I hate happiness without the Hs.

Question 1

Durkheim.

Answer 1

The functionalist guy who made organic analogy, the 4 s words, school is society in miniature, the bridge between school & work.

Question 2

Chubb and Moe.

Answer 2

RTS new rights view on education, introduced marketisation

Question 3

Louis Althusser.

Answer 3

educational system as an ideological state apparatus.

Question 4

Bowles and Gintis.

Answer 4

correspondence principle. Maintaining capitalism.

Question 5

Willis.

Answer 5

The guy who interviewed working class boys and found out about their anti school subculture and how they reject schools laws and goals, instead they pursue physical/manual jobs.

Question 6

Stephen Ball.

Answer 6

setting and streaming guy.

Question 7

Thompson.

Answer 7

PM society, schools can break free from the ‘oppressive uniformity’ of the old centralised one size fits all system.

Question 8

Thompson.

Answer 8

PM society, schools can break free from the ‘oppressive uniformity’ of the old centralised one size fits all system.

Question 9

Howard.

Answer 9

Diet and health guy.

Question 10

Jesson and Gray.

Answer 10

Finances for out of school factors thing.

Question 11

Douglas.

Answer 11

parental interest for out of school factors.

Question 12

Sugarman.

Answer 12

Attitudes and values

Question 13

Bernstein.

Answer 13

Language, linguistic skills, elaborated code and that stuff.

Question 14

Bourdieu

Answer 14

Cultural capital.

Question 15

Rosenthal and Jacobson.

Answer 15

Labelling.

Question 16

Ball.

Answer 16

Setting and streaming.

Question 17

Tanner.

Answer 17

the guy who basically just says WC parents can’t afford school supplies and transport.

Question 18

Callender And Jackson.

Answer 18

2000 questionnaires out to prospective students and found WC 5x less likely to apply to University compared to MC.

Question 19

Reay.

Answer 19

Guy or woman, I can’t tell by the name, who supports Callender and Jackson’s study.

Question 20

Fernstein.

Answer 20

parent’s own education.

Question 21

Hubbs et al.

Answer 21

found that where parents use language that challenges their children to evaluate their own understanding or abilities, e.g what do you think, their cognitive performance impoves.

Question 22

Williams and Troyna.

Answer 22

believes educational underachievement is most likely not due to a child’s language, but schools attitude as teachers have a speech hierarchy.

Question 23

Nell Keddie.

Answer 23

describes cultural capital as a myth and sees it as a victim blaming explanation.

Question 24

Howard Becker.

Answer 24

the guy who interviewed 60 teachers from Chicago high schools and found that teachers ‘ideal pupil’ mainly fitted the characteristics of a MC lad.

Question 25

Hempel Jorgensen.

Answer 25

studied two English primary schools and found teachers have different notions of the ideal pupil.
Aspen WC = quiet, passive, obedient.
the other MC school = personality and academic ability.

Question 26

Lacey

Answer 26

the guy or girl, can’t tell by the name, who explains differentiation and polarisation.
D=process of teachers organising pupils according to perceived ability.
P=process of how pupils respond to streaming by moving towards one of two opposite poles or extremes.

Question 27

Gillborn and Youdell.

Answer 27

league table peeps, educational triage guys.

Question 28

Mitsos and Browne.

Answer 28

GCSEs and coursework for girls in school factors.

Question 29

McRobbie.

Answer 29

the impact of feminism in out of school factors for girls.

Question 30

Sharpe.

Answer 30

Changing ambitions for girls out of school factors.

Question 31

Abraham.

Answer 31

Teacher interactions for girls in school factors.

Question 32

O’Conner.

Answer 32

the guy who studied 14-17 year olds and found that marriage and children were not a major part of their life plans.

Question 33

Biggart.

Answer 33

WC girls are more likely to face a precarious position in the labour market and to see motherhood as the only viable option for their futures.

Question 34

Francis.

Answer 34

bois more attention, but gets picked on by teachers.

Question 35

Gaby Weiner. Hah, funny name.

Answer 35

argues that since the 1980s, teachers have challenged gender stereotypes.

Question 36

Kirkby. Kirby with a k and not such a cool lore. Fr tho, Kirby lore is SO UNDERRATED. Like literally, canonically, he’s a god. My god, I’m losing my mind after creating these flashcards, at this point, I’m just bored.

Answer 36

suggested that communicative play through organised social games has been replaced with TV,DVD and computer games. Definitely not as cool as Kirby. Ugh.

Question 37

Sewell.

Answer 37

the guy who says boys fall behind in education because schools have become feminised.

Question 38

Coard.

Answer 38

Ethnocentric curriculum donny.

Question 39

Pilkington.

Answer 39

argues that while cultural explanations may have some merit, they should be approached with caution.

Question 40

Driver and Ballard.

Answer 40

suggested that Asian families have high families for their children and these attitudes have contributed to educational success.

Question 41

Lupton.

Answer 41

argues that adult authority in asian families is similar to the model that operates in schools.

Question 42

Berieter and Engelmann. My god, his parents got so bored while creating his name that they decided to add 2 Ns.

Answer 42

considers that the language spoken by low income black families as inadequate for educational success.

Question 43

Gillborn and Mirza.

Answer 43

points out that the very high attainment of Indian pupils suggest that having English as an 2nd language is not a major barrier. Is it just me, or does saying ‘‘an 2nd’’ sound weird. Feel like ‘‘a 2nd’’ would sound better.

Question 44

Mason.

Answer 44

claims that discrimination is a continuing and persistent feature of the experience of Britain’s citizens of minority ethnic origin.

Question 45

Wood et al. Is it just me, or does every smart guy just have ‘‘et al’’ at the end of their names?

Answer 45

found that only one in 16 ‘ethnic minority’ applications were offered and interview, against one in nine ‘white’ applications.

Question 46

Archer.

Answer 46

believes that teachers ‘‘dominant discourse’’ often leads to ethnic minorities being seen as less than ‘‘ideal pupils.’’

Question 47

Hatcher.

Answer 47

found that schools placed a low priority on dealing with race issues and failed to adequately tackle instances of racist bullying.

Question 48

Smith and Tomlinson.

Answer 48

found schools to be tolerant of all ethnic groups, with a lack of antagonism between students from different ethnic groups.

Question 49

Gillian Evans.

Answer 49

argues that to fully understand the relationship between ethnicity and achievement, we need to look at how ethnicity interacts with hender and class.

Question 50

Paul Connolly.

Answer 50

notes that there is an interactions effect. class and gender interact differently with ethnicity depending on which ethnic group it is.