Industrial/Organizational Psychology Flashcards
(182 cards)
Job analysis
Systematic method for collecting the information needed to describe job requirements
Serves as the basis for developing criterion measures, provides info for job redesign, helps to identify causes of accidents
Broad methods of job analysis
Observing employees performing the job
Interviewing employees and/or supervisors
Reviewing company records
Having employees keep a job diary
Two specific types of methods used for job analysis
Job-oriented methods (tasks required for the job)
Worker-oriented methods (attributes of the employee that would lead to success in that job)
Job-oriented methods of job analysis
Provide information about the characteristics of the tasks that are performed on the job
Worker-oriented methods of job analysis
Provide information about the knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics (“KSAOs”) that a worker needs to perform the job successfully
Ex. Position Analysis Questionnaire
Strength to worker-oriented methods of job analysis
Produce data that is more helpful for designing training programs and deriving criterion measures that provide useful employee feedback
Job analysis v job evaluation
Job analysis - conducted to clarify the requirements of the job
Job evaluation - conducted to determine the worth of the jobs to set salaries and wages
Job analysis
Conducted to clarify the requirements of the job
Job evaluation
Conducted to determine the worth of the job for setting wages and salaries
Identify commendable factors: years of education, years of experience, degree of autonomy or responsibility, consequences of errors
Comparable worth
Determined through job evaluations
Ensures that people performing comparable work are receiving comparable pay
Usually done through some kind of performance evaluation (points system), so that salary is determined by the inherent value of the job
Criterion measures
Used to assess job performance
Two types of criterion measures
Objective - quantitative (don’t usually provide enough info)
Subjective - judgement-based rating scales (susceptible to bias)
Objective criterion measures
Qualitative measures of production
- ex. Number of units produced, number of units sold, absenteeism, tardiness, etc.
Disadvantages to objective criterion measurement
May be biased towards situational factors (differences in equipment, territory, supplies, etc.)
Many important aspects of job effectiveness can not be measured quantitatively (eg. working with peers, job motivation, etc.)
Cannot use these measures with complex professional, material or administrative jobs
Subjective criterion measures
Broadly
Evaluate employees based on ratings that reflect the judgement of the rater (usually a supervisor)
Peer, subordinate, and self-ratings can also be used when appropriate
Four characteristics of criterion measures
Ultimate v actual criterion - ultimate criterion is the conceptual and theoretical criterion, actual is the way performance is actually measured
Relevance - actual criterion’s construct validity (the degree to which it measures the ultimate criterion)
Deficiency - the degree to which the actual criterion does not reflect all aspects of the ultimate criterion
Contamination - when an actual criterion assess factors other than what it was designed to measure
Ultimate v Actual criterion
Ultimate - the theoretical or conceptual criterion (the accurate and complete measure of performance)
Ex. Psychotherapist ultimate criterion = provides effective treatment
Actual - the way performance is actually measured
Ex. Psychotherapist actual criterion = patient satisfaction with treatment
Relevance as it pertains to criterion measurement
Criterion relevance refers to the actual criterion s construct validity (the degree to which it measures the ultimate criterion)
Deficiency as it relates to criterion measures
Criterion deficiency is the degree to which an actual criterion does NOT measure all aspects of the ultimate criterion
(Limits criterion relevance)
Contamination as it relates to criterion measurement
Criterion contamination occurs when an actual criterion measures factors other than those it was designed to assess
Ex. Knowledge of an employees predictor performance
(Limits relevance of criterion measurement)
Two types of subjective criterion measurement
Relative (comparative) - compare 2+ employees to each other
Absolute - provide info on performance without comparisons
Advantages and disadvantages to absolute and relative techniques of subjective criterion measurement
Relative techniques can help alleviate rater biases
- BUT force the rater to rank employees (even if they’re all doing equally well)
Absolute techniques run the risk of rater bias
- BUT do not force you to unnaturally rank employees
Absolute techniques of subjective criterion measurement
Provide information on an employees performance without reference or comparison to other employees
Relative techniques for subjective criterion measurement
Require a rater to compare the performance of two or more employees