International Law Flashcards
Declared War
state advises another that a formal state of war exists between them (ex: WWII)
Undeclared War
states participate in acts of aggression that aren’t declared as war (ex: Vietnam War)
Reprisal
when one country seizes property or persons of another as punishment for the second country’s offenses
Countermeasures
a nonmilitary form of sanction taken in response to another state’s conduct, typically of an economic nature (ex: freezing of assets, boycott, embargo)
Gunboat diplomacy
threatening conduct by one state to intimidate another (ex: Corfu Channel Case, U.S. military in Persian Gulf)
Low-intensity conflicts
a form of small-scale war between states below conventional war and above routine, peaceful competition
types of low-intensity conflicts
border wars, interventions (to restore democratic government), subversion (training or equipping paramilitary rebels)
Economic Sanctions
the use of coercive economic measures to bring about political change (ex: UN imposed boycott of South Africa, Arab boycott of Israel)
Use of Force (6)
war, reprisal, countermeasures, gunboat diplomacy, low-intensity conflicts, economic sanctions
Napoleanic Wars (1814)
first attempt to make war illegal (Austria, Prussia, Russia, France) before UN Charter
Hague Conferences (1899, 1907)
Russia’s Czar Nicolas led European effort to limit the use of force, but there was no international military force to enforce this, Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) formed from this
League of Nations (1919)
established the first collective security measures over and international organization, mutual defense system “war against one was war against all”
Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928)
US and France led treaty condemning war, required peaceful means to solve disputes
1933 Montevideo Treaty (Latin American Treaty)
prohibited the use of force and required only peaceful means to settle disputes under International Law
UN Charter 3 directives on use of force
- states may not use or threaten to use force 2. states may use force defensively when there is an “armed attack” 3. UN Security Council possesses a legal monopoly on the use of force
Chapter VII of UN Charter
procedure for authorizing the use of force
Article 39 of Ch. 7
SC determines the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression
Jus Ad Bellum
rules that govern the legality of the use of force or decision to go to war, follows Ch. 7 of UN Charter, before the actual act of war
Article 41 of Ch. 7
SC authorizes the use of nonmilitary measures to restore international peace and security (economic sanctions, sever diplomatic ties); problems: it takes a lot of time to implement this
Article 42 of Ch. 7
if SC determines Article 41 measures to be adequate, it may authorize the use of military force to restore international peace and security
Jus In Bello
laws that govern actions in war, when the shooting begins
inherent right of self defense
use of force must be “necessary” for defensive purposes (ex: 1842 Caroline case) and “proportional” in its execution
1842 Caroline case
test of necessity for self-defense. US. Britain, and Canada. Britain and Canada in war, Canadian rebels in US, Britain sent US ship Caroline over Niagra falls, doctrine of preemption, necessary for self-defense
Article 51
state can use force in self defense only in response to an “armed attack”
Notice requirement for self defense
state must notify the SC that they’ve been attacked and are engaging in self defense
Falklands War and Dirty War in Argentina
Britain vs. Argentina; Britain claimed self defense because Argentina invaded the islands for no reason
Collective self defense
the notion that an armed attack on one member of an organization of states constitutes an attack on all (NATO); country has to be asked for help
Nicaragua Case
ICJ case concerning the military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (principle of nonintervention); US doesn’t like communists in Nicaragua (domino effect), so they send troops to fight them, mine their harbors, drop leaflets about assassinating leaders, US argues self defense on behalf of El Salvador but they never asked US for help
ICJ position regarding self defense
principle of nonintervention trumps the right of collective self defense in cases regarding the overthrow of regimes
First Persian Gulf War (1990)
Iraq invades Kuwait to get access to ports and for power in OPEC (1/5 of world’s oil supply), example of collective self defense because a coalition of countries came to Kuwait’s aid
principle of nonintervention
a state can’t interfere in internal politics of another
Andean Crisis
Colombia invaded Ecuador to get FARC guerrilla groups but killed civilians, Colombia could argue self defense or imminent threat from guerrillas, Venezuela sent troops into Colombia because Ecuador asked for help, which is collective self defense
Russia’s invasion of Georgia
Russia invaded Georgia because 2 of Georgia’s provinces asked for help (they were having human rights infringed upon); Russia claimed self defense and Georgia claimed national sovereignty
Anticipatory self defense
rather than awaiting an armed attack pursuant to Art. 51, a state takes what it describes as defensive action to avoid some mounting aggression or threat by another state
Nuclear Weapons Case
advisory opinion; there are scenarios in which a state can use nuclear weapons in self defense (ex. during WWII when US dropped 2 bombs)
Humanitarian intervention
the use of force (don’t have to have permission from the UN) or other sanction across state line ostensibly aimed at alleviating grave human suffering due to starvation, disease, atrocity, widespread dispossession or gross persecution, or an imminent threat of such
Article 2(7)
prohibits intervention in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state. exception: this principle shall not prohibit the SC from enacting enforcement measures under Ch. 7. ex: Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia
legal requirements for humanitarian intervention
- consent of target state 2. SC authorization for intervention
unilateral humanitarian intervention
not permitted unless authorized by SC; a state can use force against another to save their citizens who are in danger (danger invites rescue)
collective humanitarian intervention
preferred method of intervention; UN Charter doesn’t say if states can undertake collective intervention without UN approval
Article 55c
under collective humanitarian intervention; UN shall promote universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, or religion (too broad)