Intentional Torts Flashcards

(65 cards)

1
Q

What are the prima facie elements of an intentional tort?

A

1) Voluntary act;
2) Intent to cause harm;
3) Causation; and
4) Resulting harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What intent is needed for intentional torts?

A
  • Intent to cause a harmful result; or
  • Acting with knowledge that harm is substantially certain to result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Are children and the mentally incompetent liable for their own torts?

A

Yes, if they have the intent (knowledge) required for the tort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Doctrine of transferred intent

A

If D intends to commit a tort but causes injury to a different victim OR commits a different tort than intended, original intent is transferred to the new victim/tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Transferred intent applies to which torts?

A
  • Assault;
  • Battery;
  • False imprisonment; and
  • Trespass to chattels or land
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Elements of battery

A

Intentional act;
That causes harmful, unwanted, or offensive contact to the plaintiff’s person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Are actual damages required for battery?

A

No, actual damages are not required. Without actual damages, the plaintiff can recover nominal and if defendant acted with malice, punitive damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What qualifies as contact for battery?

A

Touching either:

  • P’s body;
  • Something that has a close physical connection to P’s body (purse, pet on a leash); or
  • Creating circumstances that will harm P (e.g. putting water on stairs so P will fall)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What constitutes harmful or offensive contact for battery?

A

Contact that:

  • Causes injury, pain, or any physical discomfort to P
  • Offends a reasonable person’s sensibilities

Remember it’s based on a reasonable person standard
There is an implied consent for ordinary contacts (e.g., bumping into people on subway)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does P need to be aware of the contact to constitute battery?

A

No, only that the contact would be offensive to a reasonable person & D had the intent to cause the contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does P need to prove harm for battery?

A

No, only that the contact would be offensive to a reasonable person & D had the intent to cause the contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the defenses to battery?

A

1) Consent;
2) Self-defense;
3) Defense of property; and
4) Defense of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define

Eggshell plaintiff rule

A

D will be liable for all injuries/damages to P even if injuries are not reasonably foreseeable (i.e. you take P as you found them, even if P is more susceptible to harm)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Elements of assault

A

1) Intentional act by D that creates;
2) P’s reasonable apprehension;
3) Of imminent harmful or offensive physical contact; and
4) Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What constitutes reasonable apprehension for assault?

A

P is aware of D’s act; and
Reasonably apprehends imminent harmful or offensive contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Can reasonable apprehension exist if the D lacks the ability to commit assault?

A

Yes, as long as P didn’t know D lacked the ability. If P knew that D lacked the ability, then no reasonable apprehension would exist.

(Ex. If D says “I’m going to kill you with this gun in my bag,” but doesn’t actually have a gun, there is still reasonable apprehension unless the plaintiff knows D doesn’t have a gun in the bag)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Are mere words sufficient for assault?

A

No, unless in conjunction with other threatening conduct or circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Are threats of future harm considered assault?

A

No, the P must fear immediate bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Elements of false imprisonment

A

1) D intends to confine or restrain P in a bounded area (area where P has no reasonable means of escape);
2) D actually confines or restrains P in bounded area;
3) P knows or is harmed by confinement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What constitutes confinement for false imprisonment?

A

Freedom of movement in all directions is limited with no reasonable means of escape.

Examples:
* Use of physical barriers, duress, or threats
* Invalid use of legal authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Do threats of future or moral harm constitute confinement?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Does failing to release from confinement constitute false imprisonment?

A

Yes
(e.g. P gets trapped in the bathroom and D won’t let her out)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Define

shopkeeper’s privilege

A

A shopkeeper is not liable for false imprisonment if she:

1) Has a reasonable suspicion that P has stolen goods;
2) Uses reasonable force to detain P; and
3) Only detains P for a reasonable time to confirm/deny the suspicion
⚠️ Note: Only non-deadly force allowed. Shopkeeper can be liable for P’s injuries if actions exceed scope of privilege .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

How long does D need to confine P to constitute false imprisonment?

