is sociology a sciene Flashcards
(38 cards)
what do positivist say
- objective facts about social world in statistics. discovered directly by our senses - see
- facts not influenced by personal beliefs
- look for correlations to find causal relationships= relation b/w 2 phenomenon causing other to take place
- possible to uncover the laws of human behaviour i
- scientific, =study what you observe. I unscientific to study people’s emotions.
- possible to classify social world in objective way= possible to count observable social facts n get statistics
- laws of human behaviour can be found by collection of objective facts of social world in stats form
- use inductive approach = collect data -> observation -> pattern -> hypothesis ->theory -> tested against others
- subject matter of society similar to natural sciences ; humans react to external forces
human behaviour caused n predictable
what does durkheim say
positivist
- social facts be considered =make people behave in ways
- human behaviour can be explained with xternal stimuli (things happen to us) than internal (mind
- society directed by collective beliefs, values n laws - by social facts
- used quantitative, scientific methods
- –used stats on suicide oto support claim that unobservable forces shaped human behaviour
- –essential to achieve right amount of integration n regulation
what is durkheim study of sucidie
- wanted to show suicide not explained fully by psychologists
- personal reasons not account for suicide rate e.g no relation b/w insanity n suicide rate
- suicide available stats = social facts to find causes n make correlations n find patterns to reveal causual relationship
4.suicide rates higher in protestant countries than catholic,
jews - lower suicide rate than roman cath
married people more suicide rate, war reduce suicide - religion more important than education - jews had low suicide rate with high education level
durkheim study of suicide - types of suicide & result
- egoistic suicide - from being insufficiently integrated into social groups n society they belonged
- –catholic religion integrated member more strongly into religious community
- –protestant church encouraged people to develop own interpretation of religion = less belong to community n integrated circj
- –unmarried n childless less integrated into family - anomic suicide = society not regulate individual enough = trad norms n values disrupted by social change = uncertainty in behaviour guidelines = anomie
- –suicide rise during economic depression n prosperity
- –rising salries n living standards = higher suicide rates —specialized division of labour = societies less integrated - altruistic suicide = well integrated into society - sacrificed own life out of sense of duty to others
- – Hindu widows kill self at husband funeral - fatalistic suicide = society restricted person too much- suicide of person with future blocked n passion oppressed. excess regulation
positivist Reponses to durkheim
halbwachs
gibbs + martin
- Halbwachs = use more recent suicide statistics n new methods of statistical analysis
- —overestimated importance of religion in suicide rate - Gibbs + martin = agree suicide should be studied with scientific methods n stats data
- –he used concepts that cant be observed or measured = not follow positivist methods
- –fail to define ‘integration’ in measurable way
- –cant test theory that lack integration
what does comte say about positivism
- ‘Age of Reason’ believed society could be studied w objective & rational eye. through formal observations.
- ‘positivist philosophy’ - good social science, like sociology, should use hypotheses to guide our study
3 three stages of progress in our understanding of world: - Theological stage – early human society (events caused by actions of gods)
- Metaphysical stage – focus shifts from the divine (such as God) to the human (abstract forces)
- Scientific stage – final stage science provides explanations - scientific laws
comte positivism
- scientific study of scoiety should be confined to collecting info about phenomena to be objectively observed n classified
- should not be concerned with internal meanings, motives, feelings n emotions= only in consciousness- cant be observed or measured
- social phenomena like physical phenomena copying the methods of natural sciences.
