Judicial Review Cases Flashcards

(45 cards)

1
Q

Is the defendant a public body

A

Datafin test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Nature of power of the body

A

YL v Birmingham city council

Does the body exercise public law functions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Procedural exclusivity

A

O’Reilly v Mackman

Does the claim raise public law issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Exception to procedural exclusivity

A

Gillick v West Norfolk

If case raises both public and private law issues, have a choice between JR and PL proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does claimant have sufficient interest to bring a claim

A

s.31 SCA 1981

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is the claimant directly and adversely affected by the matter

A

The national federation of self-employed and small businesses

Does the claimant have sufficient interest to make a claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When dealing with pressure groups seeing if they have sufficient interest

A

World Development Movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Court may refuse if there’s been undue delay

A

S.31(6) SCA

Is the claimant within the time limit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Claimant must file claim promptly within a maximum of 3 months

A

Civil Procedure Rule 54.5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Complete ouster clauses

A

Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission

Exclusion of judicial review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Held that partial ouster clause stated judicial review claim had to be brought within 6 weeks

A

Ostler

Exception to time limits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Must exhaust other options before bringing claim for JR

A

Preston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The case that held there are 3 grounds for review

A

CCSU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Without lawful authority

A

McCarthy v Stone

Illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Wrongful delegation

A

Vine

Illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Exceptions to wrongful delegation

A

Carltona

  • Doesn’t apply to government ministers

Illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Exceptions to wrongful delegations

A

S101 LGA 1972

Lawful for councils to delegate to committees provided its done under guidelines

Illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Ferreting of discretion, Acting under the dictation of another

A

Lavender v Sons

Illegality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Ferreting of discretion, formulating a general policy as to the exercise of discretion

A

British Oxygen

Illegality

20
Q

Improper/ unauthorised use of an Act

A

Congreve

Where a public body acts for ends not provided for by Parliament
Unauthorised purpose

Illegality

21
Q

The decision will stand if the primary purpose was the proper one

A

LNWR

Dual purpose
Illegality

22
Q

Did the authority pursue an unauthorised purpose which materially influenced the decision

A

ILEA

Dual purpose
Illegality

23
Q

Taking an irrelevant factor into account

A

Padfield

Considerations
Illegality

24
Q

Ignoring a relevant factor

A

Roberts

Considerations
Illegality

25
Errors in law
Anisminic Illegality
26
Errors of fact
Khawaja Illegality
27
Must be so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever come to it
Wednesbury Irrationality
28
So outrageous in its defiance and logic that no sensible person could have arrived at it
CCSU Irrationality
29
It is possible for public authorities to fail the test
Wheeler v Leicester City Council Irrationality
30
Courts will consider whether Parliament would have intended consequences of non-compliance to invalidate decision and render it unlawful
R v Soneji Statutory procedures Procedural impropriety
31
Consider whether there has been failure to substantially comply
Coney Statutory procedures Procedural impropriety
32
If requirement is mandatory the decision will be quashed
Bradbury Statutory procedures Procedural impropriety
33
Where an interest may lead to financial/pecuniary gain, this will be bias
Dimes Direct Bias Procedural impropriety
34
Where decision-maker is involved in promoting sane cause as claimant
Pinochet Direct bias Procedural impropriety
35
If bias is indirect, court must consider this test in order for the decision to be quashed
Porter v Magill Indirect bias Procedural impropriety
36
Second part of Porter v Magill test
Hook How the decision would look to an observer
37
There’s a duty on decision makers to act in good faith and listen fairly to both sides
Rice Right to fair hearing Procedural impropriety
38
Claimants should know case and have right to reply
Fairmount The right to a fair hearing Procedural impropriety
39
Claimant is entitled to fair hearing which is fair and reasonable in all circumstances
Lloyd v McChahon Right to fair hearing Procedural impropriety
40
Concept of fairness is flexible and varies according to category of case
McInnes v Onslow-Fane Right to fair hearing Procedural impropriety
41
Forfeiture cases
Ridge v Baldwin Right to fair hearing Procedural impropriety
42
Procedural limited expectation
Asif Khan Right to fair hearing Procedural impropriety
43
Substantive legitimate expectation
Coughlan Right to fair hearing Procedural impropriety
44
There is no right to seek JR if decision is preliminary and not final
Lewis v Heffer Limitations to right to a fair hearing Procedural impropriety
45
There is no legal duty for public bodies to give reasons for their decision
Hasan Limits to right to fair hearing Procedural impropriety