Intelligence Project Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

Threshold Hypothesis

A

Specific to creativity, a certain level of intelligence is necessary but not sufficient for creativity, no correlation at high levels. Evidence is mixed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Perfect pitch

A

Thought to be a 1 in 10,000 occurrence, it is more common in people speaking tonal languages and was taught to every one of the children in a 1.5 year study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Growth mindset

A

Belief that intelligence can be changed through effort. Evidence that this can be changed is weak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Grit

A

Ability to persevere in the face of challenges. Evidence that this can be changed is weak.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Preterm births

A

Lead to lower scores on cognitive tests, math tests, reading tests, behavior assessments, motor control, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Some examples of human progress

A

Marathon record dropped by 30%, Olympic dives recommended banned now competed by 10 year olds, Steve Faloon’s memory feats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Constrained vs unconstrained skills

A

Constrained are finite - letters of the alphabet, basic letter-sound correspondence. Unconstrained is stuff like knowledge. Unconstrained more correlated with outside variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Flynn Effect

A

The gradual but substantial and long-sustained increase in IQ scores over time across the world. Some evidence of reversal in northern Europe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

g-loading

A

How much a particular skill is correlated with the hypothetical general intelligence g

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Deliberate practice

A

Explains from 0% to 26% of variability in Macnamara et al meta-analysis, higher values for more predictable domains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Polygenic index vs college completion

A

Similar explanatory power to family income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

GWAS

A

Genome-wide association study, used to create a polygenic index

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Polygenic index percent of outcomes explained

A

Typically 10-15%, a bit more than income-higher education, a bit less than height-weight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rough heritability of intelligence as measured by IQ (Ritchie)

A

50%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Counterfactual: why genetic causal claims can be confusing

A

If a society refused to send redheads to school, genes for red hair would seem to be associated with educational outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Positive manifold

A

Broad trend that different measures of cognitive ability tend to be highly correlated, seen as evidence of underlying g

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Fluid vs crystallized intelligence

A

Fluid more connected to reasoning and working memory, more correlated with intelligence, doesn’t change much. Crystallized more connected to knowledge and long-term memory, grows over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Matthew Effect

A

Those who start with an advantage accumulate more advantage over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Flynn Effect differential

A

The gains are largely due to increases at the bottom of the spectrum

20
Q

Genetic effects on differences measured at age 10 months

21
Q

Heritability of executive function

22
Q

Outcome of chess instruction

A

Kids get better at chess, null on academic and non-cognitive outcomes

23
Q

Percent of variance in learning attributable to teachers/schools (Detterman)

24
Q

Average effect size in education RCTs, Dietrichson

25
Summary of pre-k research (DeBoer)
Mixed bag, more recent and randomized studies show much smaller (sometimes negative) effects
26
Throughout childhood, genetic influences on cognitive ability
Increase
27
Male/female differences in polygenic predictions of educational attainment historically
Increased access to education increased genetic inequality
28
Examples of interventions that narrow genetic inequality
Association between genetics and obesity reduced, association between genetics and alcoholism eliminate, association between genetics and math courses taken reduced
29
Raven's matrices and working memory
When under time pressure, working memory and fluid reasoning are the same. They diverge a bit without time pressure
30
Fluid intelligence vs crystallized intelligence
Fluid is more correlated with g and seems to be mostly working memory + processing speed. Crystallized is more about long-term memory.
31
Executive function interventions
Rarely show results in follow-up assessment
32
Executive function is maybe just (Loffler)
Processing speed
33
Polygenic score/learning rate effect (Youn et al, Harden)
Practice seems to narrow genetic effects
34
Cognitive components of athletics
Pattern recognition in volleyball/baseball accounts for much of skill differences, baseball players can't hit a softball pitch
35
Ackerman's study
Air traffic control simulation, larger ability correlations in the arrivals condition, individual differences increase with practice in that condition (?)
36
Modern evidence that practice widens gaps
Zerr et al, Lithuanian words study. Lots of potential confounders but still really interesting.
37
Three Laws of Behavioral Genetics (Turkheimer)
All behavioral traits are heritable, effect of genes is larger than the effect of family, most variation is stuff besides genes and families
38
Flynn Effect fluid vs crystallized
No effect on processing speed - seems like it's more about crystallized knowledge
39
Positive manifold or negative manifold?
The positive manifold increases with lower IQ, and increases as children age (Gusev)
40
g-loading is highest on
Culturally loaded subtests (Kan et al 2013)
41
SES-IQ association
None at 10 months, gradually grows stronger over time (Gusev)
42
Mutualist model of intelligence
Data suggests a bidirectional feedback loop between fluid and crystallized intelligence, for instance matrix reasoning and vocabulary
43
Most g-loaded IQ subtests
Most culturally loaded, i.e. vocabulary, knowledge
44
A million little nudges evidence
Things like preschool fade, but adoption matters a ton. No neurological basis for intelligence. Cultural loadings for g. EEA violation for twin studies.
45
Quincunx model for missing heritability
If i.e. divorce is a bin in a quincunx, a pin can have a bias towards that bin but still produce nothing in a GWAS because the system is so complex
46
Adoption studies
Not a strong correlation between adopter IQ and adoptee IQ, but a large increase in adoptee IQ