Issues and Debates Flashcards
(36 cards)
Define Androcentrism & give an example from psychology
- Research based only on males which is then used as the standard or expected norm for both genders
- Any bhvr that deviates from this ‘norm’ would be seen as abnormal or inferior
- Based on belief of universality
- Leads to female bhvr being misunderstood or pathologised (taken as sign of psychological instability)
- Example: Milgram’s research
- Can lead to beta bias
Define alpha bias & give an example from psychology
- Research/theories misrepresent bhvrs as it exaggerates differences between males and females, reinforcing gender stereotypes and usually devaluing women as they are not often seen as the norm.
- Example: Theory of sexual selection; Buss’ Research
Define beta bias & give an example from psychology
- Research/theories misrepresent bhvr as they ignore or minimise differences between males and females.
- Important aspects of female experience are ignored, so limits any conclusions drawn.
- Often occurs when female ppts aren’t included in sample and it’s assumed conclusions can be applied to all genders
- Example: Fight or flight response claimed to be universal response of stress but research has found women are more likely to “tend and befriend”
AO3 on gender bias
:( Contribute to gender discrimination: based on biological app. which states gender differences are innate and therefore universal. Could lead to stereotypes like women being dependent/caregivers and men being aggressive/providers being justified. Leads to gender discrimination in the workplace.
:( Can affect conclusions made in research: Maccoby and Jacklin presented findings on several gender studies which showed girls have superior verbal ability while boys have better spatial ability; suggested these differences are hard wired into brain before birth and became widely reported and seen as facts. However, Joel et al. used brain scanning techniques and found no differences in brain structures or processing and believed theory popularised as it fitted gender stereotypes of girls being “Speakers” and boys “Doers”.
-> Discuss: Should still do research on brain differences, but we shouldn’t exaggerate findings. Research demonstrated women better at multitasking compared to males due to women’s brains having stronger connections between left and right hemispheres, so there is some facts showing males and females have different brain structures.
:) Clear understanding that there are gender differences and universality not possible. However, it’s impossible to research through completely objective eyes as everyone has gender and unconscious prejudices. To overcome this, researchers should give consideration to the matter or gender bias in research. Zimbardo’s study used an all male sample, but was only looking at american prisons, where majority of guards and prisoners are male - important not to generalise to everyone. Recognition important in ensuring effects of gender bias are minimised when doing psychological research and generalising theories of bhvr to both genders.
Define Culture bias
- When psychological studies or theories ignore cultural differences assuming their findings can be generalised globally.
- Much research done in Western universities meaning results only applicable to that culture.
- Bias researchers have assumed that their culture is the norm.
- Can lead to ethnocentrism
- Example: Asch’s study only done on American individuals - individualist culture so low conformity; may have had alternative results from a country that’s collectivist as these individuals may be more concerned with group’s beliefs, so difficult to generalise.
AO3 culture bias
Due to emigration into different countries, the terms individualistic and collectivist cultures are outdated, as now there are mixtures of these cultures within countries - Lacks temporal validity.
Define ethnocentrism
- Assumption that one ethnic group is superior to another, or to all ethnic groups, and emphasising the importance of one’s own culture.
- Leads to belief that bhvrs of their ethnic group/culture is the norm and others seen as abnormal or strange
- Example: Ainsworth’s strange situation: Secure attachment seen as the norm & superior attachment style. Other parenting styles, which are the norm in other countries/cultures, are seen as abnormal. E.g. avoidant attachment in Germany seen as norm
AO3 on ethnocentrism
- Can lead to racism as psychologists publish research concluding that one culture is superior.
- E.g. in WW1, army recruitment IQ test was based on western information, so eastern Europeans and African Americans that scored lower were labelled as feeble minded - created stereotype that these people are mentally unfit.
- Led to discriminatory immigration policies - and can lead to them getting sterilised so they can’t have children
Define cultural relativism
- A good thing!! - DON’T GENERALISE
- Opinion that there is no right or wrong bhvr and that it’s important to consider individual’s bhvr within their culture before making judgements.
- This is because social norms are culturally relative as what’s considered acceptable in one culture may be unacceptable in others.
- Example: Definitions of abnormality lack cultural relativism: some cultures may see hearing voices as normal e.g. some African cultures see it as a sign from a higher power
AO3 on cultural relativism
- Some things may be innate - not everything is culturally relative
- Interactional synchrony and reciprocity have been found to be universal components of attachment - can’t assume cultural relativism
- Need to think about relative contribution of nature and nurture
Examples of 3 types of hard determinism
- Biological determinism: Individual’s bhvr controlled by internal physiological factors e.g. genetics, neuroanatomy, neurochemistry etc. making bhvr inevitable.
-> Example: Biological approach in OCD states low serotonin inevitably leads to compulsions and obsessions in OCD. - Environmental determinism: Individual’s bhvr controlled by external factors e.g. operant and classical conditioning, making bhvr inevitable.
-> Example: Behaviourist approach in phobias states learning to associate a stimulus with anxiety results in development in phobia - Psychic determinism: Individual’s bhvr controlled by internal factors such as structure of personality and external factors such as childhood experiences, making bhvr inevitable.
