INSURANCE ACTS Flashcards

1
Q

SECT A: RATE FILINGS

APPROACHES TO FILING RATES (6)

A
  1. STATE MANDATED RATES - MUST USE RATES SET BY STATE
  2. PRIOR APPROVAL - FILE, WAIT TO GET STATE APPROVAL OF RATE BEFORE USING
  3. FILE & USE - USE WITHIN A PERIOD OF FILING
  4. USE & FILE - USE IMMED AND FILE WITHIN PERIOD OF USE
  5. FLEX - IF RATE CHANGE > THRESHOLD, FILE & USE; O/W USE & FILE
  6. NO FILING - OPEN MARKET/COMPETITION WILL SET FAIR RATES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SECT A: RATE FILINGS

BASES FOR RATE CHANGE DISAPPROVAL (5)

A
  1. REGULATORY - FAILURE TO MEET MINIMUM SOLVENCY STANDARDS
  2. REGULATORY - ILLEGAL
  3. REGULATORY - CONTRARY TO PUBLIC INTEREST
  4. ACTUARIAL - UNFAIRLY DISCRIMINATORY
  5. ACTUARIAL - EXCESSIVE/INADEQUATE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

BUSINESS OF INSURANCE - UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS

A
  1. LICENSING OF AGENTS & BROKERS
  2. SETTING OF RATES
  3. SELLING & ADVERTISING OFPOLICIES
  4. INSURER UNDERWRITES POLIYHOLDER RISK
  5. CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN INSURER & POLICYHOLDER
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

PAUL V VIRGINIA

A

Business of insurance is NOT interstate commerce
• Insurance contracts transactions are delivered locally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT

A

SHERMANOPOLY BIC
• Prohibits collusion via Boycott, Intimidation, Coercion to gain monopoly power
• Application of this act repealed in insurance => SEUA formed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

CLAYTON ANTITRUST ACT

A

Illegal PTEM activities
• Identified illegal activities
1. price discrimination
2. tying products
3. exclusive dealings
4. merger of competitors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT

A

Price discrimination okay
• If it can be shown that the price differential is a result of operational efficiencies from “competing in good faith”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

SEUA SUPREME COURT RULING

A

Business of insurance is subject to Sherman Antitrust Act
• Q1: Did Congress intend that the Sherman act apply to fire insurance? YES
• Q2: Do insurance transactions that stretch across state lines constitute “commerce among the several states”, which is subject to the Commerce Clause? YES
o Individuals from different states can buy insurance from the same insurance company
o Intangible products (electrical pulses of telegraphs) are subject to Congressional regulation
o Non-insurance business contracts sold outside of HQ state are subject to Congressional regulation
o 18/200 members domiciled in only 1 of 6 SEUA states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

MCCARRON-FERGUSON ACT

A

State vs federal regulation of insurers
• Antitrust acts apply to business of insurance
• States have primary regulatory control over business of insurance, except
1. Antitrust acts apply to business of insurance antitrust activities, including Sherman Antitrust Act
2. Federal antitrust laws apply to activities not addressed by state laws
3. Federal laws enacted specifically to regulate the business of insurance preempt any state laws applying to these same activities
• For McC-F to preempt antitrust acts:
1. Prior rate approval
2. Rate filing process
3. Role of rating organizations
4. Anti-rebating laws in states that allow them
 Prohibits insurers from returning portions of premiums and producers from returning portions of commissions to those who buy insurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT/FINANCIAL SERVICES MODERNIZATION ACT

A

State vs federal regulation of bank-insurer affiliations
• Addressed state v federal regulation of bank-insurer affiliations
o Each financial sector regulated separately
o States have primary responsibility for insurers
• Provisions
1. States prohibited from preventing bank affiliates from selling insurance on same terms as insurance producers
2. Banks must use an insurance affiliate of a financial holding company to sell insurance, not its own subsidiary
3. Banks must disclose privacy policies
4. States must facilitate insurance producer’s ability to operate in multiple states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM & CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

A
  1. Federal Reserve System (Fed) has limited regulatory authority over two categories of insurers, to prevent systemic risk
    i. Systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs)
    ii. Insurers holding companies with banks & thrifts
  2. Formation of US Treasury’s Federal Insurance Office (FIO) to monitor insurance industry
    • Ensures US insurers have international equivalence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