what does popper say
falsification
- reject inductive approach = whatever study will be informed by initial theory
- use deductive approach = theory -> hypothesis -> observation -> confirmation
- falsify it to prove it wrong
- never possible to verify theory - instead discover law of human behaviour
- always at some point, evidence/examples will not fit theory n prove theory untrue
e. g all swans white confirmed by observations but misleading if observer not been to AUS with black swans - scientific knowledge never be taken final unconvertible truth - always disproved
popper falsification theory
- start with hypothesis or statement to deduce predictions aout future
e. g Newton’s Law of graity allow hypotheses made about movement of bodies of mass - used to make prediction against future events - dont matter how theory originates - doesnt have to come from prior observation or analysis
- not possible to produce laws thats true all time
- scientist need to constantly find evidence to disprove or falsify theories
laboratory experiment -
- lab allow precise predictions - controlled env so researcher can manipulate variables = calculate effects n remove other factors
- e.g experiment of light on plant growths t
- –control group plants expose to light n experiment group more/less light than them = result observed, measured n quantified - allow to isolate variable than observed plants in wild
- allow replication- reproduce conditions for same results
Popper; allow precision n repeated testing prediction but not use laboratory experiments;
- unnatural situations - people under eye knowing= affect behaviour n ruin result validity
- impractical to do in lab, cant fit all community
field experiments
-e.g rown n gay of fake job application by letter n phone from diff ethnic group - non white people less likely to lead to job interview
- e.g ask direction by actor - appearance of actor changed from businessman to labourer = public more helpful to businessman costume
- – cant control variables as closely - not same time or place
- – hawthorne effect = reduce knowledge of people knowing experiment = ethical risks with no consent
- less gov willing to surrender authroity to researcher to test theories n hypothesis
interpretivist view
- scientific method useful only to natural phenomena where no quesion of consciousness or reflexivity
- scientific method cant be used to understand social action
- study of human society must go beyond empirical n objective evidence to include subjective views, opinions, emotions, values (unobservable)
require interpretation.
4.Iresearch cant establish social facts,
cant be understood by stats, figures, facts - sociology is interpretation of social action = only understood by interpret meanings n motives
- people actively construct own social reality - not imposed by external factors = dont react automatically but interpret meaning before responding .
e.g motorist see red light not stop in response - attach meaning to stimulus before acting = light could be decoration or brothel
7, explain human behaviour by understanding subjective states
max weber - interpretivism
proestant ethic
-
- –>relationship b/w rise of Protestantism n development of western industrial capitalism
- –>ascetic calvinist Protestantism took over development of capitalism
- –>capitalism develop where religion influential
- –>calvinist protestantism believe elect = chosen to go heaven by god by how they behaved, carry duties
- –>encourage abstinence from pleasures n self discipline, worked hard in jobs to make money = success
- –>protestant attacked time waster, lazy, idle, gossip, sexual pleasures (sex for baby n after married)
- –>spirit of capitalism = set of ideas,ethics,values = way of life with ethics, duties, obligations n make money
- –>making money became religious n business ethic
- –> protestantism encouraged standardization & specializeddivison of labour
- —> limitts on consumption of wealth= increase more for saving n investments businesses
- –>religion dont expect them to test beliefs scientifically or expect religious beliefs to weigh on cost & benefits of joining religious group
- –> help build capitalist society
- –> formal rationality = best means to achieve given end in stats form
- –> hard for religious follower to keep faith = secularisation
interpretivist
- – explain social action need understanding of meanings n motives of human behaviour = interpret meanings given to action
- – achieve by verstehen - imagine self in position/ empathetic understanding of behaviour
max weber evaluation
- Somart = calvinism was against greed n money pursuit
- –> doctrine not meant to produce rational pursuit of profit = unintentional consequences - Calvinist countries like switz, hungary but not among first capitalist countries
- –> Marshall; scotland had capitalist mentality but held back by lack of labour & capital investment - question if religious beliefs of calvinist led to people being business people
- –>non calvinist devoted themselves as business= excluded from holding office n joining profession like jews - Marxist = early capitalism came before n determined Protestantism = protestantism was ideology capitalists used to legitimate position
- –> question if calvinism or capitalism came first
- –> Weber; pre capitalist money making ventures not rational organized for profits
what is kuhn view - paradigms and scientific revolution
- –> see scientists as objective &neutral, & working together to refine scientific knowledge = evolving gradually, new evidence helps to refine &develop existing theories.
- –> argue evolution of scientific knowledge is limited by ‘paradigms’. = basic world-view give framework for thinking of world; assumptions of reality =limit questions scientists ask in research.
