IA5 The Assessment and Evaluation of Risk Flashcards
(38 cards)
Identify internal information sources used in identifying hazards and assessing risk
- Injury rate
- Ill-health data
- Property damage
- Near-miss information
- Maintenance records
- Absence records
- Fines records
- Enforcement agency’s notices record
Identify external information sources used in identifying hazards and assessing risk
- National governmental enforcement agencies such ad the HSE (UK based) and the OSHA (USA based)
- International bodies such as the ILO, WHO and the ESA (European Safety Agency)
- Professional bodies such as the IOSH
- Trade unions
- Trade associations
- Insurance companies
Identify the benefits and limitations of internal information sources
Benefits:
- Relevant to risk assessments as it will relate to the organisation’s risks and work activities
- Easy to access and easy to ask questions should clarification be required
Limitations:
- Data may be limited in quantity e.g. due to under-reporting
- Data may be limited in quality e.g. due to a poor H&S culture
- Collecting data is time consuming (effect in costs)
Identify the benefits and limitations of external information sources
Benefits:
- More data based on a larger sample
- Type of data covered is much wider than own situation, difficult for an organisation alone to have that quantity of data
- Experience of others are used
Limitations:
- It may be difficult to decide what is relevant to particular situation, some information may not be relevant to the organisation.
- Time consuming, it may be difficult to find the particular information within a lot of data.
- Some of the information may be out of date
- Some international standards may not apply to national legislation
Regarding individual risks and societal concerns, risks may be classified into three categories, they are:
- Unacceptable
- Tolerable
- Acceptable
Define acceptable risk
- Risk regarded as insignificant or trivial and adequately controlled
- No further action required
Define tolerable risk
- People and society are prepared to accept risk in order to secure benefits
- Tolerable does not mean acceptable
- Tolerable risks need effective controls and constant review to reduce them as low as reasonable possible
*
Define hazard
A hazard is any source of potential damage, harm or adverse health effects on something or someone.
Define the methodology for Task Hazard Analysis (THA)
- Select the task to be analysed.
- Break the task down into a sequence of steps
- Identify potential hazards at each step
- Determine control measures to overcome the hazards
- Implement the control measures
- Monitor and review
What is a possible disadvantage of using a checklist to identify hazards?
The risk assessor might focus too much on the hazards on the checklist, and not pay attention to other obvious hazards.
How does a hazard analysis needs to be approach?
On a structured and systematic way in order to identify potential hazards
Give the purpose of a HAZOP study
- The purpose of the HAZOP is to investigate how the system or plant deviates from the design intent and create risk for personnel and equipment and operability problems, or
- The purpose of a HAZOP is to identify deviations from design intent, determine the causes and consequences of deviations and recommend solutions.
- A HAZOP uses systematic examinations to identify and evaluate hazards from processes/operations that present risks to people, plant and/or successful operation.
Identify HAZOP’s terminologies and features
- Adopts the holistic approach (examines the system as a whole) to analyses probability of failure
- Performed by a multidisciplinary team, led by a “trained” team leader
- A scope of work has to be defined, what part of the process is included and excluded in the study
- NODES, part of the processes to be investigated
- GUIDE-WORDS, e.g. no/not/none, more, less, part of, reverse, other than, as well as
- PARAMETERS, e.g flow, pressure, temperature, reaction, level, composition
- Guide-words and parameters are used to evaluate every step of the process
- Identify causes and consequences for the deviations
- Identify control measures and recommend
- HAZOP study to be recorded, documented and communicated.
Give the steps to perform a HAZOP study
- Appointment of a multidisciplinary team
- Appointment of a “trained” team leader
- Decide on the scope of the study (which parts of the process or components are included and excluded)
- Ensure all technical information (data) is available
- Break down the process into smaller parts (called NODES)
- To identify DEVIATIONS, the Team Leader applies (systematically) a set of GUIDE WORDS (No, More, Less, As Well As, Part Of, Reverse,etc ) to each PARAMETER (temperature, pressure, flow,etc.) for each section of the process.