REQUIREMENTS OF FED-REGULATED INSURERS (4)

A
  1. ADHERE TO CAPITAL STANDARDS
  2. MEET LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS
  3. UNDERGO STRESS TESTING
  4. DEVELOP LIVING WILLS/RESOLUTION PLANS IN CASE OF BANKRUPTCY
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

SIFI CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES (4)

A
  1. NEBULOUS DESIGNATION CRITERIA; NO RULES ON HOW TO AVOID
  2. BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL REGULATION
  3. INSURERS & BANKS HAVE DIFFERENT BUSINESS MODELS
  4. INSURERS MADE A MINIMAL IMPACT IN GREAT RECESSION
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

ACTUARIAL CONCERNS ABOUT DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM & CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (4)

A
  1. STANDARDIZATION MAY TURN INS PRODUCTS INTO A COMMODITY, REDUCING PROFIT MARGIN & COMPETITION
  2. INCREASE ON CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
  3. SIGNIFICANT COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR INSURERS WITH BANKING AFFILIATES
  4. DUAL REGULATION (AT STATE & FEDERAL LEVEL)
    I. FEDERAL REGULATION IS RESTRICTIVE & EXPENSIVE TO INSURERS
    II. NEW ACCTG & SOLVCY STANDARDS => INCONSISTENT PLAYING FIELD IN INS MARKET
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

SIFI CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES (4)

A
  1. NEBULOUS DESIGNATION CRITERIA; NO RULES ON HOW TO AVOID
  2. BURDEN OF ADDITIONAL REGULATION
  3. INSURERS & BANKS HAVE DIFFERENT BUSINESS MODELS
  4. INSURERS MADE A MINIMAL IMPACT IN GREAT RECESSION
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SECT A: INSURANCE ACTS

PROS & CONS OF US INTERNATIONAL EQUIVALENCY (1+/3-)

A

(+) CONSISTENCY IN DOMESTIC & INTL STANDARDS
(-) TEAM USA (FED, FIO & NAIC) HAVE DIFFERENT MISSIONS & GOALS
(-) FEDERAL PROCESS NOT AS TRANSPARENT AS STATE PROCESSES
(-) CLOSED-DOOR PROCEDURES, SO NO OBSERVER PARTICIPATION IN WORKING GROUPS

17
Q

SECT A: FEDERAL REGULATION OF NON-INSURANCE BUSINESS

EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT (ERISA)

A

ENACTED TO CURB ABUSE IN PRIVATE PENSION SYSTEM & EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

18
Q

SECT A: FEDERAL REGULATION OF NON-INSURANCE BUSINESS

OCCUPATIONAL SAFTEY & HEALTH ACT (3)

A
  1. SOME FED-APPROVED STATE OSHA PROGRAMS; OTHERWISE FED-REGULATED
  2. WORKPLACE SAFETY & HEALTH STANDARDS FOR EMPLOYERS & EMPLOYEES
  3. GENERAL DUTY CLAUSE: EMPLOYERS MUST ALSO MAINTAIN WORKPLACES FREE OF RECOGNIZED HAZARDS THAT COULD LEAD TO SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH
19
Q

SECT A: FEDERAL REGULATION OF NON-INSURANCE BUSINESS

CIVIL RIGHTS ACT (4)

A

ANTIDISCRIMINATORY LEGISLATION PROBITING EMPLOYER DISCRIMINATION AGAINST
1. RACE
2. ANCESTRY
3. COLOUR
4. ETHNIC CHARACTERISTICS

20
Q

SECT A: FEDERAL REGULATION OF NON-INSURANCE BUSINESS

AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT ACT (ADEA)

A

ANTIDISCRIMINATORY LEGISLATION PROHIBITING AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIPS FOR 40+ YR OLDS

21
Q

SECT A: FEDERAL REGULATION OF NON-INSURANCE BUSINESS

OLD WORKERS BENEFIT PROTECTION ACT (2)

A

ADEA AMENDMENT PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST OLDER WORKERS WRT BENEFITS; ILLEGAL TO
1. REFUSE EMPLOYMENT DUE TO HIGH COST IN BENEFITS
2. REDUCE/DISCONTINUE PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS WHEN EMPLOYEE REACHES A CERTAIN AGE
* EXCEPTION: THOSE BASED ON SIGNIFICANT COST CONSIDERATIONS