Inchoate Crimes Flashcards

1
Q

What are the inchoate crimes?

A
  1. Solicitation
  2. Attempt
  3. Conspiracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition of Solicitation

A
  • Enticing,
  • advising,
  • inciting,
  • inducing,
  • urging, or
  • otherwise encouraging another to commit a felony or breach of the peace
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When is the solicitation complete?

A

At the time the soliciation is made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A solicitor is treated as?

A

An accessory before the fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What will the solicitor be guilty of?

A

Any solicited crime by the solicitee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Modern statutes defensens to solicitation

A
  • Specific intent defenses such as voluntary intoxication and unreasonable mistake
  • Impossibility and withdrawal not defenses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Elements of Attempt

A
  1. A specific intent to bring about a criminal result; and
  2. A significant overt act in furtherance of that intent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is the attempt complete?

A

When the target crime is complete

(attempt and the target crime merge)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a significant overt act?

A

An act beyond “mere” preparation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Common law bandonment defense to Attempt

A

Abandonment is not a defense once attempt is complete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Abandonment defense under MPC

A

Voluntary and complete abandonment can be used as a defense

Voluntary = a true change of heart

Complete = ∆ is not merelyl postponing commission of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Legal impossiblity defense

A

∆ did all the things he intended to do, but his act did not constitute a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a Conspiracy?

A

An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime

*actual agreement is needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Must the agreement be express?

A

No.

The agreement may be proved circumstantially

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mental state required for conspiracy?

A
  • Intent to agree, and
  • Itnent to achieve the objective of the agreement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Overt Act Requirement

A

An overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is required for conspiracy liability

17
Q

Pinkerton Doctrine

A

Each conspirator is liable for the crimes of all other co-conspirators where the crimes were both:

  1. a foreseeable outgrowth of the conspiracy; and
  2. committed in furtherance of the conspiratorial goal

*Most jurisdictions reject the Pinkerton doctrine and impose liability on conspirators merely upon the basis of the agreement

18
Q

Wharton Rule

A
  • In crimes where 2 or more people are necessary for the commission of the offense,
  • there is no conspiracy unless the agreement involves an additional person who is not essential to the definition of that crime
19
Q

Defenses to Conspiracy

A
  1. Common law = withdrawal
  2. MPC = renunciation
20
Q

Withdrawal

A

Withdrawal is not a defense, BUT may cut off further liability for crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy IF the withdrawing conspirator communicates his withdrawal to each of the co-conspirators

21
Q

Renunciation

A
  • if co-conspirator withdraws; AND
  • performs an affirmative act to thwart the success of the conspiracy,
  • then can use the renunciation as an affirmative defense to the conspiracy