-> Psychodynamic approach states an overactive id leads to impulsive personality and overactive superego leads to an anxious personality
define soft determinism and give examples
Individual’s bhvr in controlled by int/ext factors, with some element of free will. e.g. Cognitive approach & Social Learning Theory
- In CBT, individuals can choose to identify and dispute irrational thoughts and turn them into rational ones
Define Free will and give examples
Individual has choice over their behaviour and can choose to reject and int/ext factors affecting bhvr. e.g. humanistic approach
Define hard determinism and give examples
Behaviour entirely controlled by int/ext factors, making bhvr inevitable, rejecting any role of free will.
-> Example: Beck’s negative triad states a negative schema and irrational thoughts of self, world and future inevitably lead to depression
What is the scientific emphasis on causal explanations?
- Causal relationship - means cause and effect - stems from determinism
- Causal relationships can be established from controlled methods - lab exp and controlled obs
- If DV changes when all extraneous variables are controlled, IV is the cause, so cause and effect can be established
AO3 on Determinism vs Free will
- Libet et al.: ppts chose random moment to flick their wrist while he measured activity in the brain (readiness potential). Ppts had to say when they felt conscious will to move. Found that the unconscious brain activity leading up to conscious decision came around half a second before ppt consciously decided to move. Could mean there’s no free will in actions as they get determined by unconscious brain activity before conscious decision to carry out the action occurs - Free will is just an illusion. However, the individual can still choose not to carry out the action via conscious decision making - so there is an element of free will - e.g. in aggression there’s conscious awareness in carrying out aggressive acts.
- Determinism can be a good thing as it has practical applications in treatments: e.g. low serotonin said to lead to symptoms of OCD such as compulsions and obsessions. Taking SSRIs can balance serotonin levels and lead to reduced anxiety, leading to reduced compulsions and obsessions.
- Use of determinism IRL inconsistent w/ legal system: Doesn’t use hard determinism as it hods criminals accountable for their actions, meaning it does take into account some element of free will. If hard determinism had a place in legal system, it would be unfair to place criminals in jail and hold them accountable for bhvr as they would be determined by int/ext factors making bhvr inevitable e.g. people can’t control whether they inherit MAOA-L gene variant.
- Free will seen as more positive stance than determinism: Allows people to believe they have a choice over bhvr, which may have positive effect on mental health. e.g. research suggest that people who have an internal LOC, believing they have high influence over bhvr, tend to be more mentally healthy compared to those with an external LOC, who were found to be at greater risk of developing depression. Suggests even if we don’t have free will, thinking we do can have positive effects on mind and bhvr.
Define holism
proposes that we should examine individuals’ complex bhvr by taking into consideration all aspects of their experience and context, including culture
e.g. humanism explains complex human bhvr by focusing on broader experiences and circumstances(culture and socioeconomic background)
Define reductionism
Examines complex human bhvr by breaking it down into smaller constituent parts. e.g. Biological approach explains human bhvr by reducing down into simple basic biological units - genes, neurotransmitters
Define biological reductionism
Explaining complex human bhvr by reducing down to basic biological systems e.g. genetics, physiology of the body, brain or biochemistry.
e.g. biological approach in aggression: inheriting MAOA-L gene variant leads to aggression
Define Environmental reductionism
Simplifies complex human bhvr down to learning through stimulus-response association i.e. classical conditioning
e.g. Phobias: learning to associate stimulus w/ anxiety leads to development of phobias
Levels of explanation of reductionism vs holism - from most holistic to most reductionist
level 1: Social and Cultural Exp: Humanism
level 2: Psychological Exp: Psychodynamic, SLT, Cognitive, Behaviourist
level 3: Biological exp: Biological
AO3 for reductionism vs holism
- Holism praised for explaining aspects of social bhvr which only arise in group settings and can’t be understood at level of individual group member (reductionist). E.g. Asch’s study: Changed group size & measured influence of increasing group size on conformity - when group size increased, conformity of individual increased - can only study at holistic level as there’s no specific “conformity gene”.
- Reductionist explanations scientific: Reduces humna bhvr down to simple basic units by carrying out lab exp., controlled obs etc, to establish causal rs between human bhvr and IVs - easy to measure basic units. E.g. Low serotonin leads to OCD - measured through urine tests. Reductionist approach good as it can help create treatments e.g. SSRIs used to reduce compulsions and obsessions in OCD - helps people in the real world.
- Oversimplifies complex phenomena: Reduces internal validity of the approach and its explanation of human bhvr. E.g. Biological approach states sz caused by genetics(oversimplified), however interactionist approach states that both diathesis nature e.g. genetic, and stress nurture e.g. family dysfunction, needed to lead to sz. Can lead to psychologists losing sight of bhvr in context, limiting reductionist approach in psychology.
Mintro for nature and nurture
Discusses whether bhvr is due to nature(genes) or nurture(environment and experiences)
Define nature
- Approach taken by Nativist psychologists
- Believe in importance of heredity(nature) - idea that human bhvrs are innate and passed on from one generation to the next via genetics.
- Example: Bowlby: Babies born with social releasers - born with the innate need to form attachment to survive