Intentional Torts Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

What are the three main elements of ALL intentional torts?

A
  1. An (volitional) act by D
  2. Intent by D
  3. Causation of the result to P from D’s act
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

For intentional torts, is the hypersensitivity of P considered?

A

No. It is a reasonable person standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is incapacity a defense for intentional torts?

A

No, even young children who are mentally competent are liable for their intentional torts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What intent is required for intentional torts?

A

The intent to bring about the forbidden consequences that are the basis of the tort

NOT the intent to cause the specific injury that results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the doctrine of transferred intent?

A

The transferred intent doctrine applies when Dintends to commit a tort against one person but instead:

  • Commits a different tort against that person
  • Commits the same tort as intended but against a different person OR
  • Commits a different tort against a different person

intent to commit a certain tort against one person is transferred to the tort actually committed or to the person actually injured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Transferred intent can only be invoked if both the intended and transferred tort are one of the following five torts:

A
  1. Assault
  2. Battery
  3. False Imprisonment
  4. Trespass to Land
  5. Trespass to Chattels
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do we determine causation for intentional torts

A

Causation is satisfied if the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the elements of battery?

A
  1. An act by D which brings about harmful or offensive contact to P’s person;

2) D’s Intent to bring about harmful or offensive contact to the P’s person; and

3) Causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What constitutes harmful or offensive touching?

A

Harmful = causes actual injury, pain, or disfigurement

Offensive = would it be offensive to a reasonably person? / unconsented-to contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does contact need to be direct for battery purposes?

A

No.

Contact can be directly to P’s person (includes anything connected to person)

Contact can be indirect (e.g., poisoning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the elements of assault?

A

1) An act by D creating a reasonable apprehension in P of immediate harmful or offensive contact to P’s person;

2) D’s intent to bring about in the P’s apprehension of immediate harmful or offensive contact with the P’s person; and

3) Causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is apprehension determined for assault?

Is fear required?

Is knowledge of the threat of the act required?

Does it matter if D cannot actually commit the battery?

A

Apprehension of harmful or offensive contact must be REASONABLE

No, fear is not required

Yes, knowledge of the threat from D’s act is required.

No, D’s apparent ability to commit a battery is sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do D’s words factor into whether P had reasonable apprehension?

A

Words alone are generally not enough but can be if coupled with conduct

Words can negate reasonable apprehension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Do threats to commit future battery constitute an assault?

A

No, this does not satisfy the immediacy requirement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the elements of false imprisonment

A

1) D’s act or omission to act that confines or restrainsP to a bounded area;

2) D’s intent to confine or restrain P to a bounded area; and

3) Causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are methods of confinement or restraint sufficient for false imprisonment?

A
  • Physical Barriers
  • Physical Force (to P or fam)
  • (In)direct Threats of Force
  • Failure to Release Under Legal Duty to do so
  • Invalid use of legal authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Is it relevant how short the period of confinement is for false imprisonment?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Does P need to be aware of the confinement for false imprisonment?

A

Yes (or be harmed by it)

19
Q

What is a bounded area for false imprisonment?

A

Freedom of movement must be limited in all directions

No REASONABLE means of escape KNOWN to P

20
Q

What are the elements of IIED?

A

1) D’s act amounting to extreme and outrageous conduct;

2) D’s intent to cause P to suffer severe emotional distress, or recklessness as to the effect of D’s conduct;

3) Causation; and

4) Damages—severe emotional distress.

21
Q

What is extreme or outrageous conduct for IIED?

A

Transcends all bounds of decency

Non-outrageous behavior can become outrageous if it is
* continuous
* done by a certain type of D (e.g., innkeeper, common carrier)
* directed toward a certain P (child, elderly, pregnant, sensitive if D knew)

22
Q

What is the requisite intent for IIED?

A

D’s recklessness as to the effect of his conduct will satisfy the intent requirement.

23
Q

Are actual damages required for IIED?

