Industrial Psychology Flashcards
(100 cards)
Job Analysis: Description/Methods:
systematic method for collecting the information needed to describe job requirements and provide information that helps recruitment, selection, training program design
*information can be obtained by observing employees, perform the job, interviewing employees, supervisors, a reviewing company records.
Job oriented methods- provide information about the characteristics of a task that are performed on the job
Worker Oriented methods- provide information on the knowledge, skills, abilities that a worker needs
PAQ- completed by the job holder, supervisors, and provides quantitative information on six dimensions of worker activity.
Job Analysis vs Job Evaluation
Job Analysis- conducted to clarify the requirements of the job
Job Evaluation- performed to determine the relative worth of jobs in order to set salaries and wages.
Comparable Worth
a technique of job evaluations to ensure that people who are performing work of comparable value receive comparable pay.
Using the same job evaluation technique for all jobs within an organization so that the wages are established on the basis of each jobs inherent value
Objective Vs Subjective Measures
Objective- include quantitative measures such as units produced, sold or rejected , accidents, tardiness and salary.
Subjective Measures: most frequently used performance assessment techniques and take the form of ratings that reflect the judgement of the rater
*supervisors ratings are generally the most reliable
Ultimate vs Actual Criterion
ultimate criterion- known as the conceptual or theoretical criterion and refers to an accurate and complete measure of performance
Actual Criterion- way the performance is actually measured
Relative Rating Techniques: Paired Comparison, Forced Distribution
require the rater to compare the performance of two or more employees to each other
Paired Comparison: rater compares each ratee with every other ratee in pairs on one or more dimensions of job performance
Forced Distribution: involves assigning ratees to a limited number of categories based on a predefined normal distribution on one or more dimensions of job performance
Absolute Rating Technique-
provide information on a ratee’s performance without reference or comparison to other employees
Critical Incident Technique
involves first deriving a checklist of critical incidents by having the supervisor observe employees while they work and record specific behaviors that are associated with outstanding and poor performance.
* only addresses extreme job behaviors*
Forced Choice Rating Scale
consists of two to four alternatives that are considered to be about equal in terms of desirability and the rater selects the alternative that best or least describes the ratee
BARS
Behaviorally anchored rating scale- supervisors or other familiar with the job identify several independent dimensions of job behaviors, (job knowledge, motivation) identify several behavioral anchors( critical incidents) and order and number the behavioral anchors within each dimension from least to most positive or desirable
Rater choses the one behavior for each dimension that best describes the employee.
*easy to provide specific feedback, increases interrater reliabilty,
Rater Biases:
Leniency /Strictness
Leniency and strictness occur when a rater tends to avoid the middle range of a rating scale and rates all employees as either too high ( leniency) or too low( strictness)
Central Tendency Bias
refers to a raters consistent use of only the middle range of the rating scale
Halo Bias
occurs when a raters evaluation of an employee on one dimension of job performance affects his or her evaluation of that employee on other unrelated dimensions or when raters general impression of an employee influences how the rater rates the employee on all dimensions. Can be positive or negative
Frame of reference training
provides raters with a common understanding of the multidimensional nature of job example, provides raters with a common understanding of the job performance, and what is effective and ineffective performance on each dimension
*rater bias can be reduced by having raters rate specific behaviors rather than global or traits.
Adverse Impact/80% Rule
Title VII of the civil rights acts of 1964 and other legislations prohibit discrimination in hiring, placement, training, promotion, and retention on the basis of race, religion, origin, age,
EEOC- equal employment selection procedures-
selection test- has adverse impact when use of that procedure results in a substantially different selection,, placement, or promotion rate for members of that group.
80% ( Four Fifths) Rule- often used to determine if a procedure has an adverse impact,
hiring rate for the majority group is multiplied by 80% to determine the minimum hiring rate for the minority group.
Differential Validity vs unfairness
Differential validity occurs when there is a significant difference in the validity coefficients obtained for subgroups and the correlations found in one or both of these groups are significantly different from zero.
Unfairness- occurs when members of one group consistently obtain lower scores on the predictor than members of another group, but the difference in predictor scores is not related to differences in scores on the criterion.
Reliability:
refers to the extent to which performance on a measure is unaffected by measurement error
Differential Validity vs unfairness
Differential validity occurs when there is a significant difference in the validity coefficients obtained for subgroups and the correlations found in one or both of these groups are significantly different from zero.
Unfairness- occurs when members of one group consistently obtain lower scores on the predictor than members of another group, but the difference in predictor scores is not related to differences in scores on the criterion.
- employer can use of several defenses to jutisfy continued use of the procedure such as a business necessity, prove that its use is required for the safe and efficient operation.
Incremental Validity
increase in decision making accuracy an employer will achieve by using the predictor to make selection decisions
Selection Ratio/Base Rate
is the ratio of job openings to job applicants.
example a selection ratio of 1.50 indicates that there is one job opening for every fifty applicants
Low selection rate- (many applicants for one or a few jobs) is preferred, the employer can raise the predictor cutoff score and thereby reduce the risk of hiring flase positives( individuals who score high on the predictor but low on the criterion)
Base rate- percent of employees who are performing satisfactorily without use of the proposed predictor and ranges in value from 0 to 1.0 .
Moderate base rates ( base rates close to .50) are associated with the greatest incremental validity.
Taylor Russel Tables
can be used to estimate the percent of new hires that will be successful ( the success ratio) as employees given various combinations of validity coefficients, selection ratios, and base rates.
Multiple Regression vs Multiple Cutoff
Multiple Regression: predtictor scores are weighted and summed to yield an estimated criterion score, with each predictor weight being determined by its correlation with the criterion and other predictors.
*compensatory since exceptional performance on one predictor can offset poor performance on another predictor.
Multiple cutoff- noncompensatory which means that a minimum score on each predictor must be obtained before a job applicant will be considered for selection. , can be used in conjunction with multiple regression by first selecting only those people above the minimum cutoff point on all predictors
General mental Cognitive Ability Tests
consistently produce the highest validity coeffiencents across jobs and job settings.
average correlation of .53 when criterion is performance ratings and .75 when criterion is an objective measure of performance
Personality tests/Big 5 traits
can be useful in organizational settings,
**conscioustiousness has been found to be the best predictor of job performance across different jobs, job settings, and criterion measures