Intentional Torts: False Imprisonment and the Harassment Act 1997 Flashcards

1
Q

What is False imprisonment?

A

The complete and unlawful restrain of an individual by another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the elements of false imprisonment?

A
  • D must have intended the imprisonment
  • The restraint must have been total and complete
  • The Claimant need not know they are imprisoned
  • Usually there will have been an assault or battery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What Human rights article does this over lap with?

A

Article 5 of the European Convention of human rights. ‘Everybody has the right to liberty and security of a person- no one shall be deprived of his liberty save in lawful detentions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What should be taken from Letang v Cooper?

A

That negligent conduct is not sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happened in Sayers v Harlow UDC

A
  • Pregnant woman locked in toilet stall, dysfuction caused by negligent maintenance
  • Injured crawling over the top of the stall
  • She was not intentionally unlawfully imprisoned
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened Regina v Governor of her Majestys Prison Brockhill ex parte Evans (2000)

A
  • prisoner was not released from prison by the time that he had been said to have been released (an official court date)
  • Even unintentional miscalculation of lawful imprisonment can result in tortious liability
  • good faith is irrelevant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by total and complete restraint?

A
  • For somebody to be completely restrained

- falsely without their will or consent or lawful action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened in Bird v Jones?

A
  • C was prevented from crossing the Thames over a particular bridge
    However he was free to walk out of the way and take another bridge
  • This was found not to be false imprisonment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What about the claimants knowledge of imprisonment?

A

Knowledge is not needed to be know, you can be falsely imprisoned without knowing that you have been

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happened in Meeting v Graham White Aviation?

A
  • Claimant was accused of stealing at a place of employment and was asked to stay in a room and wait
  • The police were outside the door and were instructed by him to stop him if he had tried to leave
  • Intentionally and Falsely imprisoned
  • even though he wasn’t aware
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What year was the Harassment act brought in?

A

1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does it aim to achieve?

A
  • Providing civil and criminal remedies
  • originally set out for stalking offences
  • Has been used for broader harassment offences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How long is the imprisonment term for section 2

A

6 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What can a fine under section 2 not exceed

A

Level 5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Section one of the harassment act sets out?

A

Prohibition for harassment for one or more persons with the intention that they are doing such

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When is the harassment act applied?

A

Domestic Harassment
Workplace harassment
Creditor Harassment

17
Q

Can it arise from automated systems?

A

With Ferguson vs British gas it was seen to be ‘threats by a person and not by a computer’

18
Q

Define harassment?

A

The deliberate and persistent harassment of a person