Important cases: Occupier's liability Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

1:Wheat v E Lacon & Co. Ltd (1966)

A

There can be more than one occupier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1:Harris v Birkenhead Corporation (1976)

A

Who has control of the premises is the key point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

1:Bailey v Armes (1996)

A

Sometimes there is no one in control and thus no-one to sue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

1: s1(3)a OLA 1957

A

Define premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1:OLA 1957 s1(2)

A

Includes invitees (people invited in/have express permission) licensees (express/implied permission to be on land at a specific time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

1:OLA 1957 s5(1)

A

those with contractual permission (eg if you have a ticket to a concert)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

1:OLA 1957 s2(6)

A

those with statutory rights of entry (e.g police, fire service, ambulance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1:Lowery v Walker (1911)

A

if implied licence in common law [if the occupier is aware of repeated trespass and does nothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1:Taylor v Glasgow City Council (1922))

A

this is more likely to be found if there is an ‘allurement’ (something particularly attractive) on the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1:OLA 1984

A

If not a lawful visitor, is a trespasser.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2: s2(2) OLA (1957)

A

Duty of care owed to visitor: “take such care as in all the circumstances….is reasonable to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purpose for which he is invited….to be there”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2: British Rail Board v Herrington (1972)

A

Duty of care owed to trespasser: “Duty owed to common humanity”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

2:s s(1)(a) OLA 1984

A

Duty of care owed to trespasser: Duty owed to people other than lawful visitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2: (s(1)(3) Occupiers’ Liability Act(1984)

A

Duty of care owed to trespasser: duty only owed if:
- Aware of the danger or have reasonable grounds to believe it exists
- Know or have reasonable grounds to believe that the other is in the vicinity of the danger or that they may come into the vicinity of the danger
The risk is one against which, in all the circumstances of the case, they may be expected to offer the other some protection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3:Roles v Nathan (1963)

A

No duty for occupier to warn tradesmen of common dangers of trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3: Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council (2003)

A

No liability for obvious dangers (trespassers)

17
Q

3:Donaghue v Folkestone Visitors

A

Time of day/year important when imposing liability

18
Q

3:Laverton v Kiapasha Takeaway

A

No duty to mitigate all risk – only reasonable steps requirement

19
Q

3:Higgs v Foster (2004)

A

No liability if occupier not aware of danger (trespasser) under s1(2)

20
Q

3: Dean and Chapter of Rochester Cathedral v Debell (2016)

A

No duty to prevent every day trips and slips.
No duty to maintain perfect risk-free state
Only liable if ‘risk which causes a real source of danger’

21
Q

3:Taylor v Glasgow Corporation (1922)

A

Occupiers must expect children to be less careful than adults and protect against hidden allurements

22
Q

3:English Heritage v Taylor (2016)

A

Warning signs do count

23
Q

3: Darby v National Trust (2001)

A

No duty to warn against obvious dangers

24
Q

3: Bottomley v Todmorton Cricket Club (2003)

A

D liable if not taken reasonable steps to avoid danger

25
3: White Lion Hotel v James (2021)
V’s freely chosen risk does not necessarily negate the D’s liability
26
4: Trustees of PYAC v Poppleton (2008)
Risk of harm must come from occupiers’ action, omission or state of affairs of land
27
4:Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee and (1969)
Factual Causation: if not ‘but for’ the defendants act or omission, the injury would not have happened.
28
4: Bradford v Robinson Rentals (1967)
Foreseeable Harm (LEGAL CAUSATION)
29
4: Doughty V Turner Asbestos (1964)
Unforeseeable Harm - remoteness (LEGAL CAUSATION)
30
4: The Wagon Mound (1961)/ Reeves v Commissioner of Police (2000)
Damage must not be too remote and there should be a clear link between cause and consequence.
31
4: Smith v Leech Brain and Co (1962)
take your victim as you find them, known as the ‘eggshell skull’ rule. Confirmed in Bhamra v Dubb (2010)
32
4: Paris v Stepney Borough Council
employers should take reasonable care
33
5: Revill v Newbery (1996)
Contributory negligence (s2(3) OLA 1957)- claimant is partly responsible for the injuries he or she has suffered. If successfully argued the amount of compensation will be reduced by such amount
34
5: Gough v Thorns (1956))
The claimant failed to take proper care in the circumstances for their own safety
35
5: s1(6) OLA 1984
Consent (volenti non fit injuria) : 1. Knowledge of risk. 2. Exercise of free choice by claimant. 3. voluntary acceptance of risk.
36
6: (Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Company (1880)
General rules on damages in Tort apply: Compensatory damages
37
6: (Pickett v British Rail Engineering Ltd (1980)
Loss of earnings
38
6: Kemp and Kemp
quantified damages