Illegality Flashcards

1
Q

What are the categories of illegality?

A
Misinterpretation of law
Abuse of discretion
Retention of discretion
Error of fact
Simple illegality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the categories of illegality?

A
Misinterpretation of law
Abuse of discretion
Retention of discretion
Error of fact
Simple illegality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lord Diplock’s definition of illegality

A

A decision maker must understand the law and use it properly, otherwise this is grounds for JR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ultra vires

A

Where the public authority acts outside its authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

AG v Fulham Corp

A

Fulham Corp had power to provide washing service for free, but provided laundry service at a cost. Ultra vires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Westminster Corp v London & NW Railway

A

Had power to build toilets for station, also built subway. Not ultra vires as was incidental to exercise of conferred power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Principle of illegality

A

A fundamental right cannot be infringed unless it is expressly worded as such. If statute is interpreted to infringe a fundamental right then it is illegal and the basis for JR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v SSHD ex p Leech

A

Prison had power to intercept letters, but interpreted power to read letters between prisoner and solicitor. This is fundamental right, and as infringement not expressly worded as such this was illegal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

HM Treasury v Ahmed

A

Interpretation of United Nations Act 1946 to allow freezing of prisoners assets (fundamental right). Not expressly worded as such so this was illegal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Errors of fact - Precedent fact

A

Where a fact is the basis of an action then an error of that fact will be a precedent fact and will mean that the decision is illegal and grounds for JR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ex p Khawja

A

Illegal immigrant detained on basis that he was an illegal immigrant. He wasn’t therefore error of precedent fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Unsubstantiated fact

A

No evidence rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Colleen Properties v Minister of Health

A

No evidence for decision. Illegal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mistake of established fact

A

Where a fact is wrongly held or contentiously held and this is used as the basis of an action then this will be grounds for JR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Tameside

A

Decision to force a school to go comprehensive was made on the basis that Grammar schools are bad for kids. Mistake of fact, therefore illegality and JR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

E v Home Secretary

A

A mistake of established fact or the use of a contentious fact for the basis of a decision is grounds for illegality if;

  1. Claimant is not responsible for the fact
  2. The error effected the outcome of the trial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Misinterpretation of the law

A

Where law is interpreted wrongly this is grounds for JR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Anisminic v FCC

A

Where law is interpreted wrongly this is grounds for JR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Ex p Page - Misinterpretation of law is not grounds for JR in 4 situtaions

A
  1. Mistake immaterial to outcome
  2. Special system of rules
  3. Decision of court of first instance is binding
  4. Where multiple interpretations of the law are possible as law is so wide Ex P South Yorkshire Transport
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

R v CICB ex p A

A

Policewoman’s testimony that wounds inconsistent with rape was used at trial, this was a mistake of established fact as medical team reached opposite conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Abuse of discretion - Relevant and irrelevant considerations

A

Courts must consider mandatory factors and ignore prohibitory factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Ex P Fewings

A
  1. Mandatory factors must be considered
  2. Prohibitory factors cannot be considered
  3. Discretionary factors are up to discretion
    Decision taken on the basis of morality was a prohibitory factor was was grounds for illegality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

R v SSHD ex p Venables

A

Decision taken in consideration of public outcry, this was a prohibitory factor therefore grounds for illegalityq

