Improper Pressure Flashcards

1
Q

What is duress?

A

Where one party enters into a contract as a result of threats, this only has to be a contributing factor not the sole cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What case shows duress by threats?

A

Barton v Armstrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the court say was needed for duress to be made out in the case of Pao On v Lau Yiu?

A

‘A coercion of will which vitiates consent, mere commercial pressure is not enough’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What should be looked at in deciding whether there was a coercion of will?

A

-Whether they protested
-Whether an alternative course was available
-If independent advise was sought
-If after entering the contract the party tried to avoid it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is economic duress?

A

Where one party puts pressure on the other to accept the terms of a contract and the other has no reasonable option but to accept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the two opposing tests for economic duress and which cases do these come from?

A

-Was the pressure exerted legitimate or not? (The Universe Sentinel)
-Was there commercial pressure that vitiated consent? (Pao On v Lau Yiu)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was held in the case of Atlas Express Ltd v Kafco?

A

Ordinary commercial pressure is not enough to vitiate consent, however a threat to breach an existing contract can amount to illegitimate pressure and therefore economic duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was decided in The Evia Luck case?

A

Economic pressure will amount to duress where it was illegitimate and a significant cause for the plaintiff to enter into the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does the Evia Luck case move away from the older cases?

A

Moved away from the idea of vitiated consent, the test in Pao On focused more of the effect on the innocent party whilst here focus is on the conduct of the accused party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the most recent case on economic duress and what did it tell us?

A

Time Travels v Pakistan International Airlines,
said the doctrine was in its infancy. For a claim to succeed there must be illegitimate threat/pressure, which caused them to enter into the agreement and the party has no reasonable alternative but to accept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is undue influence?

A

Where one party is able to exercise unfair influence over the other due to a relation of dependence or confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two types of undue influence and what case showed this?

A

-Allcard v Skinner
-Actual undue influence: the gift was the result of influence expressly used
-Presumed undue influence: Where the relations between the donor and donee gives rise to a presumption that the donee had undue influence over the donor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Where does the burden of proof lie with actual undue influence?

A

Burden is on the party claiming to have been wronged, amount of evidence required varies based on circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the leading case for presumed undue influence?

A

Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What two things must be shown to raise a claim of undue influence?

A

1) A relationship of trust and confidence (e.g. parent to child, doctor to patient, but NOT partner to partner)
2) A transaction that calls for an explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is meant by an inequality of bargaining power?

A

Suggested as a principle in Lloyds Bank v Bundy, idea would give relief to parties who enter into contracts with unfair terms due to grievously impaired bargaining power

17
Q

Was the inequality of bargaining power doctrine accepted?

A

No, rejected in National Westminster Bank v Morgan and Alec Lobb v Total Oil, seems one party may always have more power without acting unconscionably