Judicial Restraint - Presumption of Constitutionality, Double Construction, Mootness Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

What is the constitutional basis for courts deferring to the Oireachtas on financial matters?

A

Article 17 – Only the Oireachtas can raise and spend public money; courts must show restraint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What case reaffirmed the presumption of constitutionality in a challenge to Domiciliary Care Allowance?

A

Donnelly & Anor v Minister for Social Protection (Article 40.1 equality challenge)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do courts treat tax and welfare legislation under the presumption?

A

With greater deference due to the complex policy nature (e.g., Madigan, Hyland)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the presumption of constitutionality?

A

All legislation is presumed constitutional unless the contrary is clearly proven.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the double construction rule?

A

If a law can be interpreted in two ways, courts choose the reading that upholds constitutionality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case affirmed that taxation laws get very considerable latitude?

A

Madigan v Attorney General

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What principle prevents courts from deciding on theoretical or irrelevant issues?

A

The mootness principle — courts avoid ruling on issues that are no longer live.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is meant by judicial deference?

A

Courts allow space for policy decisions by the legislature or executive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case said deference is not optional but mandated by the Constitution?

A

NP & Burke v Minister for Education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What article supports judicial deference in money matters?

A

Article 17 — only the Oireachtas can raise and spend public money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What Article was at issue in the Donnelly case challenging DCA?

A

Article 40.1 — equality before the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why did the appellants in Donnelly argue for reduced presumption?

A

Because they claimed to be in a similar position (caring for a child with disability but in hospital instead of home) to those receiving the benefit, but were excluded — raising an Article 40.1 equality issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What unnamed rights are protected under Article 40.3?

A

Rights like privacy, bodily integrity, and earning a livelihood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does ultra vires mean?

A

A law or action goes beyond what is allowed by the Constitution — and is invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the proportionality test used for?

A

To assess if a restriction on rights is necessary, suitable, and balanced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What rights does natural justice protect?

A

The right to a fair hearing and an impartial decision-maker.

17
Q

What is the Double Construction Rule?

A

If legislation can be interpreted in two ways, one constitutional and one not, the court must adopt the constitutional interpretation.

18
Q

Which case supports using a less plausible interpretation to uphold constitutionality?

A

Doyle v An Taoiseach.

19
Q

What did the court say in Doyle v An Taoiseach?

A

Artificial or less plausible meanings may be acceptable if they do not do violence to the statute’s language.

20
Q

What is presumed about statutory powers under the Double Construction Rule?

A

That they will be exercised in a constitutional manner.

21
Q

What procedural rights are presumed under the Double Construction Rule?

A

That proceedings and adjudications will follow constitutional justice, including the presumption of innocence.

22
Q

What happens if statutory procedures depart from constitutional justice?

A

Courts can intervene to restrain and correct such departures.

23
Q

Do pre-1937 Acts automatically enjoy the Presumption of Constitutionality?

A

No, they must be significantly amended or incorporated into post-1937 Acts.

24
Q

What was held in ESB v Gormley regarding pre-1937 Acts?

A

Amending a pre-1937 Act does not automatically give the entire Act the presumption of constitutionality.

25
What did Blascaod Mór v Commissioner of Public Works decide?
Significant incorporation of a pre-1937 Act into a post-1937 Act may imply endorsement and justify applying the presumption.
26
What are the two key questions for applying the presumption to pre-1937 statutes?
Was the Act amended? Was the amendment significant?
27
What is the definition of mootness in Goold v Collins?
A case is moot where there is no longer a legal dispute between the parties and the decision would have no practical significance.
28
Why do courts avoid moot cases?
Courts avoid moot cases to conserve judicial resources and because their role is to resolve live, adversarial disputes.
29
Name two exceptions where a court might still hear a moot case.
1. Risk of similar order in future. 2. Exceptional public importance.
30
What case allowed a moot appeal due to significant constitutional and EU law issues?
Sullivan v Sea Fisheries.
31
In Kavanagh v Government of Ireland, what principle moderated mootness?
The overriding need to do justice between the parties.
32
Which case provided the most detailed summary of the mootness principle?
Lofinmakin v Minister for Justice and Equality (MJER).
33
What are the three main exceptions to the mootness doctrine from Lofinmakin?
1. Issue remains live for public body, 2. Point of law of exceptional public importance, 3. Test case.
34
Who provided a 10-point summary of mootness and where?
McKechnie J in Lofinmakin v MJER.
35
Which case did Barr J heavily rely on when ruling in Shields v Central Bank of Ireland?
Lofinmakin v MJER.
36
What did Faherty J say about Barr J's summary in the appeal in Shields v Central Bank?
She endorsed it fully and stated there was no live adverse decision to challenge.
37
What case influenced the rationale behind mootness from a Canadian perspective?
Borowski v Canada.
38
What is one reason from Borowski v Canada for not hearing moot cases?
Judicial efficiency and effective use of scarce court resources.