Impeachment Flashcards

(52 cards)

1
Q

What is impeachment?

A

Attacking the credibility of witness testimony, either concerning the subject of the testimony or the general believability of the witness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is rehabilitation?

A

Repairing the credibility of a witness whose testimony has been impeached/

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is intrinsic evidence?

A

admissions on cross-examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is extrinsic evidence?

A

Any evidence other than admissions on cross-examination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the five common methods of impeachment in federal court?

A
  1. Bias, sympathy, or ulterior motive
  2. Defects in perception or memory
  3. Bad character for truthfulness
  4. Prior inconsistent statements
  5. Contradicting the testimony with counterproof
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three ways to show bad character for truthfulness?

A
  1. Prior unconvicted acts indicating dishonesty
  2. Prior convictions
  3. Reputation/opinion evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who may impeach a witness?

A

Any party, even the party that called the witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can a party impeach their own witness?

A

Some courts require
1. Some degree of surprise and
2. the testimony caused some damage

Some courts do not require the above when the proponent calls a witness known to be hostile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some facts that show bias against a party?

A
  1. prior disputes
  2. statements indicating racial animus
  3. economic competition
  4. plea agreement requiring witness to cooperate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are some facts showing bias in favor of a party?

A
  1. longstanding friendship
  2. romantic relationship
  3. shared economic interest
  4. membership in the same group/religious organization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Are there any other instances where bias might be present that don’t involve bias toward a person or party?

A

Yes. E.g., a pending book deal or a pending trial of a witness where this testimony could be used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When is bias irrelevant?

A

Trick question! It is always relevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 3 ways bias can be proven?

A
  1. Cross-examination of a witness (intrinsic)
  2. Extrinsic evidence of conduct
  3. Extrinsic evidence of prior statement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an alternative technique to get extrinsic evidence of bad character for truthfulness admitted?

A

BIAS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the holding in the Abel case?

A
  1. Bias is always relevant
  2. All it takes to get you evidence in is one avaialable route (i.e., the unavailability of one route does not affect the availability of another
  3. Bias can be proven with extrinsic evidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When are defects in perception or memory irrelevant?

A

Defects in perception or memory are always relevant AS LONG as the validity of the witness’s testimony depends on perception or memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

T/F only extrinsic evidence of defect in perception or memory can be used

A

False. Intrinsic or extrinsic (e.g., doctor’s testimony or records) evidence can be used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the 3 ways to show bad character for truthfulness?

A
  1. Unconvicted acts bearing on truthfulness
  2. Prior Convictions
  3. Reputation or opinion evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the 2 ways to present evidence for unconvicted acts bearing on truthfulness

A
  1. You can ask the witness about their unconvicted acts.
  2. You can confront the witness with the bad or good acts of other people whose character they discussed. (NOTE: This is technically extrinsic to the examination of target witness, BUT it is intrinsic in the sense that a 3rd party witness opened the door to this line of questioning. Remember, opening the door trumps everything because the witness is putting it at issue by taking the stand themselves.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Do you have to respect a witness’s 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination when trying to elicit testimony regarding unconvicted acts bearing on truthfulness?

A

Yessir.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What type of evidence cannot be offered for unconvicted acts bearing on truthfulness?

A

EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE

22
Q

What are the three steps for getting evidence of prior convictions admitted?

A
  1. Determine whether the conviction qualifies
  2. Determine which balancing test to use
  3. Consider time limits
23
Q

When does a prior conviction qualify as evidence for impeachment?

A
  1. if it was a felony punishable by death or imprisonment exceeding one year OR
  2. If the offense involved dishonesty as an element the government must prove.

(i.e., felonies are categorically admitted. Whether a misdemeanor is admitted depends on whether it involves dishonesty. THEFT does not involve dishonesty.)

