Incidence and Prevalence Quiz 1 Flashcards
(36 cards)
Ecological study
Aggregate measures: association between exposure and outcome at the group level
- good for hypothesis generation
- Ecological fallacy (aggregation bias): inappropriately drawing conclusions from population level to individual level
Cross sectional study
Unit is the individual Can determine associations between exposures and diseases at individual level
- may be used to assess prevalence, prevalence ratio -not good for estimating risk
- incidence-prevalence bias when exposure affects survival - temporal order of exposure and outcome cannot be established
Case control study
- individuals selected according to disease status
- cases and controls derived from same population
- study question: what is the frequency of exposure among cases vs controls
- measure of association= odds ratio
- may suffer from selection bias and recall bias
Cohort study
Goal to calculate risk or rate of specific disease or event
- usual goal to calculate association between a specific exposure and risk or rate of a specific disease
- bias loss to follow up
Calculation of prevalence
Prevalence = # of existing cases of disease/total population at risk at a given point in time/Total population at risk ata given point in time
Point prevalence
- numerator = # of cases at one point in time (cross-sectional)
- denominator = population at time of assessment
Period prevalence
- numerator = # all existing cases and new cases that occur during a given time period
- denominator = average reference population over the specified time period
- good when difficult to know when a disease began (chronic illness etc)
- lifetime prevalence = the proportion of a population that at some point in their life have experienced the condition
Study Design Flow Chart

Factors affecting prevalence
- faster recovery time -
- increased incidence ^
- better reporting ^
- in-migration of noncases -
- in-migration of cases ^
- improved cure rate -
- new treatment extends survival time ^
- out-migrartion of cases -
- decreased mortality of cases ^
- increased mortality among cases -
- decreased incidence -
Odds
Odds are defined as the ratio of the probability to the ‘non event’ (all other outcomes)
- probability of an event = p
- probability of a non-event = 1-p
- Odds = p/ (1-p)
Why use odds?
- Odds rartio can approximate risk under cirtain circumstances
- Logistic regression has favorable statistical properties, and produces odds ratios
What is incidence?
The proportion or rate of NEW events or cases that develop in a population of individuals at risk during a specific time interval
- implies follow-up over time (cohort studies)
Cumulative incidence
- The probability of developing a disease (event) ina population at risk, during a specified period of time (also called RISK)
Incidence rate/density
The rate of developing a disease (event) in a population at risk per unit time.
- Rates have person time in denominator
Special types of incidence
- Mortality rates (usually per year)
- Case fatality rate (proportion not rate)
- Attack rate (proportion, not a rate)\
Incidence rate
*calculated using aggregate data
incidence rate= # of new cases/avg population*timeoverwhich cases occur
Assumptions:
- the risk of an event is constant over the observed time interval.
- ie the risk of n persons followed for t time is the same as t persons followed for n time
- independence between censoring and events
- does not require a fixed closed cohort
- population and demographics relatively stable throughout the time period (lack of secular trends
Incidence density
ID= # of events /person time
Assumptions:
- the risk of an event is constant over the observed time interval.
- ie the risk of n persons followed for t time is the same as t persons followed for n time
- independence between censoring and events
- does not require a fixed closed cohort
- population and demographics relatively stable throughout the time period (lack of secular trends
Incidence density example
n=10
events = 6 = numerator
person months = 115
Person years = 9.58
ID= 6/(115/12) = 6/9.58py = .63 events per person year * 100 = 63 events per 100 person years
When would you use calendar time instead of follow up time?
- Interim analyses of long term studies with dynamic cohorts
- If an exposure or outcome changed greatly over time (secular trend)
- includes birth cohort and period effects
Which method do I use?
- In general use the method that atkes imnto account all the info available to you
- if you have individula level data about each participants time on study, don’t calculate rate using avg population at risk. Instead, calculate incidence density–it will be more accurate
- Exceptions when comparing studies and more crude measures are used
Cumulative incidence (CI)
- most intuitive way to estimate risk
- Always a proportion 0-1
- Is unitless, but must specify a time period
- example: 60yo risk of heart disease 2% (over what time period?)
What is the most appropriate study design to calculate cumulative incidence?
Cohort study
Cumulative Incidence cont.
- When follow up is complete (no censoring, pop steady throughout study), CI = # of events (over a specified time period)/ initial population
- example: 1,000 men aged 69-89 initially free of prostate cancer are followed for 10 years. Over this time, 45 men develop prostate cancer. What is thew CI?
- CI = 45/1000 over 10 years = .0.045 over 10 years = 4.5% over 10yrs
Life table method
When we know people are censored but can assume they are censored uniformly through each follow-up time period:
- CI= # number of new cases or events/number of subjects at start of period minus 1/2 # of censored