- –> scientists build their careers working within the dominant paradigm, & ignore evidence that dont fit with l framework
- –> those who ask questions outside of ‘dominant paradigm’ = marginalised, not taken seriously.
- –> ‘rogue scientists’ look world differently work in alternative research, with enough evidence builds up = contradicts existing paradigms, a ‘paradigm shift’ happens = i old paradigms are rejected, new dominant paradigm comes into force.
kuhn view
- –> sociology not mature, mainstream science, = hasn’t found a unifying paradigm. not share aset of assumptions about world /how to do research
- –> radical science” challenges assumptions n possible to be paradigm shift, n radical science become new mainstream.
- –> series of ‘revolutions’ to paragim shift & new ‘paradigms’ to replace old ‘paradigms’’ accepted.
- –> science not be seen as characterised by consensus – many competing paradigms
- –> current paradigms not accepted forever n true
- –> Normal science = research based on past scientific achievements, as foundation further practice., gradual build up of evidence not fit accepted paradigm
e. g climate change = human activity impacting first treated sceptically but now be accepted (Sutton) like burning fossilfuels
- –> belief of continents moving / drift over earth surface seen ridiculous for many years = rejected= hard to investigate them = marginalised scientist
evaluation of kuhn
-
positivistic evaluation
-
Realism views
sayers
- –> closed systems,; physics chemistry, - only limited variables interacting, controlled, possible to carry out laboratory experiments & precise predictions
- –> open system; meteorology operate = cannot control all variables. = unpredictability.
- —> Meteorology still scientific – models based on observation = predict w certainty when weather events happen, & models being refined.
- –> open systems sciences trying to find ‘underlying structures’ - not directly observed, like magnetic fields, interfere with weather patterns.
- –> can be scientific ; meteorology is scientific, but not scientific in the way physics or chemistry can be scientific:
- —> Quantitative sociology, e.g reveal hidden structures ( class structure), a& make predictions about what % people in lower class background will fail,
symbolic interactionism
- –> dont reject attempt to establish casual relationship
- —> believe stats dont give insight into behaviour
- –> behaviour governed by internal processes - people interpret world around n give meaning
- —> people have self concept/image built up, reinforced, modified during interaction with others = have image of what sort person they are n tend to act with image
- —> response of others make it hard for them to sustain self concept = changing n behaviour will also change
- —> labelling as deviant or educational success/failures produce self fulfilling prophecy
symbolic interactionist blumer
- –> sociologist conduct research only superficial familiarity with area of life
- –> result = impose definitions on social world with little regard for relevance to world
- –> not view social reality from actor’s view but force into predefined categories n concepts = small chance of getting true social reality
- —> industrialization cause replacement of extended families with nuclear
- —> meaning n interpretations to industrialization n family essential before relationship created b/w 2 factors
- —> sociologist must immerse self into area of life than fit data into predefined categories = learn actor’s view of social reality
interpretive view oof suicide
douglas
—-> criticise use of states to study suicide
—> decision if sudden death is suicide made by coroner n influenced by other people like family n friends
—-> sysematic bias can enter in reaching decision
—-> e.g person integrated into social group - friends/family likely to deny suicide possibility to themselves n coroner = feel responsibility = cover up suicide
—-> see stats as negotiation between diff parties
distortion of stats systematic
—> bad to treat a;; suicide as same type of act w/o investigating meaning attached to act of victims
—> diff cultures suicide have diff meanings e.g businessman in modern industrial society suicide = business failed in contrast to elderly eskimo who kill himself for benefit of society
—-> needs to discover meanings, interview those victim’s close relations n analyse secondary sources from victim
—-> common suicide in western industrial society = transform soul to get to heaven /
transform of self = get others tothink of them differently /
suicide as achieving fellow feeling for sympathy
suicide to get revenge make them feel guity
feminist approaches methods
- attack on malestream research = critique previous male dominated mainstream research
- distinctive feminist research methods = more conventional scientific methods men use that not good to understand social reality
- feminism reveal epistemology/theory/knowledge