Illegal Use of conveyance Flashcards

1
Q

What is a conveyance? And where is the Definition found?

A

Definition is found in the Section at S154A(2)

“Conveyance” means any cart, wagon, cab, carriage, motor car, caravan, trailer, motor lorry, tractor, earth moving equipment, omnibus, motor or other bicycle, tank or other military vehicle, or any ship, or vessel, used or intended for navigation, and drive shall be construed accordingly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When should a charge under Section 154A - Taking a conveyance without consent of an owner - be preferred?

A

When the prosecution can’t satisfy the “permanently deprive” element of stealing, for example when a car is taken for a joy-ride. Provides that a person convicted under this section shall be deemed to be guilty of a larceny and liable to be indicted for that offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the differences between the offences in Sections 154A(1)(a) and 154(1)(b)?

A

Section 154A(1)(a) involves “takes” and “drives” and mostly relates to the driver and Section 154A(1)(b) involves “knowing” “drives” and “carried” and mostly relates to the passenger.

Section 154A(1)(a) states: “Any person who, without consent of the owner/person in lawful possession of a a conveyance, takes and drives it, or takes it for the purpose of driving it, or secreting it, or obtaining a reward for it’s restoration or pretended restoration, or for any other fraudulent purpose shall be deemed to be guilty of larceny.

Section 154A(1)(b) states: “Any person who, knowing that any conveyance has been taken without such consent, drives it or allows himself or herself to be carried in or on it shall e deemed to be guilty of larceny.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two fundamental principles relating to “taking”?

A

The fundamental principles relating to Larceny and the ‘taking of the goods’ are comparable with Section 154A, ie: the taking of the conveyance.

HOWEVER
1. There must be an actual fresh acquisition into possession - ie: didn’t have it yesterday

  1. There must be movement (asportation) however slight.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the jurisdiction of an offence under Section 154A?

A

Although it is deemed to be a larceny, it is strictly a Table 2 offence. Value of vehicle is immaterial/irrespective of value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does the section provide in relation to “drive”?

A

Section 154A(2) provides that the word “drive” is to be construed in relation to the nature (or type) of conveyance alleged to have been driven.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is “drive” defined at Common Law? Cite caselaw.

A

Hampson v Martin - must have control of steering, braking & propulsion.
Savage v Affleck - concept of joint driving in relation to propulsion
Williams v R - at least control of the propulsion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is required in relation to consent?

A

Consent must be full and free. Consent that is obtained by threats of violence, from persons under the influence of alcohol or drugs or of unsound mind may not be considered consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is required in relation to ‘allowed’? (Allows him or herself to be carried)

A

Deals with the willing driver or more commonly the willing passenger.

“Allows” means knowing the car has been taken without consent and enters of his own free will and accord OR knowingly enters a conveyance but subsequently acquires that knowledge then having had the opportunity chooses to remain of his own free will and accord.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the test in relation to ‘knowing’ as per illegal use of conveyance? Cite caselaw.

A

R v Dykyj said that the test to be applied as to required knowledge is subjective.

R v Schipanski - suspicious circumstances coupled with a failure to inquire may sustain an “inference of knowledge” (commonly known as ‘wilful blindness’) - not available as a defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What modes of transport does Section 154C (carjacking) relate to?

A

A motor vehicle or a vessel. Must have an assault and an occupant on board.

154C Taking motor vehicle or vessel with assault or with occupant on board
(1) A person who—
(a) assaults another person with intent to take a motor vehicle or vessel and, without having the consent of the owner or person in lawful possession of it, takes and drives it, or takes it for the purpose of driving it, or
(b) without having the consent of the owner or person in lawful possession of a motor vehicle or vessel, takes and drives it, or takes it for the purpose of driving it, when a person is in or on it,
is liable to imprisonment for 10 years.

(2) A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if the person commits an offence under subsection (1) in circumstances of aggravation. A person convicted of an offence under this subsection is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.

(3) In this section—
circumstances of aggravation means circumstances involving any one or more of the following—
(a) the alleged offender is in the company of another person or persons,
(b) the alleged offender is armed with an offensive weapon or instrument,
(c) the alleged offender intentionally or recklessly inflicts actual bodily harm on any person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the circumstances of aggravation in relation to car-jacking and where are they found?

A

Section 154C(2)

  1. In company
  2. Armed with an offensive weapon or instrument; and
  3. ABH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Where is ‘motor vehicle’ defined?

