IMPACT OF NAPOLEON ON EUROPE 1799-1815 Flashcards
(59 cards)
motivations for napoleon for expanding his empire / creating an empire
- universal empire / greed - personal ambition with charlemange
- encourage french nationalism - ‘common fatherland’
- enlightenment
- material gain
which social groups in empire supported and did not support napoleon
supported:
- nobility / elite
- educated bourgeoisie
- merchants and manufacturers
- conservative individuals
not support:
- peasantry
treaty of pressburg
- 26th december 1805
- imposes harsh terms on austria after their defeat at austerlitz
- austria is forced to accept french dominance in northern italy etc
change over time of social policies
- by 1808, implementing social reform became less important than foriegn conflict
- the loyalty of soldiers was more important than reform
impact of napoleonic rule on agriculture
- no difference to small scale subsistence farmers
- created an inequality gap between the north and south within italy
- but the napoleonic economy was reliant on agriculture due to a lack of industry
napoleon economic policies in empire / examples of financial pressure on empire
- FRANCE FIRST - expectation that other states would provide / input into the french budget
- napoleon dismantled guilds + internal trade barriers to maximise revenue
- taxation rates were high to boost revenue for france (increase in kingdom if italy by 50% from 05-11’)
- ie napoleon scolded joseph (king of naples) in 1806 for not prioritising french interests - economic pressure put on satellite states
- ie 1806 jena defeat = 311 million
- satellite states = 1/3 of army
- from 1806, 6 million inhabitants paid a collective 1.5 to france/year - continental blockade
- destroy italian silk
- all silk went to lyons, not lombardy - donations
- would provide to the wealthy elite
ie:
- naples - had 100 different taxes and it was replaced by 1) a land tax and 2) an industry tax
difference between the state of economies in different types of states
- pay conquis = preferential treatment
- pay reunis - not allowed to develop industries which competed with french products, they would only supply the raw materials
resistance in empire to napoleonic rule
- uprising in tryol in 1808 to conscription
- uprisings in holland from 1811-1812 due to anti-conscription
- jacobin uprising in bologna in 1802 for disbanding of the national guard - led by stilettani
impact of conscription on grand empire (did it improve and not improve empire)
improve:
- conscription was gradual in naples to ease people into the idea
- very loyal population - only 10% desertion rates
- napoleon had access to a stable, reliable military
not improve:
- conscription would always lead to revolt (ie financial implications for no army - ITALY) - pop declines - bitter
- in westphalia, only 30,000 people volunteered from a 2 million population - knew the burdens
- troops were given national conscience and would unite against nap
general impact of napoleon’s policies on pay reunis and pay conquis
- napoleon militarily developed these areas to create a buffer zone from european invasion
- pay reunis were regarded as an extension of old regime france
- he attempted to socially develop (ie abolish feudalism), but failed (ie piedmont)
- consolidated the powers of a ruling class and meritocratic society
- generally, minimal impact
when does napoleon crown himself king of italy
26th may 1805
- no papal support
napoleon not having political influence over empire
- naples = napoleon’s political reform was pushed back on (ie napoleonic code not introduced until 1810)
napoleon not having economic influence over empire
- labour contracts remained present in poland in 1807 despite the abolition of serfdom
- british export value 38-48 million
- tsar imposes tariffs on france december 1810
population and department number in france by 1810
44 million population
130 departments
impact of new legal practices on empire (did it improve and not improve empire)
- law was reformed for the most part, but difficult to change quickly
- revolutionary changes were heavily opposed
improve:
- all citizens were equal before the law
- napoleon introduced the civil code and napoleonic code
not improve:
- the civil code and divorce legislation was never fully applied in rome
- count beugnot protested these - precedent to oppose napoleonic ruke
how was napoleon motivated by a desire to promote nationalism to expand empire
- post-1806, he became much more ruthless in his nature / despotic
- he encouraged nationalist sentiment during his consolidation, quashed it once he had consolidated properly
- he wanted to further french sentiment (ie told la cases in 1815 that there were 30 million frenchmen in europe + empire must expand to further national education / agglomerate)
impact of local administration on empire (did it improve and not improve empire)
improve:
- more individuals in positions of expertise (ie roderer in switzerland, holland and naples + 100 taxes into 1)
- highly centralised administration - loyalty etc - minister of interior
- local prefects, gendaramie (supervised local law and order)
- cautious of healthcare - ie vaccinations against smallpox
not improve:
- administration was too centralised and allow a build up of local power (ie roderer - individuals have too much power)
2 conservatives in europe who benefit from napoleonic rule
- schimmelpennick - landowner and leader in holland who thought napoleonic rule would preserve dutch independence, obv it doesn’t
- melzi - supported napoleon to crush radical italians and provide administrative benefits
negative impacts of continental blockade
- limited trading opportunity
- non french manufacturing suffers
- piedmont was prohibited from trading w anyone but lyons
- 1806 + 1810 - napoleon abolished traditional trading links to prioritise trade w france
- italy only traded w france at fear of being annexed
- satellite states could only have manufacturing in areas which complement not compete w french industry
- shipbuilding industry declines due to limited overseas trade - creates gap in standard of life
- agriculture prices drop + standard of living drops - no demand for goods due to no competing w france
- northern italy was extremely prosperous, southern italy was extremely poor
- insufficient markets in britain
napoleon’s social influence over empire + examples
- legalisation of divorce under napoleonic codes and fully implemented by 1810
- removal of rights and privileges of clergy
- abolish feudalism
- concordat of 1801 widely implemented (secularisation + remove church dominance over education etc)
- religious property goes on sale
- napoleon had power to appoint people in empire to be loyal - would marry his family into other monarchies
- imperial nobility + hierarchy
how was napoleon motivated by charlemange and a universal empire to expand his empire / actions which demonstrate this
- he was obsessed by the empire built by charlemange
- by 1810, the empire exceeded the area of charlemange
- in 1806 + 1808 he was corresponding with C
- he had a ‘rivalry’ with C and felt this need to ‘outdo’ C
actions:
- napoleon crowns himself king of italy and stops donations into italy
how was napoleon motivated by material gain when expanding / creating an empire
- over time, he saw war as a good thing because it fuelled his ambitions
- war would provide material goods and loyalty from local elites who would give him a monopoly over local goods
- money from battles would prop up france
ie:
- jena 1806 = prussia pays 311 million francs
- reunite the economy of the kingdom of italy - pay france 1.5 million annually
what counts under social policy
- education and infrastructure
- feudalism
- law / order
- religion
rising at tryol
- uprising in 1808 against the introduction of conscription
- french control over conscription and to control the population declines and becomes weaker over time