Institutional Investors Flashcards
(41 cards)
5 Common Characteristics of Institutional Investors
- Scale (Size)
- Long-Term Investment Horizon
- Regulatory Framework
- Governmental Framework
- Principal Agent Issues
IPS of Institutional Investors Should Include
- Mission and Investment Objectives Return and Risk Tolerance
- Discussion of the time horizon and liabilities as that need to be paid off
- Any External Constraints: Legal, regulation, taxation, and accounting
- Asset Allocation Policy: ranges, weights, and asset class benchmarks
- Rebalancing Policy
- Reporting Requirements
Approaches to Asset Allocation
- Norway Model
- Yale Model “Endowment Model”
- Canadian Pension Plan Model
- Liability Driving Investment
Norway Model
- 60% equities and 40% bonds
- Passive allocation to public securities
- Little to no exposures to alternatives
- Tight tracking error limits
- Advantages: Lowest costs and fees, easy for communication
- Disadvantages: Passively managed, no opportunities for outperform the markets
Yale Model
- High allocation to alternatives; around 50%
- Assets are managed externally
- Advantages: Potential to outperform the markets (actively managed)
Disadvantages:
* Difficult for a smaller institutions to implement
* Higher fees and costs
* Difficult for larger management due to limits of capacity
Canadian Pension Plan Model
- High Allocation to Alternatives
- Significant amounts of active management
- The assets will be managed internally and due diligence
- Ability to outperform the market
- Disadvantages: More expensive and difficult to manage
Liability Driven Model
- Maximize the surplus
- Management limits the volatility of the surplus
- Taken into account the liability
- Longevity risks is difficult to hedge (lifespans)
Defined Benefit Plan (DB)
- Less prevent, traditionally set up a legal entity with a trust
- Must hire an actuary to determine the benefits due
- Assume risks if not enough funds
- Surplus: Any additional can be used to pay for other expenses such as an actuary
- Longevity Risks
- Plan sponsor makes contributions to plan
- Comparing FMV of assets by the projected benefit obligation “PBO” (PVDBO IFRS)
- Gives the economic status of the plan, must be placed on the balance sheet
Considerations that Drive the Risks Tolerance for a DB Plan
- Plans funded status
- Sponsors Financial Status
- The size of the plan compared to the sponsor
- Common risk exposure
- Any provisions for early retirement “lump sum distributions:
- Workforce characteristics
- Correlations between the sponsor and plan assets
Liquidity Needs of a DB Plan
Liquidity needs are generally higher if:
* The workforce is older
* Larger proportion of relived lives in the plan that are receiving benefits
* Lower the Funded Status Plan
* If there is a provision to withdraw or switch from the plan
Investment Objective of a DB Plan
Primary Objective: Achieve a target rate of return over a long-term investment horizon to maintain a level of risk consistent with their contracted liabilities
Secondary Objective: Might not be for every plan. Could be to minimize the cash contributions that the plans sponsor has to make, in present value terms PBO > Plan assets
Discount Rate Change of a DB Plan
Higher Discount Rate: Reduces the present value of the liabilities (PBO) and would reduce the need for sponsor contributions to the plan (raises the funded status)
Lower Discount Rate: Increases the present value of the liabilities (PBO) and would increase the need for sponsor contributions to the plan (lowers the funded status)
Defined Contribution (DC) Plans
- Employee saves for retirement and the employer could match an amount
- Very little accounting by the employer
- Performance risk is born by the employee
- Metrics of outperformance any kind is to a passive benchmark or default option
Sovereign Wealth Funds Categories
Investment funds owned by a government there are 5-broad categories:
* Budget Stabilization Funds
* Development Funds
* Savings funds
* Reserve Funds
* Pension Reserve Funds
Sovereign Wealth Funds - External Constraints
Establish by law, gives the mission structure to avoid political influence they need
* High Quality Governance
* Independent
* Transparency
* Accountability
Santiago Principal
Best principal framework that address the external constraints
Budget Stabilization Funds
- Set up when a countries revenues are heavy linked to a natural resources or cyclical industries
- Main Objective: Insulate the budget and economy from commodity price volatility, economic cycles, and external shocks.
- Liquidity Needs: Maintain the highest level of liquidity and invests in assets of low risk in order to meet short-term deficits created by negative economic situation.
- Invest In: Cash and fixed income; has high liquidity need
Development Funds
- For national social economical projects that support key industries
- Main Objective: Fund priority socioeconomic projects.
- Liquidity Needs: Longer-term, Low Liquidity needs
- Invest In: Local infrastructural projects; long-term
Savings Funds
- Invest revenues for the benefits of future generations.
- Main Objective: Fund pension-like liabilities of the government
- Liquidity Needs: Are low, but increase when the government withdrawals from the funds
- Invest In: Equities, Private Equity, and Real Estate
Reserve Funds
- Created or designed to earn returns on excess foreign reserves held by central banks.
- Main Objective: To increase returns or reduce the negative carrying costs of government reserves.
- Liquidity Needs: Generally, hold liquid fixed income securities, asset sold pretty easily
- Invest In: Equities, Private Equity, and Real Estate, but it has a higher liquidity needs so, the alternative allocation will be less than the savings funds
Pension Reserve Funds
- Used to save and invest in order to meet any future pension liabilities
- Main Objective: Is to share wealth across generations usually to high revenues from nonrenewable assets (oil reserves).
- Liquidity Needs: Various; lower duration the accumulation stage and higher during the payment stage
- Invest In: Higher Allocations to equities and alternatives due to long investment horizons and lower liquidity needs.
University Endowment
- Set up by gifts and donations which are invested to provide ongoing support to the operating budget
- 10% of operating budget is consider low while 40-60% is high; this effects the risk tolerance
- The time horizon is in perpetuity
- Most large universities will follow the endowment model alternatives (>50%)
- Smaller universities will invest with a home bias; normally in equities and fixed income
- Normally they have a tax-exempt status and maintain conditional rules
- Liquidity needs are usually 2-4% it is the annual spending net of gifts and donations
The Endowment Spending Policy
Integration of equity while smoothing payouts to integrate with volatility.
The dollar amount of spending each year is a weighted average of 2 components
* Their previous years spending adjusted for inflation
* Spending rate (real rate, usually 3-4%) applied to among average of AUM
In general, the spending rate for the endowment is about 5%
The Endowment Spending Rules
A. Constant growth rule (w=1): The endowment is providing a fixed (real) annual payout of the university adjusted for inflation. The percentage of endowment (pays out) will fluctuate with value of the assets.
B. Market Value Rule (w = 0): Procyclical the spending will fluctuate in line with the moving average of AUM
C. Hybrid Rule (0 < w < 1): A weighted average of the other 2 rules