A

Section 154E(a) - a motor vehicle means—

(a) a motor vehicle within the meaning of the Road Transport Act 2013 (whether or not the vehicle contains the motor intended to form part of it), or
(b) a motor intended to form part of, or capable of forming part of, any such motor vehicle, or
(c) any part of any such motor vehicle containing, or consisting of, an identification plate for a vehicle under the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989 of the Commonwealth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which provision relates to stealing a motor vehicle?

A

Section 154F - A person who steals a motor vehicle or vessel is guilty of an offence - same elements as larceny.

Table 1 offence. (Either defence or prosecution may elect)

Relates to motor vehicle or vessel - not conveyance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which provision relates to car re-birthing?

A

Section 154G - A person facilitates, car or boat re-birthing activity, carried out, on an organised basis, knowing that is a car rebirthing activity AND it is carried out on an organised basis - Strictly Indictable Offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are some relevant summary offences?

A

Road Transport Act Section 147 - Motor Vehicle/trailer not to be used without the consent of the owner

Road Transport Act Section 148 - Procuring or hire of motor vehicle by fraud or misrepresentation.

Summary Offences Act Section 6A - Unauthorised entry of vehicle or boat, enter without lawful excuse, vehicle or boat in a public place, without consent.

17
Q

How is “use” (illegal use of conveyance) defined? Cite caselaw

A

Willis v Sugden held ‘use a motor vehicle is to drive it or do something to it or with it that is ‘incidental to it’s normal use as a motor vehicle’

  • that the section did not apply where the defendant stood outside the vehicle and rocked it.
18
Q

What are the indictable offences for take/drive conveyance and like offences and what section of the Crimes Act are they?

A

Section 154A - 154J

Section 154:
A. Taking conveyance without consent of the owner

C. Car Jacking

F. Stealing a motor vehicle or vessel
G. Facilitating organised car or boat re-birthing activities
H. Making, using or interfering with unique identifiers
I. Possession of motor vehicle or vessel where unique identifier has been interfered with
J. Possession of vehicle identification plate not attached to motor vehicle (without reasonable excuse - onus on the Defence).

19
Q

Why not just charge with “Steal Motor Vehicle”?

A

Because for stealing, one of the proofs is “intent to permanently deprive”. This offence covers things such as joyriding - those who take a car to joyride in and have no intention to permanently deprive and therefore the prosecution cannot prove that element.

20
Q

Section 154A (1) has two arms (1)(a) and (1)(b). What is the difference?

A

(1)(a) covers the driver and (1)(b) covers the passenger.

Section 154(1)(a)

Section 154 (1)(b)

21
Q

What is a conveyance? Where is the Definition found?

A

The definition is found at Section 154(2):

(2) For the purposes of this section conveyance means any cart, wagon, cab, carriage, motor car, caravan, trailer, motor lorry, tractor, earth moving equipment, omnibus, motor or other bicycle, tank or other military vehicle, or any ship, or vessel, used or intended for navigation, and drive shall be construed accordingly.

22
Q

What are the proofs of take/drive conveyance?

A

1(b) The Accused
Takes and Drives OR
Takes it for the purpose of driving it/secreting it/obtaining a reward for (pretended restoration)/any other purpose

OR

(1)(b) Knowing
Any conveyance
Has been taken
Without consent
DRIVES IT OR
ALLOWS him/herself (enters knowingly, opportunity to leave) 
To be carried in/on it.
23
Q

How is “take” defined at Common Law. Cite authorities.

A

Hollingsworth v Bean [1970]

R v Bogacki and Ors [1973]

2 questions: is there a taking? Is there a drive?

24
Q

What is drive? Bottom slide page 4

A

The person what has control over the propulsion of a conveyance is the driver.

Remembering there is NO definition for Driver in the Crimes Act and we must rely on Common Law.

Hampson v Martin “the steersman” must have control of steering, breaking and propulsion

Savage v Affleck - determining is propulsion - don’t require all 3. (Concept of joint driving).

Williams v R - “at least the propulsion” (the ability to steer a vehicle is not an essential aspect of a person being a “driver”

25
Q

What is drive as per Savage v Affleck?

A

Savage v Affleck is the concept of joint driving. - determining factor is propulsion - don’t require all 3.

26
Q

What is drive as per Williams v R?

A

This is the case where there was an intoxicated driver (0.282). Front seat passenger grabs steering wheel seconds before the vehicle collided with a power-pole, killing the passenger. Charged dangerous driving occasioning death.

The ability to steer is a vehicle is not an essential aspect of a person being a driver.

The applicant maintained management and control of the car, AT LEAST THE PROPULSION (accelerating and braking), up to the very point of impact.

A person may still be able to be a driver even if they are not in control of the steering.