes, being disbarred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which section is understatement of taxpayer liability

A

Section 6694

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Section 6694 (a) punishes understatement for:

A

unreasonable position = if no substantial authority = <40% chance of being challenged
penalty is greater of 1k or 50% income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Section 6694(b) punishes understatement for:

A

willful or reckless understatement.

Penalty is greater of 5K or 75% income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

which section abuses TRPs for abusive tax shelters

A

Section 6700.

Punish if promote, organize or participate in, engage in gross overvaluation (2x)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3 unreasonable positions

A

no substantial authority (40%) for position
no reasonable basis (20%) for disclosed position
no more likely than not (50%) for tax shelter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the penalty for fraudulent understatement

A

75% of understatement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

a substantial understatement on an individual return =

A

greater of 10% of the tax or 5k

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

a substantial understatement for a c corp

A

lesser of 10% of tax, 10k, or 10M

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Form used to disclose a tax position

A

form 8275 or 8275-R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

a plaintiff must prove the following elements in order to win a breach of contract suit:

A

1 - existence of an enforceable contract (oral contract usually ok)
2 - plaintiff client complied with contracted obligations
3 - defendant accountant breached the contract (may be intentional)
4 - damages were caused by the breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

burden of proof needed for most civil cases

A

preponderance of evidence (more likely true tan not true > 50%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

statute of limitations for breach of contract

A
oral = 2 years
written = 4 years from breach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

3 defenses to breach of contract claims

A

statue of limitations, justifiable breach, substantial performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

4 elements of a cause of action for professional negligence

A

1 - accountant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff
2- defendant breached the standard of care
3 - breach proximately caused injury
4 - client suffered damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

how does a breach proximately cause an injury?

A

2 parts: factual and legal

“but for” the accountant’s breach, loss would not have occured. and if injury was reasonably foree result of breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

the main difference between negligent misrepresentation claim and negligence claim:

A

plaintiff relied on the information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

basic elements of fraud claim

A

1 - misrepresentation or omission of fact (includes false statement of expert opinion)
2 - materiality
3 - accountant knew or recklessly endangered the falsity (scienter)
4 - there was reasonable reliance
5 - damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
other word for knew or recklessly disregarded the falsity
scienter = knowledge = actual fraud | reckless disregard or gross negligence = constructive fraud
26
if fraud, can you have both types of damages?
yes both compensatory and punitive damages
27
is the burden of proof higher for fraud cases?
need to prove with clear and convincing evidence (substantially more probable than more true than not)
28
statute of limitations for fraud
4 years of when they were defrauded or when they discovered the fraud
29
can incidental beneficiaries sue for breach of contract?
no
30
describe the elements of recovery
duty, breach, damages, proximate cause
31
the 3 primary approaches to accountant liability
the privity approach of ultramares vs touche, restatement limited class approach, reasonable foreseeability approach
32
what is the privity approach of ultramares vs touche
accountant is liable only to those with whom they had privity of contract
33
restatement "limited class" approach to accountant liability
accountant has third party liability to a limited class of known or intended users of financial statements whose specific ID don't need to be known by the CPA
34
True or false: a cpa can be held liable for actual fraud only
false
35
true or false: a cpa who commits fraud is liable to all plaintiffs whom the CPA could reasonably foresee would be injured by the fraud
true
36
CPA recklessly disregarded the tax law when giving advice. true or false: this is an example of actual fraud
false
37
do the federal or state courts typically recognize accountant-client testimonial privilege?
no. however, in 15 states some recognize privilege that belongs to the client, which can be waived. only applies in those state courts
38
what section of the IRC extends modest testimonial privilege to clients of tax advisers?
section 7525
39
which section of the IRC provides criminal penalties for unauthorzed disclosures of taxpayer info?
section 7216
40
which section of IRC imposes civil fines for disclosure of taxpayer info?
section 6713
41
what is the custom of profession standard
despite a cpa's adherence to the custom of the profession, negligence may still be present
42
the third party (primary) beneficiary rule is relevant only in which cases: fraud vs constructive fraud vs neglignence
only negligence
43
sources of contract law
common law and article 2 of UCC (uniform commercial code - sales)
44
which requires more details and precision: common law or UCC article 2?
common law. ucc has more flexibility
45
what does ucc article 2 apply to?
contracts that involve sale of goods. can also include providing both goods and services, if primarily for sale of goods. if primarily for installation, that would be common law
46
what does contract law apply to?
service and real estate contracts
47
what are growing crops governed by, UCC or common law?
UCC
48
what is a void contract
lacks legal purpose or is in violation of the law - cannot be enforced by the courts
49
requirements of a valid offer
present intent definite terms communication of offer
50
open price term
a reasonable or market time price at the time of delivery will apply
51
open payment term
payment is due at time and place buyer is to receive the goods
52
open quantity
quantity is to be set by output or need. need good faith and past measurements
53
open place of delivery
delivery is at seller's business or residence
54
open time for contracted performance
reasonable time
55
what are definite terms for common law vs for UCC?
common law requires ID of parties, subject mater, price, time for performance. UCC is more relaxed
56
what is the common law rule for language of acceptance
mirror image rule: acceptance must be absolute, unequivocal, unconditional, or treated as a counteroffer, not an acceptance.
57
what is the UCC rule for language of acceptance
definite expression of acceptance. if followed by additional terms, might form a contract.
58
is conditional acceptance ever acceptance?
no, for both UCC and common law
59
when is acceptance effective?
if sent by an authorized medium, contract is formed when offeree delivers acceptance to authorized medium (even if it is never received by offeror)
60
the 3 types of irrevocable offers
options sales of goods firm offers offers irrevocable by estoppel
61
is a firm offer by a merchant offeror in the sale of goods under the UCC irrevocable even though no consideration is received?
yes
62
true or false: if you accept in writing the written offer "we offer to sell you our boat" this is an enforceable contract under UCC
true
63
When is there no Section 6662 penalty imposed?
If there was reasonable cause for underpayment and taxpayer acted with good faith
64
Reasonable Cause
exercise of ordinary care, judged objectively
65
reasonable cause standards of belief
substantial authority >= 40% | reasonable basis >= 20% sustained
66
does good faith include reliance on tax advisor?
yes. need: advisor was given all facts and circumstance advice was not based on unreasonable assumptions