Internation, Global or Transnational L1 Flashcards
(11 cards)
The world has become more global
- Globalization
Dimensions of globalization can be observed through
People: Increase migration from south to north (more opportunities)
Capital: Increase of trade in between states
Politics: Emergence of terrorism, conflicts in between states and climate change (common problem for all states)
Culture: Film broadcast becoming international - Netflix
3 Process of Globalization
Deterritorialization: The process through which social medias have been decreasing the constraint of geographical territory ; being able to have contact w/ people all over the world
Interdependence: The increase of social and political relationships in between states has decreased the matter of security and force (less fear of attacks)
Time & Space Compression: Easier to travel, places grow “closer” due to less cost of travel and less amount of time - 1h plane to change country.
3 Interpretation of Globalization (3 approaches)
- IR approach:
- The world is divided in b/w domestic and international (clearly defined territories w/ sovereignty)- States are the main actors
- Other actors (NSA’s) exist but are not important (negligible)
- Globalist approach:
- No borders: world divides - flattened
- Undifferentiated investment surface: money & people travel safely
- Decrease relevance of states
- Transnational critique:
- A problem of analytical purchase (explanatory power of a theory), we cannot ignore anymore that:
i. Relations develop between states and non - state actors
ii. States adapt to globalization: transgovernmentalism - Conceptualization: How states act w: NSA’s playing a role in the world
- A problem of analytical purchase (explanatory power of a theory), we cannot ignore anymore that:
–> Academic theories have been debating on the disappearance or persistence of the nation-state in the force of globalization.
Territorial Trap - John Agnew
(Conceptual error of thinking opposite of the answer)
- States do not have exclusive power over territories
- Domestic and foreign realms are not separate
- Boundaries of states are not the boundaries of the societies
3 Main concepts of Inter. Politics
1.Sovereignty as relational not absolute
- Rule existed in other forms (city-state)
- Territorial states is a recent invention
- No strict division of domestic /international
- Transnational elite networks / transgovernmentalism
- Space of power not homogenous, but made of networks
- Unified territorial control as a history
- Effective territorial sovereignty is a myth
- Power operates much more through networks
- Transnational social fields
- Identities as multiple & Hybrid:
- Nationalism is historically determined
- Identities have never entirely fit territorial borders
- Globalization has reinforced the discrepancy
- Hybridity, rather than homogeneity
Reading Part - Realism
Realism dominates international
relations
– Focus on states
– Focus on security (war and peace)
– Neglect for economic issues
Reading - Transnational interactions
Movement of tangible or intangible items
across state boundaries when at least one actor is not an agent of a government or an international organization.
Reading - Effects on Interstate politics
● attitude changes
○ face to face interaction
● international pluralism
○ linking of the interest of groups
● dependence and interdependence
○ transport and finance
● increasing ability of some states to influence other
○ transnational corporations
● autonomous actors with private foreign politics that may deliberately oppose or impinge on state politics
○ roman catholic church
○ banks
Reading - Def of World Politics
- “all political interactions between significant actors in a world system
– in which a significant actor is any somewhat autonomous individual or organization that controls
substantial resources
– and participates in political relationships with other actors across state lines” (p. 32)
TRANSNATIONAL RELATIONS & “LOSS OF-CONTROL” BY GOVERNMENTS
- States remain the most powerful
actors - Transnational relations create a
“control gap”: an empirical question
Reading - Values
-They enrich and strengthen the
strong and rich
- Could be considered as imperialism
- Keohane & Nye : Better speak of a
system of “asymetries” and
“inequalities”