- Once the HAZOP team have determined the possible significant deviations from each intention, they must then identify the possible CAUSES (human, hardware, software) and likely CONSEQUENCES.
- Evaluate current control measures and advise on new or extra measures if necessary
- The HAZOP study is recorded and documented.
Give the advantages of a HAZOP study
- Systematic and comprehensive hazard identification technique
- Examines the causes and consequences of the failure
- Recommends for methods to minimise or mitigate the hazard.
Give the limitations of a HAZOP study.
- Time consuming and expensive.
- Requires detailed design drawing to perform the full study.
- Additional guide words are required for unusual hazards, e.g. radiation for the nuclear industry
- Requires experienced practitioners for identifying deviations and recommending on mitigation.
- Focuses on one-event causes of deviation only. Hazards that are caused by two or more separate deviations cannot be identified by the technique
Identify the 5 steps to follow to perform a risk assessment
- Identify the hazards.
- Decide who might be harmed, and how.
- Evaluate the risks, and decide on precautions.
- Record your significant findings.
- Review your assessment and update if necessary.
Organisations need to reduce risk to a ‘reasonable’ level, what does this mean?
- This means that the cost of a control measure, the time to implement it, the trouble and disruption it will cause, must be weighed against the benefits in risk reduction.
- If a control is very costly and disruptive, but has limited benefits, then it may not be ‘reasonable’ to implement it.
Identify the types of Risk Assessments
- Generic Risk Assessments
- Specific Risk Assessments
- Dynamic Risk Assessments
Give the Limitations of Risk Assessment Processes
- Risk assessment has been completed afterwards as a means of justification
- Using a generic assessment when a site-specific assessment is needed.
- When existing or relevant good practice is not considered as part of the risk assessment process.
- Carrying out a risk assessment using inappropriate good practice.
- Completing the risk assessment without consulting or including those involved in the process/activity
- Ineffective use of consultants, who may give poor advice, or recommend additional controls because it gets them more work rather than because they are needed.
- Failure to identify all hazards associated with an activity.
- Failure to fully consider all the possible consequences of a risk.
- No consideration of what measures would be reasonable in the circumstances (i.e. no consideration of risk versus cost).
- Attempting to use cost benefit analysis to argue that it is reasonable to reduce safety standards to save costs.
- Not doing anything with the results of the assessment. Failure to action the recommendations.
Identify long-term health hazards
- Radiation
- Dusts
- Gases
- Poor ergonomics
- Noise
- Vibration
- Biological hazards
- Asbestos
- Stress
When should a risk assessment be reviewed?
- A certain time has lapsed, and there is a suspicion the risk assessment may be out of date.
- An incident or accident has occurred. This would indicate that either the controls have not been used, or the risk assessment failed to correctly identify the risk and what controls were needed.
- Changes have been made to the layout of the workplace. Or the location of the workplace changes.
- New processes and/or activities have been introduced, or existing ones have been changed.
- New technologies have been introduced.
- A major change has occurred in the workforce. For example, a growing number of apprentices, or an influx of migrant workers speaking a different language.
- A third party requests it. For example, an enforcement agency may require risk assessments to be reviewed. Or an insurance company auditor may recommend this.
- There have been complaints from the workers or the Health and Safety Committee that the risk assessments are no longer valid.
- New information is discovered by the industry, showing some risks which were previously unknown.
- Significant changes are made to working arrangements, such as shift patterns and break times.
Organisations are required to reduce risks to “as low as is reasonably practicable” (ALARP), what does ALARP means?
This is a balancing act with the level of risk on one side and the costs in terms of time, effort, money needed for rectification on the other side.
ALARP allows for grossly disproportionate actions to be deemed unnecessary.
How can a series system reliability be improved?
- Replace the least reliable components with more reliable components. There are usually one or two weak links in the system which lowers the overall reliability.
- Simplify the system so there are fewer components. The fewer components there are, the less can go wrong!
- Change the system so that there are redundancies and back-up system. However, this would no longer be a series system.