Intelligence Led Policing Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

What was policing like in the 19th and 20th century?

A
  • community orientated policing
  • the primary role of crime prevention
  • achieved through community contact and therefore ‘local knowledge’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was policing like in the 1960S and during rapid change in society?

A
  • new ways to commit crime (tech advancing)
  • intro of radios to direct police response
  • more crime, same/fewer resources
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was policing like in the mid-20th century when policing was reactive?

A
  • rapid response, crime investigation, and crime-fighting became a model with collators managing intelligence
  • intelligence police generated - stop, check, sightings, etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was policing like in the 1970s-1980s where there was the reactive crime investigation model?

A
  • more detections = incentive not to commit as there’s a capture risk
  • typically a BCU of 200 officers may have had 1 crime prevention officer
  • crime increase meant Police weren’t detecting enough to make the argument that more detections = reduction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was policing like in the 1980s?

A
  • surveillance teams in forces - previously limited to RCS and serious crime (costly)
  • forces began to develop intelligence use but in ‘silos’
  • elitism
  • no intelligence structure, no formality, open to corruption - Operation Countryman 1978-84
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was policing like in the 1980s where there was a re-invention of the wheel of community policing?

A
  • need to re-connect with communities, police no longer talk with the public unless investigating crime
  • did it work? research said it didn’t reduce crime
  • other objectives may have been reached - partnership with community
  • public involvement in policing
  • police are still re-active, investigating everything
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was policing like in the 1990s where Problem Orientated Policing (POP) was introduced?

A
  • community-based
  • low-level issues
  • recognition of the need for info to solve problems
  • began to use data and analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is P.O.P (Problem Orientated Policing) and why did it never really take off?

A

POP is about identifying/solving underlying problems with communities, rather than simply responding to just individual incidents. Where the police, communities, and local agencies work together to identify specific problems that cause incidents/tackle them together - Home Office

  • approach saw the intro of analysts (limited) and P.O.P teams. Generated a working partnership
  • focused on low-level issues
  • reduction/prevention approach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the S.A.R.A. model?

A

Systematic model - common sense approach
1. Scanning
2. Analysis
3. Response
4. Assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What’s involved in the scanning process?

A
  • Identifying recurring problems of concern to the public/police
  • Identifying the consequences of the problem for the community/police
  • Prioritizing those problems
  • Developing broad goals
  • Confirming problems exist
  • Determining how frequently the problem occurs/how long it has been occurring
  • Selecting problems for closer examination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What’s involved in the analysis process?

A
  • Identifying/understanding events and conditions that precede/accompany the problem
  • Identifying relevant data to be collected
  • Researching what’s known about the problem type
  • Taking inventory of how the problem is currently addressed and the strengths/limitations of the current response
  • Narrowing the scope of the problem as specifically as possible
  • Identifying a variety of resources that may be of assistance in developing a deeper understanding of the problem
  • Developing a working hypothesis about why the problem is occurring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What’s involved in the response process?

A
  • Brainstorming for new interventions
  • Searching for what other communities with similar problems have done
  • Choosing among alternative interventions
  • Outlining response plan and identifying responsible parties
  • Stating specific objectives for the response plan
  • Carrying out planned activities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What’s involved in the assessment process?

A
  • Determining whether the plan was implemented - process evaluation
  • Collecting pre- and post-response qualitative/quantitative data
  • Determining whether broad goals and specific objectives were attained
  • Identifying any new strategies needed to carry out original plan
  • Conducting ongoing assessments to ensure continued affectiveness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was 1990’s P.O.P?

A

Problem-orientated policing has been instrumental in educating a generation of police leaders in the importance of analysis as a foundation for decision-making - Ratcliffe - Intelligence-Led Policing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the natural progression from P.O.P. to intelligence-led policing?