A

YES (only intentional tort where it is not just nominal)

To recover, P must show SEVERE emotional distress

Physical injury is not required but can evidence emotional distress

24
Q

What are the elements for trespass to land?

A

1) An act of physical invasion of plaintiff’s real property by defendant;

2) Intent on defendant’s part to bring about a physical invasion of plaintiff’s real property; and

3) Causation.

25
Does D need to enter the property to commit trespass to land?
No. Includes a person or object
26
What type of intent is needed for trespass to land?
D needed to intend to enter the land D need not intend to trespass on another's land
27
Are damage to the land required for trespass to land?
No. The invasion is the damage
28
What are the elements of trespass to chattels?
1) An act by defendant interfering with plaintiff’s right of possession in the chattel; 2)Intent to perform the act bringing about the interference with plaintiff’s right of possession; 3)Causation; and 4)Damages.
29
What are the two types of interference for trespass to chattels?
Intermeddling = directly damaging the chattel Dispossession = depriving P of their lawful right of possession of the chattel
30
What intent is required for trespass to chattels (or conversion)? Is mistake a defense?
Intent to do the act of interference is sufficient. Intent to trespass is not required. D's mistaken belief that he owns the chattel is not a defense
31
Are actual damages required for trespass to chattels?
Yes, but the chattel need not be damaged. Rather, the actual damage can be to the possessory right
32
What are the elements of conversion?
1)An act by defendant interfering with plaintiff’s right of possession in the chattel; 2)Intent to perform the act bringing about the interference with plaintiff’s right of possession; 3)Causation; and 4)Damages—an interference that is serious enough in nature or consequences to warrant that the defendant pay the full value of the chattel.
33
What types of acts usually amount to conversion?
wrongful acquisition (theft), wrongful transfer, wrongful detention, and substantially changing, severely damaging, or misusing a chattel.
34
What are the damages allowed for conversion?
Damages (FMV at time of conversion) Possession (replevin)
35
What are the defenses to intentional torts?
1. Consent 2. Protective Privileges * Self-Defense, Defense of Others, Recapture of Chattels 3. Necessity
36
Can P consent to a criminal act?
No (majority)
37
How to we determine if consent is valid?
Capacity (not drunk, not very young kids) Express vs. Implied * Express permissible unless procured through mistake, fraud, or duress * Apparent consent is that which a reasonable person would infer from custom and usage or the plaintiff’s conduct, * Consent is implied by law when an act is necessary to save someone's person or property
38
What two questions do we ask when determining if D consented to an intentional tort?
* Was there a valid consent? * Did the defendant stay within the boundaries of the consent?
39
When D invokes a defense due to a protective privilege, what three questions should we ask?
* Is the privilege available? These privileges apply only for preventing the commission of a tort. Already committed torts do not qualify. * Is a mistake permissible as to whether the tort being defended against (battery, trespass, etc.) is actually being committed? * Was a proper amount of force used?
40
How does the self-defense defense work? Is reasonable mistake allowed?
When a person reasonably believes that they are being or are about to be attacked, they may use such force as is reasonably necessary to protect against injury. A reasonable mistake as to the existence of the danger is allowed.
41
How does the defense of others defense work? Is reasonable mistake allowed?
One may use force to defend another when they reasonably believe that the other person could have used force to defend themselves. A reasonable mistake as to whether the other person is being attacked or has a right to defend themselves is permitted.
42
How does the defense of property defense work? Is reasonable mistake allowed? How much force can be used>
One may use reasonable force to prevent the commission of a tort against their real or personal property. A request to desist or leave must first be made unless it clearly would be futile or dangerous. A reasonable mistake is allowed as to whether an intrusion has occurred or whether a request to desist is required. Reasonable BUT one may not use force causing death or serious bodily harm unless the invasion of property also entails a serious threat of bodily harm
43
How does the defense of necessity work?
A person may interfere with the real or personal property of another when it is reasonably and apparently necessary in an emergency to avoid injury from a natural or other force and when the threatened injury is substantially more serious than the invasion
44