Interviewing & evidence notes Flashcards

PEACE, ADVOKAT, Q's etc

1
Q

PEACE MODEL

A

Plan and prepare
Engage and explain
Account
Closure
Evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the Planning and preparation phase of the interviewing model (PEACE)

A
  • Establish the aim and purpose of the interview.
  • what info do you have, need, facts known and facts need to be known.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe engage and explain phase of interviewing model (PEACE)

A
  • Build raport with the interviewee
  • explain process and legal requirements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe the Account phase of interviewing model (PEACE)

A
  • The main part of the interview, asking the interviewee to recall the event in detail
  • using both the cognitive approach and conversation management to establish a detailed account.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

describe the Closure phase of the interviewing model (PEACE)

A
  • summarise the main points of the interviewee’s account.
  • any legal issues or obligations discussed
  • thank the interviewee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

describe the evaluation phase of the interviewing model (PEACE)

A
  • Post interview, review the information and assess reliability of interviewee and info they gave
  • consider what info is still missing. any elements that need to be established
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cognitive Approach

A

Asking the interviewee to describe the event. Don’t interupt or ask leading questions.

Ask them to recall the event again.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Conversation Management

A

Ask interviewee what happened, then divide the story into sections/focal points and ask more detail about each.

probe focal points in chronological order for more detail

summarise account back to interviewee to confirm understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

4 core skills of interviewing

A
  • plan & prepare
  • Active listening
  • Rapport Building
  • Questioning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

6 closing questions

A

1 - is there anything further you wish to say?

2 - have your answers to my questions been made of your own free will?

3 - has any threat promise of offer of advantage been held out to you during this conversation

4 - will you now read aloud my record of our conversation?

5 - is it a correct record of our conversation?

6 - will you now sign my police notebook as a correct record of our conversation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

TEDS question

A
  • opening questions to assist subject recal, used at the begining of interview

tell me…
explain to me…
describe to me…
show me…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

5WH questions

A

Who, What, When, Where, Why, How

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

description of ADVOKAT

A

list of questions to rest the reliability and credibility of the eyewitness

  • amount of time under observation
  • distance from incident
  • visibility at the time
  • obstructions in view
  • known or seen before
  • any reason to notice
  • time since observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Closed questions

A

typically done at the end of interview to ellicit a short answer for gathering crucial information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is hearsay?

A

information gathered by word of mouth or secondhand information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why is hearsay excluded in court?

A

because the truth of the statement can’t be tested unless the original source of information is called to give evidence and be cross-examined

17
Q

Exceptions to hearsay evidence (FATBITCH)

A

First hand hearsay person unavailable (EA s65)

Admissions (EA s81)

Telecomms and electronic records (EA s71)

Business records (EA s69)

Identification of a person, place, thing (EA s66)

Tags, labels and writing (EA s70)

Contemporaneous notes about a person’s health

Hearsay for a non hearsay purpose (EA s60)0

18
Q

Admissibility of evidence

A

Relevance - relevant to situation
Reliable - accuracy of evidence
Fairness - gathered legally

19
Q

Opinions

A
  • a view or judgement about something, not necessarily based on knowledge
  • opinions are unreliable and unfair to the accused, however there are exceptions
  • Evidence Act s78 - Lay opinion
    opinion is based on what person saw, heard, or perceived about matter
    “I saw that drunk man over there” - (what made you think they were drunk?)
  • Evidence Act s79 - Expert Opinion
    Specialised knowledge based on persons training, study, exp
20
Q

Types of evidence

A

Original - facts perceived by witness
Real - Physical evidence (DNA, stolen goods etc)
Documentary - evidence contain in documents

Direct - facts that support the truth of an assertion
Indirect - circumstantial evidence, when combined with additional evidence proves guilt. (CCTV_

Inculpatory - evidence that proves guilt
Exculpatory - evidece that exonerates accused

21
Q

What are Facts Sheets

A

A document presented to court that has a comprehensive record of the alleged actions of the accused in chronological order that satisfies all elements of an offence.

22
Q

When are fact sheets prepared

A

when there are criminal proceedings against a person via FCAN, FSCAN, Arrest

23
Q

Componenets of a Fact sheet

A
  • Antecedents
  • Elements of the offence
  • succint narrative of the event
  • types of evidence, admissions - and your reasonable cause to suspect
  • offenders/accused, Victims, witness, injuries, property value, drug value, expert evidence
24
Q

what are facts sheets used for?

A

for the court and the accused to establish the facts and key points that is clear, succinct and easy to understand

25
4 types of interviews
- casual interviews - notebook interviews - formal interviews - ERISP
26
What is reasonable suspicion?
A police officer has a well-founded belief based on specific facts that a person is likely involved in criminal activity. It requires factual basis, even if the information is hearsay or might not be admissible evidence in court, it is assessed on the totality of circumstances that the police officer is presented with at the time.
27
what are focal points?
when you break someones account down into specific topics
28
6 closing questions summarised into key words for each question
1 - anything further to say? 2 - answers free will? 3 - any threat or promise? 4 - read aloud my record? 5 - correct record? 6 - sign the notebook?