Impact of a monopsony in a supermarket industry Flashcards
(5 cards)
Knowledge Marks of a Monopsony
oSingle dominant buyer
oBargaining power
oIdentification of monopsony abuse (forcing suppliers to sell at lower prices to minimise cost and maximise profits
oExplain why suppliers are forced to have low prices
KAA1 - Cost to the supplier
o Lower price (Monopoly Bargaining Power)- Less producer surplus
o Less revenue
o Sometimes high cost as well due to extra cost- Packaging may be put upon them by monopsony firm
o Less supernormal profits
o Less finance for reinvestment
*Decrease in product development (Give examples)
*Decrease in dynamic efficiency (examples)
o Cutting on cost
*Delaying their deliveries
*Cutting down on quality
*Lay off workers
o Reaching shutdown point (AR=AVC)- Leaving industry
*Cost to workers (Optional, according to question)
*Wage cuts
*Job losses
Eval 1 - Govt intervention to reduce monopsony power
oGovernment intervention to reduce monopsony power
§Reduce barriers to entry- Increase competition and contestability
§Laws and regulations- Fines
§Protecting suppliers and employees
*Minimum price for suppliers
*Minimum wage for workers (Optional,
according to question)
o Suppliers may come together (trade union)- Bilateral monopolyoffset monopsony effect
oBenefit to the supplier- Suppliers have a major buyer
improving revenue (Optional)
§Long term investment decisions
§Profit
KAA2 - Cost to consumers
- Cost to consumers
o Variety decreases, due to low contestability - Some suppliers may leave
industry
o Quality decreases - Poor quality as suppliers
have low profits they will cut
down on quality
o Monopsony power may
result in monopoly power-increase prices for
consumers
Eval2 - Benefit to consumers
Evaluation 2–
o Lower cost can be passed on
consumers- Lower prices -
Increase consumer surplus