A
  • Contains many key drivers from P.O.P. i.e. Deal with emerging problems rather than react later
  • Contains elements of S.A.R.A
  • Legislation/guidance during the 1990’s around intelligence (source) handling (Criminal Procedure & Investigations Act 1995, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the evolution of the NIM

A

P.O.P
- Could be developed further
- Model for operation tactics emphasizing intelligence use

Kent Police change of policing style
- Moved resources away from reactive policing
- Promoted intelligence use and gathering

Developed into the National Intelligence Model (NIM)
- Broader outlook
- Tries to encompass all policing responsibilities
- Talks of ‘Policing Business’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Where are we now?

A

NIM - National Intelligence Model
- UK response to a more global wave of intelligence-led policing philosophy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the N.I.M?

A

Business model to ensure:
- Targeted policing led by the development of information/intelligence
- Used to prioritize issues/resource deployment

Paradigm in policing away from reactive methods of the past:
- Developed by N.C.I.S
- Adopted by ACPO in 2000
- Police Reform agenda
- Standard by 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How does N.I.M work?

A

Information flow between levels
- 3 levels
- 2&3 require additional specialist resources: Financial investigation, Communication analysis, Surveillance, TP/UC officers
- Specialist resources must be available to L1

20
Q

What is NIM Level 1?

A

Deals with crime, incidents, and neighborhood priorities occurring at a local level. E.G. local level dwelling burglar.

21
Q

What is NIM Level 2?

A

Deals with cross-border issues affecting more than one BCU, Neighbouring forces, or regional crime activity. E.G. Reciever of stolen goods operating across boundaries

22
Q

What is NIM Level 3?

A

Deals with serious and organized crime which operates on a national/international scale. E.G. Organised crime group receiving property (cars) from L2 and exporting to Europe

23
Q

What is intelligence?

A

‘Provides techniques for improving the basis of knowledge. As with other techniques, it can be a dangerous tool if its limitations aren’t recognized by those who seek to use it - Review of intelligence on weapons of mass destruction, House of Commons Paper 98 p14 2004
- Police work is impossible without info
- what, where, when, why, who, how
- Processing info creates intelligence and that intelligence creates knowledge but not necessarily all the knowledge that’s needed.

24
Q

How is info processed?

