Implant technology - unit 1 deck 3 Flashcards
(38 cards)
Recall that the amount of load transfer from bone to implant or vice versa in a load transfer region depends on the relative loads taken by them in the load sharing region; and this in turn depends on their relative rigidities.
In a load sharing region state the relationship used to calculate the load taken by the bone and that of the implant
In the load sharing region when an implant is inplace state the equation used to calculate the total load taken by the bone
Let us consider load transfer under a bending load.
Using as an example the cross section of the bone in Figure 6 and assuming a perfectly fitting circular stem (i.e. with a diameter of 18 mm), the relative rigidities can be calculated using the formula above for I for circular shafts:
Re-arrange end bit to equal LBONE = 0.4 LTOTAL
What is meant by rigidity?
Rigidity is the stiffness of the cross section of a material. It is similar to structural stiffness but ignores the length of the structure. It is a particularly useful quantity for calculating the loads taken by a bone and an implant in a load sharing region
What are the two factors affecting the rigidity of a structure?
Material stiffness and a geometrical property of the cross section. Axial rigidity = EA; Bending rigidity = EI and Torsional rigidity = GJ.
What is the ratio of the bending rigidity of an 11 mm diameter and a 10 mm diameter intramedullary nail given the following information:
both are made from stainless steel both have a wall thickness of 1 mm.
Note that if you refer to page 16 and the pic of the hollow circles they have a thickness of 1mm walls but that equates to a 2mm difference in outer and inner diameter
Referring to Figure 2B, will a stiff stem give more or less stress shielding of bone in Region 1, than a less stiff stem? Explain why.
The stiffer stem gives a greater degree of stress shielding in Region 1. This can be explained as follows.
In the load sharing region, Region 2, the stiffer implant takes more load than the less stiff one because it is more rigid relative to bone. This means that less load will be transferred from the stem to the bone in Region 1 for the stiff implant, i.e. the bone in Region 1 takes less load and is therefore more stress shielded.
Most orthopaedic implants are designed to be fixed to bone, what is the contact area between the fixator and the bone is known as ?
The bone-implant interface
What are the requirements for the bone-implant interface and what is the potential consequence if this is not ensured?
The interface must remain fixed and free from movement, otherwise the implant will loosen and probably fail.
. Fixation of an implant can be achieved using different methods, what is the main factor determining the method used?
By whether or not the implant is intended to be removed at a later date
How are fracture fixators usually held in place and do they end up getting removed or not?
They are mostly intended for temporary implantation and are held in by screws, which can be undone and the fixator removed after the bone has healed
How long are joint replacements intended on being inplace and therefore what should be avoided?
They are intended to be implanted permanently so loosening, which is the main cause of failure, must be avoided
Screws have a wide variety of uses in the fixation of orthopaedic devices, especially fracture fixators, what is the advantages of using screws over nuts and bolts?
- Screw attachment requires access from one side of a bone only, whereas a nut and bolt combination must be accessed from both sides of the hole - one for the bolt, the other for the nut ==> Using a bolt, therefore, involves more trauma to tissues
- The heads of nuts and bolts tend to project more than the head of a screw. This can create practical problems if there is only a small distance from the bone to the skin‟s surface, such as in the case of the interior part of the tibia. Nuts and bolts are used very rarely for attaching implants to bone.
What does the success of using interference fit implant fixation rely on ?
This fixation technique requires no specific fixation device but relies instead on a tight contact between implant and bone, surface friction between the two materials preventing movement at the interface. The surface shapes must match well if this method of fixation is to work well, otherwise there is a considerable risk of loosening or of the stem sinking into the bone
How is the tight contact between implant and bone achieved when using interference fit implant fixation ?
The dimensions of the inner component are slightly larger than those of the outer component, and the implant is pressed into the bone to lessen the risk of loosening. Using a tapered stem allows it to push outwards on the bone, preventing excessive subsidence if the interference fit is not adequate
What happens if the interference fit is made too tight in implant fixation ?
The bone will split, so it is necessary to find a compromise that gives a good fit without causing bone damage.
What type of implants is interference fit used for ?
Cementless joint replacements
In practice is it possible to provide total surface contact between the implant and bone using interference fit technique and is this necessary?
- No - its not yet possible to make a prosthesis to fit exactly an intramedullary bone canal or to cut out the bone to exact dimensions to provide a predetermined level of interference
- However, total contact is not necessary, as long as there is sufficient contact to provide the required friction to prevent motion..
How does bone cement work?
It acts as a filling material, or grout; it is not an adhesive, as the word cement would suggest. It is intended to fill gaps between a bone and an implant, so a perfect bone-implant geometrical match is not required. Once the cement has cured (dried), the bone-implant interface should remain free from motion if the cement has properly filled the gaps between the materials
What is bone cement used for ?
It is the most common implant fixation technique used in the stems of joint replacements
There are no suitable adhesives for attaching materials to bone - T or F?
True
What are biological fixation techniques used in implant fixation?
This technique has been tried for hip joint replacements
The technique involves a porous coating, mesh or roughened area on the surface of an implant, the assumption is then that bone will grow into the porous coating, forming an interlock between the two materials
Describe the 2 main porous coatings used in biological implant fixation and the main drawbacks with both techniques
- Porous bead coating using beads of the same metal as the implant. Pores between the spherical beads allow the bone to grow into the coating. This technique exposes a large surface area of metal making it very vulenrable to corrosion esp service corrosion ==> titanium is used in this technique as it is the least corrosive and most biocompatible of the orthopaedic implant metals.
- A ceramic, such as hydroxyapatite (HAp) HAp which is deposited directly on to the metal surface using a technique called plasma spray coating. It has not been possible to achieve good long term bonding between the bone and the coating using this technique. After a year or two, sometimes longer, it is noticeable that some of the coating disappears, however short-term the bonding is good. HAp can alternatively be applied to a porous metal coating, such as the titanium beads mentioned above and may produce better long term results.
What are the main advantages of using screws instead of nuts and bolts in the fixation of implants to bone?
Screws require access on one side of the bone only and tend to project less than nuts and bolts