Institutions Flashcards

(7 cards)

1
Q

What paper shows clearly the impact of institutions on one country?

A
  • Acemoglu and Robinson (2012) - why nations fail
  • takes Korea as a natural experiment
  • After WW2 exogenous shock they were divided
  • North had communist institutions
  • South was more capitalist
  • Today South Korea has 10x the income of South Korea
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are institutions?

What are the two types?

A

Institutions are the rules of the game (1990)
- humanly devised
- set constraints
- shape incentives

Formal - Codified in law
informal - social norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What paper speaks about how it is difficult to set up colonies institutions

A

Acemoglu and Robinson (2012)

  • Argue the Spaniards had trouble colonising the hunter gatherers in Buenos Aireas.
  • While in Paraguay they were able to enslave the Guarani people
    / also had a more hierarchy

As a result, they were able to set up extractive institutions in Paraguay.

Also speak about Virginia company
- tried to force settlers to work
- they failed
so they had to give settlers 50 ares of land and early inclusive institutions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What paper gives a case study on the persistence of institutions?

A
  • Dell (2010) uses the mita boundary to run a RDD on how those in the mita boundary were impacted.
  • Those in Mita boundary had to send 1/7 of people to work in the silver mines
  • it was abolished in 1812 but persistent 200 years later
  • the results of the RDD:
  • those in the mita boundary today have 25% less consumption and higher child stunting rates.
  • persistent impact on property rights
  • negative impact on public goods
  • residents of mita today are likely to work in subsistence farming.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the paper that works out the causal impact of institution on income per capita.

A
  • AJR (2001)
  • Research question:
    Why are some countries rich and others poor, through the lens of institutions
  • main argument:
    Institutions especially protection of property rights are the key factor .
  • Institutions may be endogenous
  • Empirical approach:
    Use IV of settler mortality, to isolate causality
  • Specific approach
  • Firstly, institutions today are regressed on settler mortality. (Settler mortality used as IV)
  • Second stage, income per capita regressed on predicted institutions.
    Captures causal effect of institutions on income

Results:
- Settler mortality - institutions, higher settler mortality led to extractive institutions
- Better institutions impact income
2SLS coefficient of institutions 0.9
Institutions can account for 3/4 of income variation today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the Caveats for AJR (2012)

A
  • Some countries like Britain had inclusive institutions at home and extractive ones in colonies Sachs (2013)
  • They understate the role of geography as it was important (Diamond)
    Geog gave enabled the institutions to work better
  • When you look within countries human capital matters more (Shleifer et a 2012) - not statistically significant
  • Are institutions completely exogenous or do culture matter?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why can we not just look at institutions?

A

We must account for culture which is underlying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly