Interpretations+ Dramatisations 3 Flashcards
(18 cards)
Dramatisations RSC 2019 Doran
2.4- Angelo very inappropriately touches her
5.1- Angelo begins off very loud then begins to beg for mercy
5.1- Lucio begins begging on his knees to the Duke so he doesn’t have to remarry
Dramatisations- 2015 Donnellan
4.2- Angelo lifts up her dress takes off Isabella’s socks while she’s crying and he’s on his knees
5.1- Isabella sobbing on her knees and crying at the very end
Dramatisation- Desmond Davis 1979
2.4-Not as agressive but Isabella grabbed onto Angelo and he throws her off (In all productions she wears white)
5.1- Duke has very grand entrance and people start clapping.
Katherine Eisaman Maus (2008)
‘Angelo is sexually aroused by prohibition,her nun’s habit marks her as taboo: he finds her irresistible.
‘Some modern critics have found [Isabella’s] defiance heroic, others chilling or selfish.
in Shakespeare’s time, she elicited a similarly mixed response.’
Isabella is not exactly a rape victim; she must, as Angelo says, “fit her consent” to his proposal.
Does that consent, even reluctant, contaminate her with his sin?
Philip Brockbank (1989)
Dukes lies are white lies, Shakespeare and Duke are tricksters, but tricks played to serve a purpose
Jonathan Dollimore (1985)
Stigmatises sex as guilt, sinister form of ideological control (the Duke)
Harriet Hawkins and Cedric Watts (both in the 1980s)
the play’s lack of moral certainty.
L.C. Knights (1987)
play’s ambiguity is one of its strengths.
Lisa Jardine (1983)
Isabella’s character is drawn from a range of stereotypes of female behaviour; “while Isabella may seem to resist such stereotypes, her punishment is to be disliked by the play and its audience”.
Josephine Walters Bennett (1966)
‘we should enjoy the dilemmas of the characters without imagining that they could really happen’.
F. R. Leavis (1962)
The Duke is ‘a kind of Providence directing the action from above. His attitude is meant to be ours his total attitude, which is the attitude of the play.
George Bernard Shaw (1898)
play is ahead of its time, and that Shakespeare, ‘is ready and willing to start at the
twentieth century if only the seventeenth would let him’.
Walter Pater (1839-94)
It demonstrates ‘the tyranny of nature and circumstance over human action’. The play has a ‘finer justice’ than other plays, as it is more true to life:
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1827)
‘It is a hateful work… Our feelings of justice are grossly wounded by Angelo’s escape. Isabella
herself contrives to be unamiable, and Claudio is detestable.’
William Hazlitt (1817)
play is ‘as full of genius as it is of wisdom’; however, saying ‘our sympathies are repulsed and defeated in all directions’.
Dr Johnson (1765)
must sufficiently justify punishment … and I believe every reader feels some indignation when he finds him spared.’ contrasting elements make it a ‘mingled drama’, so the play is representative of real life, which combines the tragic and comic, good
and bad.
Charlotte Lennox (1753-55)
Shakespeare’s use of dark elements in the play, ‘tortures it into a Comedy
John Fletcher (1610)
‘a tragicomedy is not so called in respect of mirth and killing, but in respect it wants deaths, which is enough to make it no tragedy, yet brings some near it, which is enough to make it no comedy,