A

Only briefly; duration is only important to determine damages

There is no specific duration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Can you negligently falsely imprison someone?
No, false imprisonment requires the intent to confine
26
When is proof of actual damages required to recover for false imprisonment?
Only if P was unaware of his confinement. Proof of actual damages is not required if P was aware.
27
# Define false arrest
False assertion of legal authority. Form of false imprisonment.
28
Elements of IIED
1) D acts intentionally or recklessly; 2) With extreme and outrageous conduct; and 3) Causes P severe emotional distress 4) Actual damages are reguired
29
What constitutes extreme and outrageous conduct?
Conducts that exceeds all bounds tolerated by a civilized society. Must be much more than mere threats & insults; must shock the conscience.
30
Is non-outrageous conduct actionable under IIED?
No, unless: * D is an innkeeper, common carrier, or in position of authority (teacher, boss, etc); or * P is part of a particularly susceptible group (seniors, children, pregnant women, etc)
31
What factors are considered when determing if conduct isextreme or outrageous?
1) **Pattern of Conduct**- continuous and repetitive conduct 2) Defendant owed victim **fiduciary duty**: Employer-Employee, Doctor-Patient 3) **Common Carrier or Inn Keeper** = High courtesy to customers 4) **Use racial epithtest & homophobia** 5) **Vulnerable victims**- young children, elderly, pregnant women, victims with phobias
32
What is considered severe emotional distress?
Level of emotional distress that is expected to adversely affect mental health. Substantial & lasting.
33
Are insults, indignities, threats, annoyands, petty oppressions or trivialities Extreme and Outrageous Conduct
No
34
What is the only intentional tort that requires **actual damages**
IIED
35
What elements are needed for a **bystander** to recover for IIED?
1) D **intentionally** or **recklessly** harmed a third party; P was **present** at the scene and **witnessed** the event; P was **closely related** to victim (i.e. immediate family); D **knew** P was present and closely related; and P suffers **extreme emotional distress** as a result ⚠️ Note: P does not need to prove the above elements if D’s **design or purpose** was to cause severe emotional distress to P
36
Elements of **trespass to land**
1) D **intentionally**; 2) **Physically invades** P’s real property
37
What constitutes **intent** for trespass to land?
**Intent to enter the land;** D doesn’t need to intend to interfere with P’s property
38
What constitutes entry for trespass to land?
* **Physical invasioon** by D * **Object thrown/controlled** by D ⚠️ Note: Smells, lights, sounds do not constitute trespass (but may be nuisance)
39
Is mistake a defense to trespass to land?
No
40
Elements for trespass to chattel
1) D **intentionally**; **2) Intermeddles or uses**; 3) P’s **personal property** (chattel); and 4) Causes **damage or loss of use**
41
# Define conversion
D intentionally exercises dominion and control over P’s property so as to deprive them of its use
42
Is mistake a defense to conversion?
No
43
Differentiate trespass to chattels vs. conversion
Trespass to chattels: * **Shorter in duration** with **less severe harm** than conversion * Can only recover **cost of repair or rental value** Conversion: * **Significant interference** that deprives P of use * P can recover the **full value + replevin**
44
What are the defenses to intentional torts?
* Consent (express & implied); * Self-defense; * Defense of others; * Defense of property; * Necessity; and * Recapture
45
What is express consent? When is it negated?
When P affirmatively communicates permission for D to act through words or writing. Consent is negated when: * D’s conduct **exceeds the scope** of consent; * P **lacked capacity** to consent; or * Consent was gained through **duress or fraud**
46
What is implied consent? When is it negated?
**Reasonable** inference that P consents through her conduct or custom (e.g. participating in boxing match) Negated when conduct reasonably **exceeds the scope of consent.**
47
If consent is given by mistake, is it still a valid defense?
Yes, unless: * D **knows** that P is mistaken and **exploits** it; * or D is **responsible** for the mistake
48
Elements for **self-defense**
D **subjectively and reasonably** believes harm is **imminent**; and D uses **proportional force** to protect herself
49
When can **deadly force** be used for self-defense?
1. D **subjectively and reasonably** believes harm is **imminent**; and 2. D uses **proportional force** to protect himself
50
Is there a duty to retreat?
Generally no, unless in a retreat jurisdiction (e.g. Washington, DC)
51
When can the initial aggressor claim self-defense?
Only if the other person responded to non-deadly force with deadly force.
52
Is a D allowed to act negligently while using self-defense?
No, a D will be held liable if they harm bystanders by acting negligently during self-defense (e.g. shooting a gun into a crowded sidewalk)
53
What is the defense of others defense?
Defendant is entitled to defend others as long as they have a reasonable belief that the person they are defendingwould be entitled to self-defense
54
If D mistakenly believes that she or another is in danger, can she still invoke self-defense or defense of others as a defense?
Yes, as long as the mistake was reasonable
55
What is defense of property?
D is permitted to use reasonable, non-deadly force to prevent P from causing harm to D’s personal or real property
56
What must D do before using reasonable force to defend property?
Ask the trespasser to stop ⚠️ Note: Not required if D believes request is dangerous or useless
57
What is recapture of chattels?
Privilege to **trespass** & use **peaceful means** to get back one’s personal property from the wrongdoer
58
When can force be used to recapture chattels?
Only when in hot pursuit of person who has obtained possession wrongfully (i.e. tort is in progress) ⚠️ Note: Deadly force is not allowed
59
Do parents have the right to discipline their children?
Yes, parents and educators may use reasonable force to discipline children (reasonableness depends on child’s age and proportionality to the misbehavior)
60
What is the** necessity defense**?
Allows D to **reasonably interefere** with P’s property to **avoid** a substantially **greater harm** (e.g. D damages P’s fence to try and save P’s burning house)
61
What is the **public necessity** defense?
D destroyed or interfered with private property to **protect the public from severe, imminent disaster**
62
Is public necessity an absolute defense?
Yes, D is not liable for any damages to the property
63
When does private necessity arise?
When D interferes or trespasses on P’s property to prevent **personal harm** or **harm to a small number** of people
64
Is private necessity an absolute privilege?
No, property owner can still recover actual damages for harm done to the property (but not nominal or punitive damages)
65
True or False **Intentionally wrongful actions** render D liable for all consequences of those acts, even if **unintended and unforeseen**
True