John Rawls' Ethical Theory on Justice as Fairness Flashcards

1
Q

is Rawls’s theory of justice for a liberal society. He constructs justice as fairness around specific interpretations of the ideas that citizens are free and equal, and that society should be fair.

A

Justice as fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aims to create a just society by emphasising equal opportunities and basic rights while taking into account how people should be treated fairly, particularly the least fortunate.

A

Justice as fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

He was an American political philosopher in the liberal tradition, born and raised in Baltimore, Maryland. His father was a prominent lawyer, and his mother was a chapter president of the League of Women Voters.

A

John Rawls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

John Rawls most discussed work is his theory of a just liberal society, called ___________.

A

justice as fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

refers to concepts of fairness, equality, moral behavior, lawfulness, and order. It also means giving the person what he or she deserves or giving each person his or her due.

A

Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

An ability to judge without reference to one’s feelings or interest.

A

Fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Three Types of Justice

A

Distributive Justice
Retributive Justice
Compensatory Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Refers to the extent which society’s institutions ensure that benefits and burdens are distributed among society’s members in ways that are fair and just.

A

Distributive Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Refers to the extent to which punishments are fair and just.

A

Retributive Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Refers to the extent to which people are fairly compensated for their injuries by those who have injured them.

A

Compensatory Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Refers to the fundamental social, economic, and political institutions that shape the overall framework of a society. These institutions include the legal and political system, the economic structure, educational institutions, and other foundational elements that determine the distribution of rights, resources, and opportunities within a society.

A

Basic Structure of Society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

It is also the location of justice because institutions, such as political and social institutions distribute the main benefits and burdens of social life, and will significantly impact individuals’ life.

A

Basic Structure of Society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

2 guiding ideas of justice as fairness

A

The Original Position and Veil of Ignorance
The Two Principles of Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

a hypothetical state where individuals come together to establish principles for a just society. This idea involves a hypothetical scenario where individuals, unaware of their own attributes and social standings, craft principles for a just society.

A

Original Position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ensures impartiality, as individuals aim to create principles that benefit everyone equally, irrespective of their personal circumstances.

A

Veil of Ignorance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

These principles work in tandem to create a framework for a just society. The first principle ensures universal access to essential freedoms, while the second principle aims to ensure fairness in the distribution of opportunities and resources, emphasizing a focus on uplifting the least advantaged in society.

A

The Two Principles of Justice

17
Q

The Two Principles of Justice

A

The Principle of Equal Liberty
The Principle of Difference and Fair Equality of Opportunity

18
Q

states that each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others.

A

The Principle of Equal Liberty

19
Q

states that social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both –

 1.To the greatest benefit of the least advantaged, and 
 2.Attached to offices and positions open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity.
A

The Principle of Difference and Fair Equality of Opportunity

20
Q

refers to the fair treatment of individuals within a society, irrespective of their background, beliefs, or social status. It encompasses the protection of citizens’ rights, access to legal recourse, and equality before the law.

A

Citizen justice

21
Q

pertains to the equitable distribution of resources, opportunities, and privileges within a community. It encompasses social welfare, economic equality, and the elimination of systemic injustices that marginalize certain groups.

A

Societal justice

22
Q

one where all members have access to education, healthcare, employment, and other essential services without facing discrimination or disadvantage based on factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status.

A

fair society

23
Q

involves equal opportunities for all individuals to thrive and contribute to the community without facing unjust barriers or prejudices.

A

Fairness in the context of citizenship

24
Q

involves fostering an inclusive environment where diversity is celebrated, and everyone has a voice in shaping the collective future.

A

societal fairness

25
Q

aims to move from these abstract conceptions to determinate principles of social justice. It does so by translating the question: “What are fair terms of social cooperation for free and equal citizens?” into the question “What terms of cooperation would free and equal citizens agree to under fair conditions?”.

A

The Original Position

26
Q

is a fair situation in which each citizen is represented as only a free and equal citizen: each representative wants only what free and equal citizens want, and each tries to agree to principles for the basic structure while situated fairly with respect to the other representatives.

A

The Original Position

27
Q

It is a theoretical device or hypothetical separation between the decision-maker and the society he lives in. It prevents him from knowing any material facts about himself or the people for whom he is making the rule.

A

The Veil of Ignorance

28
Q

The Veil of Ignorance
FACTORS

A

Demographic Facts
Societal Facts
Facts about the decision-maker’s view of the good

29
Q

Examples of which may be age, sex, ethnicity, level of income, colour, employment, personal strengths and weaknesses, etc.

A

Demographic Facts

30
Q

Examples of which may be the type of government, societal organisation, culture and traditions, etc.

A

Societal Facts

31
Q

These are the decision-maker’s values and preferences of how one’s life should be. It also includes specific morals and political beliefs.

A

Facts about the decision-maker’s view of the good

32
Q

two main aspects of the veil of ignorance

A

self-ignorance and public ignorance

33
Q

it abstains the decision-maker from knowing anything about himself. It is essential for him to not know his own position in society, because knowing may tempt him to make decisions that favour his future self considering his private interests.

A

self-ignorance

34
Q

it abstains the decision-maker from knowing anything about the entities for whom he is making the decision. Such ignorance is crucial to avoid the personal bias of the decision-maker.

A

public ignorance

35
Q

makes the parties just be their usual rational selves, instead of being influenced by circumstantial factors. It prevents the privileged from pressurising the vulnerable or underprivileged, as everybody is equal in the original position. The veil ensures that policies are made in the best interest of the entire society, and not just a majority of it.

A

The Veil of Ignorance

36
Q

The argument from the original position has two parts.

A

The Selection of Principles
The Check for Stability

37
Q

The first part of the original position contains two fundamental comparisons between Rawls’s principles and utilitarian principles.

A

In the first comparison, the parties compare Rawls’s principles to the principle of average utility: the principle that the basic structure should be arranged so as to produce the highest level of utility averaged among all citizens.

In this second comparison, Rawls argues that the parties will favor justice as fairness because its principles provide a better basis for enduring cooperation among all citizens.

38
Q

Having selected the two principles of justice as fairness, the parties turn to the second part of the original position: the check that these principles can order a society stably over time.

A

The Check for Stability