Informal Fallacies Flashcards

(12 cards)

1
Q

Post Hoc, Ergo prompter hoc

A

(also ‘casual’ fallacy)

Assuming a casual (cause and effect) relationship exists when there is merely correlation. (3 variations)
1. x preceded (before) y -> x caused y
2. x and y coexist -> x caused y
3. x caused y -> the absence of x will mean no y

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ad hominem

A

Attacking a person or insulting them rather than their argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Straw man

A

Intentionally misrepresenting someone’s argument so that its easier to attack (twisting words/ putting words in their mouth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

False Dilemma

A

Falsely representing 2 choices as if they are the only choices available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Begging the question

A

Circular reasoning or assuming the truth of the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ad populum

A

When we give praise or blame to an argument or idea simply because it accords with the majority/popular view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ad personam

A

Judging an argument according to how we feel about it (e.g feeling uncomfortable with the idea of a argument or agreeing to it) rather than judging it based off its merits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Genetic fallacy

A

Judging the accuracy or credibility of a claim according to its ORIGIN (a conclusion is reached regarding somethings present nature from premises about its origin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Appeal to Law

A

When following the law is assumed to be morally correct thing to do, without justification, or when breaking the law is assumed to be the morally wrong thing to do, without justification.

forms:
x is illegal, therefore x is immoral
y is legal, therefore y is moral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Naturalistic

A

An arguer equates what is natural to what is good or right and what is unnatural to bad or wrong (can be the other way round)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fallacy of equivocation

A

Misuse/misrepresentation the meaning of words (making context change)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fallacy of composition

A

Assuming + generalising info/groups of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly