INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Flashcards
(69 cards)
What is the consensus on the causes of war?
There is no consensus on the causes of war; they are often multicausal with immediate, underlying, and proximate causes.
Causes can be specific and overlapping.
What are some causes of war between countries?
- Economic Resources
- Policy Disagreements
- Political Regime Type
- Ethnic Identity
- Territorial Disputes
Each cause can lead to military conflicts or MIDs.
What does Woodrow Wilson state about the causes of war?
There is always more than one cause for war, and it is important to trace causal pathways.
This reflects the complexity of attributing weight to different causes.
Define the cause of war according to the lecture.
The conflict of interest that causes one state or another to escalate to the threat or actual use of military force.
This definition emphasizes the role of interests in the escalation to war.
What can scarcity of economic resources lead to?
Inter-state war and militarized interstate disputes (MIDs).
Example: The 1967 Arab-Israeli War.
What are some examples of policy disagreements that may lead to war?
- Arctic oil drilling
- LGBTQ and human rights abuses
- Diaspora mistreatment
- Weaponry use
The 2007 Israel-Syria MID was a specific example over nuclear development capabilities.
What role do political regime types play in conflicts of interest?
Disagreements over the type of political regimes can lead to conflicts, sometimes resulting in the use of force to remove repressive regimes.
Examples: Afghanistan 2001, Iraq 2003, Libya 2011.
How can ethnic identity contribute to the causes of war?
Identity issues along religious, cultural, linguistic, or ethnic lines can lead to conflicts, including expansionist or secessionist conflicts.
Example: The 1999 NATO-Serbia-Kosovo conflict.
What are territorial disputes and their potential impact?
Territorial disputes involve disagreement over possession or sovereignty of land and have a high potential for military conflict.
Example: Taiwan-PRC disputes.
What are the three types of causality in war?
- Immediate
- Underlying
- Distant
Immediate causes are direct triggers, underlying causes are pre-existing conditions, and distant causes are broad contextual factors.
What is the Realist view of war?
War is seen as a continuation of politics by another means, emphasizing survival and self-defense in an anarchic international system.
This view highlights power as a central attribute of inter-state relations.
What do Marxist theories attribute as the roots of war?
Capitalism and imperialism, specifically through competition and expansionism.
This perspective focuses on economic factors as primary causes.
According to the Liberal view, what fosters peace?
The importance of regimes, institutions, cooperation, interdependence, and the idea that democracies do not go to war with one another.
Wealth and prosperity create mutual interests, fostering peace.
What does the Constructivist view state about war?
War is what states make of it, emphasizing the intersubjective nature of state behavior and interactions.
Wendt’s perspective highlights that anarchy is constructed by state actions.
What is the conclusion regarding the causes of war?
Causes of war are viewed as conflicts of interests that can threaten or lead to the use of force, with causes being overlapping and varied in nature.
Theories disagree on the specific causes of war.
Who is the author of the essay ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak
What is the primary focus of Spivak’s essay?
The ability of marginalized groups, specifically subalterns, to have a voice in discourse.
True or False: Spivak argues that subalterns can effectively speak for themselves in dominant discourses.
False
What term does Spivak use to refer to groups that are socially, politically, and geographically outside the hegemonic power structure?
Subaltern
Fill in the blank: Spivak critiques Western intellectuals for __________ the voices of the subaltern.
speaking for
What does Spivak suggest is necessary for subalterns to be heard?
A rethinking of representation and power dynamics.