Intentional Torts Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

What are the three elements required for every intentional tort?

A

The 3 elements of every intentional tort are:

  1. intent;
  2. an affirmative act; AND
  3. causation

TIP: each tort claim has its own unique elements but these three are for all intentional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the legal standard for establishing the intent to harm?

A

Whether the ∆ had the intent to harm in tort law is measured by whether they acted with the desire to cause the touching or believed that a touching was substantially certain to result from their act

TIP: everyone is capable of intent **even children and mentally incompetent are liable for intentional torts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is intent in tort law measured subjectively or objectively?

A

SUBJECTIVELY (whether the ∆ intended to cause the harm is based on their subjective mindset when they acted

TIP: basic Q is not what a reasonable person would have desired/believed, but what the particular ∆ in fact desired/believed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Transferred Intent

A

MAY ONLY be invoked if both the tort that occurred and the tort that was intended are one of the following:
-assault
-battery
-false imprisonment
-trespass to land
-trespass to chattels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4 Elements of Battery

A

Four Elements are:

  1. intent
  2. an affirmative act by the ∆
  3. harmful or offensive touching to the π’s person; AND
  4. causation

TIP: π must also prove they did NOT CONSENT to the battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is the “harmful or offensive contact” element of a battery satisfied?

A

Either “harmful” or “offensive” touching suffices to support a battery claim:

  1. “harmful” - if it injures, disfigures, impairs, or causes pain to any bodily organ or function
  2. “offensive” if it would offend a reasonable person’s sense of personal dignity

TIP: implied consent applies to battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 4 elements of assault?

A

4 elements are:

  1. intent
  2. an affirmative act by the ∆
  3. apprehension of imminent harmful/offensive contact by π AND
  4. causation

TIP: mere fear, intimidation, or threats are NOT sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 4 elements of false imprisonment?

A
  1. intent to confine
  2. an affirmative act
  3. confinement AND
  4. causation

TIP: the π must be aware of their confinement to constitute false imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the legal standard for “confinement” under false imprisonment?

A

A ∆’s INTENTIONAL act must result in the confinement of the π:

  1. w/in boundaries fixed by ∆
  2. for some period of time
  3. even if for a short period of time
  4. restricted to a limited area AND
  5. without the knowledge of a reasonable means of escape

TIP: future threats of imprisonment are insufficient to constitute confinement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a “bounded area” in the context of false imprisonment?

A

a specific area in which the π is completely confined by the ∆’s acts

TIP: there is no confinement if reasonable means of escape are available and known to the π

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the 4 elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress?

A
  1. intent
  2. extreme and outrageous conduct by ∆
  3. causation AND
  4. severe emotional distress

TIP: whether the ∆’s conduct is sufficiently outrageous enough to cause mental anguish will be a fact-based determination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the legal standard for establishing “extreme and outrageous conduct”?

A

are words or conduct that exceed “all bounds of decent behavior

TIP: in determining whether conduct is extreme and outrageous, courts will consider the “totality of the circumstances” not each isolated individual incident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

When may a bystander (3rd party) recover under intentional infliction of emotional distress?

A

A ∆ is liable for IIED for conduct directed at members of the π’s family, if the plaintiff/bystander was present AND ∆ knew of the plaintiff/bystander’s presence

TIP: π need not be present to hold the ∆ liable if they can establish that the ∆’s actions against 3rd party were part of the ∆’s design or purpose to cause the π severe distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 4 elements of trespass to land?

A
  1. intent
  2. act by the ∆
  3. intrusion upon the π’s land AND
  4. causation

TIP: actual damages are usually not required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the 5 elements of trespass to chattels?

A
  1. intent
  2. act by the ∆
  3. invasion of the π’s chattel interest
  4. causation AND
  5. damages

TIP: there must be actual damage/dispossession to sue for trespass to chattels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 4 elements of conversion?

A
  1. intent
  2. act by the ∆
  3. substantial invasion of the π’s chattel interest AND
  4. causation

TIP: the diff between trespass to chattels and conversion is that conversion requires a more serious intermeddling of the π’s property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the 5 available defenses for intentional tort claims?

A
  1. consent
  2. self-defense
  3. defense of third persons
  4. defense of land/chattels
  5. privilege
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

When may a π use self-defense to protect themselves from intentional torts?

A

A ∆ is privileged to use force when they have a reasonable apprehension of bodily contact and the amount of force they use does not exceed what is reasonably necessary to prevent the harm

TIP: deadly force may be used if the ∆ reasonably believed the attacker was about to inflict death or serious bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

When may a ∆ validly defend their land or chattels w/ force?

A

∆ privileged to use force when a π intrudes w/out privilege and the ∆ reasonably believes force is necessary to terminate the π’s intrusion, as long as the force is not likely to cause death/serious bodily harm

TIP: ∆’s may NOT use deadly force to defend land/chattels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the defense of “necessity”?

A

a ∆ may interfere w/ the real or personal property of another if it is reasonably necessary to avoid a substantially greater harm to the public, to themself, or to their property

TIP: for example, averting public disaster gives a ∆ a complete privilege to enter land if it was reasonably necessary to avoid the disaster

21
Q

Must a battery cause physical contact between the ∆ and the π’s body?

A

NO.

Battery requires the harmful or offensive touching of the π’s person OR something so closely associated w/ the π as to make the touching tantamount to a physical invasion of the π’s person

TIP: for example - things “closely associated” w/ the π’s person would include a situation where the ∆ knocks the π’s hat off their head or grabs a plate out of their hands

22
Q

Must a π be aware of the offensive contact to have a claim for battery?

