Intentional Interferences With The Person Flashcards

(10 cards)

1
Q

Battery

A

The intentional and direct application of physical force to another person.

-Doesn’t matter if injury was not intended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assault

A

An intentional act that causes a person to reasonably apprehend that a battery is about to be inflicted upon them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Tuberville V Savage 1669

A

“If it were not assize-time, I would not take such language from you”

Claim failed because there was no threat of a battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Ireland 1996

A

Made a number of telephone calls to three women but said nothing. Women suffered from anxiety, inability to sleep, difficulty breathing, skin conditions etc.

“Bodily harm in S47 can be interpreted to include a recognisable psychiatric illness”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

False imprisonment

A

The intentional confinement of a person against their will.

Confinement may be physical force as well as conduct or even threatening words as long as words would be sufficient to restrain a reasonable person.

Only when there are no means of escape.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Nervous shock

A

Recoverable in the absence of battery, assault and false imprisonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Wilkinson V Downton 1897

A

Mrs wilkinson received a call saying her husband had broken both his legs. Caused nervous shock, vomiting and serious physical consequences for weeks.

Must be an outrageous act including hurtful words that was reasonably likely to cause psychological harm and that actually caused the harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Harassment Act

A

A person must not pursue a course of conduct which amounts to harassment of another and which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

Includes alarming the person or causing them distress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Privacy

Breach of confidence

A

Did claimant have a reasonable expectation of privacy?

Does claimants interest in privacy outweigh the defendants interest in freedom of expression?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Campbell V Mirror Group Newspapers 2004

A

Daily mirror published-

  1. Seeking treatment for drug addiction
  2. Photo of her leaving NA meeting
  3. Details of possible treatment

Claim for breach established:
No for 1. Precious denials created inaccurate image
Yes for 2. People might recognise centre
Yes for 3. Medical information should be confidential.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly