internal Flashcards
(23 cards)
Rhodes must fall
challenges institutional racism
-protest at Oxford uni to remove statue of Cecil Rhodes who was a British colonist 19thC responsible for racism
what are the 3 subsections to institutional racism
1-marketisation and segregation
2-ethnocentric curriculum
3-assessment, access and IQism
Moore
US research
-admissions favour white pupils, use primary school reports to screen out pupils with language difficulties
-makes applications harder for ethnic minorities will be harder for them to attend good skls
-racism in interviews
David
national curriculum is “specifically British” only focus on white culture ignore non-british
ball
“little englandism” focus on white culture, attempt/ recreate ‘a mythical age of empire while ignoring black history’
-ethocentric curriculum, leads to under achieve bc low self esteem and fatalism bc no role models
coard
black culture and history taught as ‘primitive’ and how white people ‘civilised’ the groups
what’s new IQism
disadvantages black pupils as teachers less likely to label them as having unlocked potential
-means put in lower sets and entered for lower exams limited at a C
Gilbourne
assessment regime is rigged - ethnic minority pupils do worse on average in subjects w more teacher assessed components
sewell A03 for goudell
racism isn’t powerful enough to prevent an individual succeeding
-to deal with black boy under achievements should deal with external factors ie. fatherless
gilbournes view of Indian and Chinese
-image of Indian and Chinese pupils being ‘hardworking’ performs the ideological function
-this disguises the skls institutional racism
-this view makes ed seem meritocratic and that pupils succeed bc of effort ignores racism
sociologists used for institutional racism
-moore
-David
-ball
-coard
-gilbourne
-sewell
what are the 3 interns factors
-teacher labelling
-institutional racism
-response to subcultures
who are the teacher labelling sociologists
-glibourne and misra
-gilbourne and yodel
-wright
-archer
-osler
gilbourne and misra foundings
black pupils start as high achieving going into primary, by GCSE underachieving so must be internal fault
gilbourne and youdel
-skls are institutionally racist expect black to have behaviour issues / challenge authority
-labelled as no hopers
-placed in bottom sets in educational triage lead SFP
Osler
exclusions are higher for black boys
wright
teachers presume a British culture and an English superior
-assume have poor English/ understanding so are left out of discussions
- use babyish or simplistic language towards them
archer
inc A03
3 different stereotypes/ pupil identities
1 - IDEAL- white MC, masculine, straight, natural ability
2- PATHOLIGISED- aisian, asexual, overachiever, hardworking not natural
3- DEMONISED- black/white WC, unintelligent, poorly led, cultural dip under achiever
A03- pupils home background isn’t solely responsible for underachieving
response to subcultures sociologists
-fuller
-mizra
fuller
-inc A03
studied black girls in London negative stereotyped, channel anger into work and prove label wrong
-worked hard but didn’t follow skl rules bc didn’t agree w them
-proves can do well if dont conform
A03- labelling doesn’t always lead to SFP
Mizra
pupils were discouraged from pro careers due to labels
-saw teachers as patronising so didn’t listen, didn’t accept help, caused failure
price
Asians are more resistant to racism then blacks , so the impact of labelling is harsher on blacks
-aisians reject label and perform better
basset
-chinese think free state education is a blessing as they wouldn’t get it in their home of origin
-parents have high ambitions of their children and kids appreciate school more , less likely to join anti-ski sub
