Important Cases Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

Apprendi

A

Jury must make findings to increase sentence over statutory max OTHER than prior convictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Blakely v Washington

A

6th amendment right to jury trial violated if judge increases sentence outside of guideline range without jury finding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Brady

A

Exonerating, exculpatory or impeaching evidence held by the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Giglio

A

State must disclose anything material affecting credibility of a witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Spencer v Florida

A

Death penalty hearing for defense to present evidence after jury finds death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strickland v Washington

A

IAC two things:
-counsel’s performance fell below an OBJECTIVE standard of reasonableness
-Reasonable probability it would have changed outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Faretta v California

A

Constitutional right to represent yourself but must be knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Alford pleas

A

Best interest plea not an admission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Nebbia hearing

A

Legit source of bond—not in FL but in federal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Alcorn violation

A

When attorney doesn’t convey plea offer, prejudice prong is different for Strickland analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Allen charge

A

Encourage deadlocked jury to reach a verdict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nelson hearing

A

Should court appointed counsel be removed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Melbourne objection

A

Race challenge—reaffirmed Neil basically—burden on party using the strike to give race neutral reason and not pretextual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Batson challenge

A

Race neutral reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ring v Arizona

A

Jury must decide aggravating factors for death penalty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Franks challenge

A

Challenging a search warrant based on false info—burden is on defendant!

17
Q

Arthur hearing standard

A

Proof evident, presumption great

18
Q

Huff hearing

A

Determines if evidentiary hearing appropriate in post conviction

19
Q

Atkins hearing

A

Determines if D is mentally retarded and ineligible for death penalty

20
Q

Bruton Violation

A

Can’t use co-defs confession implicating def

21
Q

Garcia hearing

A

Waiving conflict in being rep’d by same lawyer

22
Q

Quarterman agreement

A

Sentence up to max if no show for sentencing

23
Q

Jackson v state (test for due process violation and pre indictment delay)

A

Substantial prejudice to the deft AND bad faith on behalf of the state

24
Q

Can judge use failure to accept responsibility in sentencing?

A

Only if give up right to remain silent and claimed innocence/blamed others

25
Can you concede guilty for the defendant
Yes if they are not expressly objecting
26
When can state comment on defense not presenting evidence
Affirmative defense—alibis, self defense, defense of others
27
Brown v. State (FL Supreme Court 2018)
Upward departures are not allowed unless jury findings—does not apply retroactively, even for cases that were on appeal at the time
28
Graham v Florida
No life without parole for non-homicide offenders under 18
29
Miller v Alabama
Mandatory life without parole not ok
30
Carpenter v US
Cell sites—need a warrant! Expectations of privacy from the 4th amendment for location