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Roberts v Hopwood

A

Did not look at mandatory factor, therefore illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Are resources a relevant factor?
Yes - Ex p Barry No - Ex p P Sometimes - Ex p Tandy
26
Abuse of discretion - Improper purpose
Where discretion is used for a purpose it is not conferred for
27
Padfield v Minister of Agriculture
Minister had power to direct investigations however denied investigation as it owuld have embarrassed him. Grounds for judicial review on illegality, abuse of discretion, improper purpose
28
Congreve v Home Office
Declaration that TV licences were void was illegal as an improper purpose. not designed to generate revenue but regulate TV usage
29
Retention of discretion
Where a decision maker is granted discretion then this discretion must be exercised, and the DM cannot fetter themselves by not exercising it
30
R v SSHD ex p Fire Brigades Union
SSHD did no implement a compensation scheme which he had the discretion to do. This was a retention of discretion as instead he implemented his own tariff scheme. He fettered himself through not implementing the scheme. Therefore this was grounds for JR through illegality on the basis of retention of discretion by fettering of discretion
31
Ex P Brent
A rigid policy where discretion is not exercised which is granted is groudns for JR
32
British Oxygen v BOT
A firm policy which exercises discretion is allowed, providing that the issue has been considered and applied
33
Ex P Collymore
JR if discretion only notionally applied
34
Retention of discretion - Unlawful delegation
Cannot delegate discretionq
35
Lavender
General rule; cannot delegate discretion
36
Carltona Principle
Exception; you can delegate discretion within the department
37
Ex P Doody
Exception to the exception; Cannot delegate below a junior minister in the department
38
Lord Diplock's definition of illegality
A decision maker must understand the law and use it properly, otherwise this is grounds for JR
39
Ultra vires
Where the public authority acts outside its authority
40
AG v Fulham Corp
Fulham Corp had power to provide washing service for free, but provided laundry service at a cost. Ultra vires
41
Westminster Corp v London & NW Railway
Had power to build toilets for station, also built subway. Not ultra vires as was incidental to exercise of conferred power
42
Principle of illegality
A fundamental right cannot be infringed unless it is expressly worded as such. If statute is interpreted to infringe a fundamental right then it is illegal and the basis for JR
43
R v SSHD ex p Leech
Prison had power to intercept letters, but interpreted power to read letters between prisoner and solicitor. This is fundamental right, and as infringement not expressly worded as such this was illegal
44
HM Treasury v Ahmed
Interpretation of United Nations Act 1946 to allow freezing of prisoners assets (fundamental right). Not expressly worded as such so this was illegal
45
Errors of fact - Precedent fact
Where a fact is the basis of an action then an error of that fact will be a precedent fact and will mean that the decision is illegal and grounds for JR
46
Ex p Khawja
Illegal immigrant detained on basis that he was an illegal immigrant. He wasn't therefore error of precedent fact
47
Unsubstantiated fact
No evidence rule
48
Colleen Properties v Minister of Health
No evidence for decision. Illegal.
49
Mistake of established fact
Where a fact is wrongly held or contentiously held and this is used as the basis of an action then this will be grounds for JR
50
Tameside
Decision to force a school to go comprehensive was made on the basis that Grammar schools are bad for kids. Mistake of fact, therefore illegality and JR
51
E v Home Secretary
A mistake of established fact or the use of a contentious fact for the basis of a decision is grounds for illegality if; 1. Claimant is not responsible for the fact 2. The error effected the outcome of the trial
52
Misinterpretation of the law
Where law is interpreted wrongly this is grounds for JR
53
Anisminic v FCC
Where law is interpreted wrongly this is grounds for JR
54
Ex p Page - Misinterpretation of law is not grounds for JR in 4 situtaions
1. Mistake immaterial to outcome 2. Special system of rules 3. Decision of court of first instance is binding 4. Where multiple interpretations of the law are possible as law is so wide Ex P South Yorkshire Transport
55
R v CICB ex p A
Policewoman's testimony that wounds inconsistent with rape was used at trial, this was a mistake of established fact as medical team reached opposite conclusion
56
Abuse of discretion - Relevant and irrelevant considerations
Courts must consider mandatory factors and ignore prohibitory factors
57
Ex P Fewings
1. Mandatory factors must be considered 2. Prohibitory factors cannot be considered 3. Discretionary factors are up to discretion Decision taken on the basis of morality was a prohibitory factor was was grounds for illegality
58
R v SSHD ex p Venables
Decision taken in consideration of public outcry, this was a prohibitory factor therefore grounds for illegalityq
59
Roberts v Hopwood
Did not look at mandatory factor, therefore illegality
60
Are resources a relevant factor?
Yes - Ex p Barry No - Ex p P Sometimes - Ex p Tandy
61
Abuse of discretion - Improper purpose
Where discretion is used for a purpose it is not conferred for
62
Padfield v Minister of Agriculture
Minister had power to direct investigations however denied investigation as it owuld have embarrassed him. Grounds for judicial review on illegality, abuse of discretion, improper purpose
63
Congreve v Home Office
Declaration that TV licences were void was illegal as an improper purpose. not designed to generate revenue but regulate TV usage
64
Retention of discretion
Where a decision maker is granted discretion then this discretion must be exercised, and the DM cannot fetter themselves by not exercising it
65
R v SSHD ex p Fire Brigades Union
SSHD did no implement a compensation scheme which he had the discretion to do. This was a retention of discretion as instead he implemented his own tariff scheme. He fettered himself through not implementing the scheme. Therefore this was grounds for JR through illegality on the basis of retention of discretion by fettering of discretion
66
Ex P Brent
A rigid policy where discretion is not exercised which is granted is groudns for JR
67
British Oxygen v BOT
A firm policy which exercises discretion is allowed, providing that the issue has been considered and applied
68
Ex P Collymore
JR if discretion only notionally applied
69
Retention of discretion - Unlawful delegation
Cannot delegate discretionq
70
Lavender
General rule; cannot delegate discretion
71
Carltona Principle
Exception; you can delegate discretion within the department
72
Ex P Doody
Exception to the exception; Cannot delegate below a junior minister in the department