Important Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Apprendi

A

Jury must make findings to increase sentence over statutory max OTHER than prior convictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Blakely v Washington

A

6th amendment right to jury trial violated if judge increases sentence outside of guideline range without jury finding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Brady

A

Exonerating, exculpatory or impeaching evidence held by the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Giglio

A

State must disclose anything material affecting credibility of a witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Spencer v Florida

A

Death penalty hearing for defense to present evidence after jury finds death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strickland v Washington

A

IAC two things:
-counsel’s performance fell below an OBJECTIVE standard of reasonableness
-Reasonable probability it would have changed outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Faretta v California

A

Constitutional right to represent yourself but must be knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Alford pleas

A

Best interest plea not an admission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nebbia hearing

A

Legit source of bond—not in FL but in federal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Alcorn violation

A

When attorney doesn’t convey plea offer, prejudice prong is different for Strickland analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Allen charge

A

Encourage deadlocked jury to reach a verdict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nelson hearing

A

Should court appointed counsel be removed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Melbourne objection

A

Race challenge—reaffirmed Neil basically—burden on party using the strike to give race neutral reason and not pretextual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Batson challenge

A

Race neutral reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ring v Arizona

A

Jury must decide aggravating factors for death penalty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Franks challenge

A

Challenging a search warrant based on false info—burden is on defendant!

17
Q

Arthur hearing standard

A

Proof evident, presumption great

18
Q

Huff hearing

A

Determines if evidentiary hearing appropriate in post conviction

19
Q

Atkins hearing

A

Determines if D is mentally retarded and ineligible for death penalty

20
Q

Bruton Violation

A

Can’t use co-defs confession implicating def

21
Q

Garcia hearing

A

Waiving conflict in being rep’d by same lawyer

22
Q

Quarterman agreement

A

Sentence up to max if no show for sentencing

23
Q

Jackson v state (test for due process violation and pre indictment delay)

A

Substantial prejudice to the deft AND bad faith on behalf of the state

24
Q

Can judge use failure to accept responsibility in sentencing?

A

Only if give up right to remain silent and claimed innocence/blamed others

25
Q

Can you concede guilty for the defendant

A

Yes if they are not expressly objecting

26
Q

When can state comment on defense not presenting evidence

A

Affirmative defense—alibis, self defense, defense of others

27
Q

Brown v. State (FL Supreme Court 2018)

A

Upward departures are not allowed unless jury findings—does not apply retroactively, even for cases that were on appeal at the time

28
Q

Graham v Florida

A

No life without parole for non-homicide offenders under 18

29
Q

Miller v Alabama

A

Mandatory life without parole not ok

30
Q

Carpenter v US

A

Cell sites—need a warrant! Expectations of privacy from the 4th amendment for location