23
Q

Must the π be aware of ∆’s imminent act to recover for assault?

A

YES

TIP: distinguish from battery, which does NOT require the π to be aware of ∆’s act

24
Q

What are the three types of arrest privileges in tort law?

A
  1. arrests for felonies w/out an arrest warrant
  2. arrests for misdemeanors w/out an arrest warrant
  3. arrests under a warrant
25
What are the 4 elements of malicious prosecution?
1. instigation of the criminal proceedings by police or other government officials; 2. proceedings terminated in favor of the π; 3. lack of probable cause; AND 4. improper purpose
26
Which 2 types of damages are recoverable under a claim for IIED?
1. compensatory 2. punitive TIP: the π must have experienced ACTUAL, non-nominal damages to recover
27
What is a "physical invasion onto a π's land" in tort law?
a ∆'s intrusion may be by personal entry onto the π's land or by causing some third person or thing to enter (e.g., obstructing a stream so that water flows onto a neighbor's land) TIP: a court could also find an intrusion if the ∆ fails either to leave the land, or to remove property therefrom, after permission to remain has expired
28
Who may bring an action for trespass to land?
The person actually in possession (ie landowner) may bring an action for trespass, because any possession is considered legal possession against a trespasser TIP: even a wrongful occupier (eg, adverse possessor) may maintain a trespass action against a wrongful intruder
29
Which 8 uses of chattel amount to "substantial interference" with chattel interest?
1. substantial dispossession - of the chattel (eg, prevents access to the chattel w/out the possessor's consent 2. destruction - of the chattel 3. material alteration - of the chattel 4. unauthorized use - of the chattel - by a bailee 5. buying or receiving stolen property, even in good faith, where ∆ had intended to acquire ownership rights 6. selling or disposing of stolen property 7. misdelivering - the chattel (even if mistakenly); AND/OR 8. refusal to return chattel upon proper demand TIP: distinguish from trespass to chattels
30
What are the 2 ways a π may consent to intentionally tortious behavior?
1. express AND 2. implied (by π or by law)
31
What are 3 scenarios where EXPRESS consent is NOT a valid defense to an intentional tort?
Express consent is NOT a valid defense when: 1. it was given under duress (threat of imminent action); 2. it was induced by fraud that goes to an essential matter; OR 3. the π consented by mistake, and the ∆ either caused the mistake or knows of it and takes advantage of the situation
32
What are the 2 types of implied consent?
1. implication from the π's conduct or customs, such that a reasonable person would infer consent; AND/OR 2. implication by law
33
When may a person validly enter another person's land to recover their chattel?
A person may validly enter another person's land to recover their chattel under the following circumstances: -if the chattel is on the wrongdoer's property, the chattel owner may enter at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner to reclaim; OR -if the chattel is on an innocent 3rd party's property, the chattel owner may enter at reasonable time and in peaceful manner if the property owner has notice and refuses to return the chattel; BUT -if the chattel is on another's property BECAUSE of the chattel owner's fault, the chattel owner has no privilege to enter any may only recover through legal process
34
Define the defense of consent to intentional torts
Even though ∆ has otherwise committed an intentional tort, the ∆ is not liable if the π consented to the act that constituted the tort -this defense arises through express consent, by implication or as a matter of law TIP: the ∆ must NOT exceed the scope of consent
35
To which of the intentional torts is consent most often a defense?
1. assault 2. battery 3. false imprisonment
36
What is the defense of privilege
conduct that would subject the ∆ to liability but is excused under the circumstances includes: -necessity -self-defense -defense of others
37
Define defense of others
entitles a ∆ to defend another person from an attack by the π to the same extent that the 3rd person would be lawfully entitled to defend themself from the π
38
Define defense of property
allows the defendant to use reasonable force to prevent the π from committing a tort against the ∆'s property
39
What is the "shopkeeper's privilege"?
A shopkeeper may temporarily detain a person reasonably suspected of theft in or near their store for the purpose of an investigation
40
Which intentional tort is the shopkeeper's privilege most often a defense?
false imprisonment
41
Self-defense
∆'s actions are viewed under a reasonable person standard
42
What is the mental state required for trespass to chattels?
the ∆ intentionally performs the physical act that interferes w/ π's chattel - ∆ may be liable even though they did not intend or recognize the legal significance of their act TIP: mistake is NOT a viable defense to a trespass to chattels action
43
What intentional torts can transferred intent apply to?
Can apply to: -assault -battery -false imprisonment -trespass to land -trespass to chattels
44
What is the π's level of distress that is required for IIED?
π must prove that the distress suffered was severe, more than the level of mental distress a reasonable person could be expected to endure the emotional distress must be substantial, not trivial or transitory TIP: the more outrageous the ∆'s conduct, the easier it will be for π to establish the requisite mental injury
45
define assault
the π must show that the intentionally caused the π to be placed in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact The π must be aware of the act and believe with reasonable certainty that the ∆ is able to commit it
46
Is there a durational requirement for a π to prove false imprisonment?
NO - a very brief confinement is sufficient to establish false imprisonment TIP: the duration may be taken into consideration when awarding damages
47
What is the mental state required for trespass to land?
the ∆ need only act w/ the intent to cause a physical invasion of π's land actual intent to trespass is NOT required TIP: mistake is NOT a viable defense to trespass to land action
48
Is proof of damage required to recover under trespass to chattels?
YES - the π must show proof of actual damages to recover
49
Define recapture of chattels
recapture of chattels occurs when a ∆ may peacefully recover possession of a chattel that was taken unlawfully