24
Q

Do nolo pleas and convictions awaiting appeal count as qualifying convictions

25
What balancing test is used to admit a prior conviction that involved dishonesty?
Trick question! No balancing test is used.
26
What balancing test is used when a proponent wishes to offer evidence of a prior conviction against the defendant?
A tough balancing test: the Probative value must outweigh prejudicial effect
27
What balancing test is used when a proponent wishes to offer evidence of a prior conviction for a witness other than the accused?
Harmful effect must not substantially outweigh relevance
28
When can pardoned convictions get admitted?
If the pardon is not based on a finding of innocence, or if the person is pardoned for rehabilitation and commits no more crimes.
29
When are pardons for prior convictions excluded?
- If pardon is based on a finding of innocence, evidence CAN’T get in - If someone is pardoned for rehabilitation and commits no more crimes, evidence CAN’T get in (Note: BUT if they commit more crimes, this reactivates the pardoned crime, and evidence of both CAN get in)
30
When can evidence of a prior conviction for a juvenile adjudication get in?
Typically, it is not admitted unless it is a qualifying conviction, passes the applicable balancing test, is within the appropriate time frame, you can prove it is NECESSARY for the trial, AND the witness IS NOT THE DEFENDANT.
31
What is the time limit for allowing evidence of prior convictions?
If 10 years have passed since conviction date or release from confinement (whichever is later), evidence can't come in UNLESS there's notice to adverse party AND it passed the reverse 403 balancing test
32
What is reputation or opinion evidence
A 3rd party can attack or support a witness's credibility with testimony about their character for (un)truthfulness
33
When can reputation or opinion evidence supporting a witness's credibility come in?
AFTER someone has attacked their credibility
34
What is a limitation of reputation or opinion evidence offered by a 3rd party?
The 3rd party cannot offer specific acts of the witness in the first volley, just general support
35
When can reputation or opinion evidence of a specific act get in?
on cross or redirect (you can't get it in on the first volley)
36
What kind of evidence does reputation or opinion evidence usually require?
extrinsic evidence (unless the witness admits they have a bad reputation)
37
What is the basic idea behind evidence of prior inconsistent statements?
Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
38
What can in-court prior inconsistent statements be used for?
in-court prior inconsistent statements can be used for impeachment and for substantive matters (i.e., as evidence pertaining directly to the verdict)
39
What are the 4 setting that qualify as "in-court" statements with respect to prior inconsistent statements?
1. prior trials 2. hearings 3. grand jury proceedings 4. depositions Why? because all require an oath
40
Are affidavits considered in-court statements (re prior inconsistent statements)
Minority: yes Majority: considered out-of-court statements
41
What can out-of-court prior inconsistent statements be used for
ONLY impeachment. Contrast with in-court statements, which can be used for impeachment and substantive matters.
42
What are collateral matters?
immaterial details that don't matter for the trial
43
When can you impeach with prior inconsistent statements on collateral matters?
You can't! You can only impeach with prior inconsistent statements on non-collateral matters
44
What must the opposing counsel get when a proponent intends to introduce a prior inconsistent statement as evidence? When must they get it?
Opposing counsel must be given a written copy of the statement to be used for impeachment Before trial!
45
What must a witness get when a proponent introduces one of their prior inconsistent statements?
The witness must get an opportunity to explain the inconsistency
46
What does the majority rule require for impeaching your own witness?
Surprise + Damage
47
What is the minority rule for impeaching your own witness?
Uncertainty of what witness will say + Damage (Webster)
48
What prior statements cannot be used as evidence of prior inconsistent statements?
involuntary statements statements in plea negotiations post-miranda silence
49
Can you impeach someone with unconstitutionally obtained evidence?
Yes! If on cross and If a statement: as long as the witness takes the stand (Harris) If physical evidence: as long as the evidence was generally mentioned in direct. (Havens)
50
What is the main idea behind the impeachment technique of contradicting the witness?
You can always call other witnesses to tell a different story about a non-collateral issue. Contradicting=telling a different story through your own witness. impeachment through contradicting proof.
51
What is the dual relevancy requirement regarding the impeachment technique of contradicting the witness?
Many courts require the contradiction must be relevant in its own right, not just to contradict the other side.
52
For what impeachment technique is extrinsic evidence not allowed
Showing prior unconvicted acts bearing on truthfulness.