A

Raw info in -> processing -> intelligence out -> creates knowledge §

25
What are the 3 generic uses of intelligence?
1. Structure - existence of an intelligence dept/unit within an organizational framework 2. Process - a continuous cycle of tasking, collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination 3. Product - output of intelligence process, i.e. subject profile/tactical assessment
26
What is the intelligence cycle as given by Radcliffe?
- direction - collation - analysis - dissemination - feedback/review
27
What processes are used in the Police analyst training course Newburn et al?
- collection - evaluation - collation/development - analysis - dissemination
28
What are strategic assessments?
Gives an overview of current/long-term issues affecting or likely to affect a force or basic command unit. - about the future - deals with topics and not offender/victim collection plan is essential as strategic analysis isn't focused on 1 problem -> about gathering info from which you can make topic-based references - about will it get worse and what will happen if we do nothing or keep on doing what we already do?
29
What are strategic assessments for?
To draw inferences/make recommendations for prevention, intelligence, enforcement and reassurance priorities, and future policing strategy
30
What does intelligence-led policing state about strategic analysis?
- Strategic is a fluid term within the analysis - requires a knowledge of more qualitative techniques such as future wheels, competing hypothesis, force field analysis, morphological analysis, Ishikawa diagrams, PESTEL, SWOT, Delphi analysis and scenario generation
31
What are tactical assessments?
- define problems/identify subjects - recommend tactical options - review intelligence requirements - review recent performance/actions set at previous meetings - identifying emerging patterns/trends
32
What are subject profiles?
- prioritization - intelligence gaps - prevention - enforcement opportunities
33
What are problem profiles?
- crime trends - hotspots - identification of suspects/victims
34
Why do we need to understand crime?
Importance of 'place' - 'Almost everything that happens, happens somewhere. Knowing where something happens is critically important.' (Longley et al, 2001)
35
What are the 4 dimensions of crime?
1. Legal (law must be broken) - spatial (country/area) 2. Victim (targeted) - spatial (location) 3. Offender (commit the crime) - spatial (location) 4. Spatial (has to occur in a place - space/time) - spatial
36
What do we ask when a crime occurs?
- why there? - where did the offender come from? - where did they go? - what about the victim? - how do you get there? - why do you go there? The place is vital in understanding crime/how it can be tackled. To fully understand what's occurred, we must learn about the spatial aspects of the crime.
37
What is the development of crime mapping?
France - 1829 Andre-Michel Guerry (1802-1866) and Andriano Balbi (1782-1884) Henry Mayhew - 1861 Map of the intensity of criminality - number of offenders per 10,000 population (dark areas > average, light>average) crime vs education: first comparative choropleth thematic maps, showing crimes against persons and crimes against property to the level of instruction by departments in France.
38
What did Charles Booth invent?
London Poverty maps 1889-99
39
What is the Chicago school model - 1920s?
Shaw and McKay - 1929 - identified certain areas of Chicago were 'delinquent areas' - spatial patterns in metropolitan areas persisted - studies showed temporal (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, seasonal) trends in crime - patterns of crime weren't related to social/economic conditions
40
What is the Concentric Zone Model?
1. Central Buisness District 2. Transitional zone - recent immigrant groups - deteriorated housing - factories - abandoned buildings 3. Working class zone - Single-family tenements 4. Residential zone - Single-family homes - yards/garages 5. Commuter zone - suburbs
41
Can mapping crime help?
- GIS developed in 1960/70s - Police forces/military began to use digital mapping systems rather than paper maps in control rooms - application of digital mapping rapidly taken up - GIS use developed planning, transport networks, etc, and geography - GIS used in mapping crime, aided by technological advances - crime concentrated in areas of activity - red areas on the map
42
Why does crime cluster geographically and temporarily?
- routine activity theory - crime pattern theory -> least effort principle - others
43
What is routine activity theory?
- developed by Cohen and Felson - 1979 - based on general volume crime/serious crime (murder, rape) - concluded that most crime was closely linked to people's routine activities and was opportunistic, rather than planned/executed
44
What 3 factors converge in space/time when criminal action occurs - a crime triangle?
1. motivated offenders (criminal) 2. suitable targets (victims) 3. absence of capable guardians (police)
45
What are the features of routine activity theory?
- includes social explanations of crime (social structures can account fort for routine activities) - routine activities can create convergence in space/time (providing opportunities) - can help explain differences in crime rates between areas (retired people, young people) - crime rates can be predicted by number of opportunities for crime, not number of offenders - theory doesn't focus on an offender or their motivations, only on activity mechanics
46
What is the crime pattern theory?
- developed by Brantingham and Brantingham - based on the 'lease effort principle' - people exert minimal effort for tasks - offenders tend to travel short distances to commit crime - develop/ use mental maps as we move through space (home/work) - mental maps personal to us - different people have different knowledge/boundaries - prefer to do what keeps us safe, using risk assessment - tend to feel most comfortable in familiar places - offender behavior predicted by personal activity spaces - traced between certain nodes (home/work). Nodes linked by routine paths. - creatures of spatial habit, offenders commit offenses around these nodes and along paths taken before - behavior limited to mental maps, search areas may expand over time as they explore new areas - offenders place mental 'BUFFER ZONES' around their home address - the zone where they may be recognized so warier of committing a crime
47
What can we conclude here?
- crimes committed by offenders looking for opportunities in their daily routines, and look for opportunities in areas dependant on their mental maps and assess risks dependent on these - crime doesn't occur randomly in space and we have theories that help work out why it happens where it does - offenders create spatial patterns when they offend and these patterns help us work out who they are, where they live, and where they offend in the future this info leads to intelligence - L1-3 depending on local, national, and beyond. There's the development of strategic/tactical assessments.,